Spaces:
Runtime error
Runtime error
Update app.py
Browse filesdemo my custom tool
app.py
CHANGED
|
@@ -17,7 +17,40 @@ def my_custom_tool(arg1:str, arg2:int)-> str: #it's import to specify the return
|
|
| 17 |
arg2: the number of sections
|
| 18 |
"""
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-
output =
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 21 |
return output
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
@tool
|
|
|
|
| 17 |
arg2: the number of sections
|
| 18 |
"""
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
+
output = """
|
| 21 |
+
# Tender Document Template: Building a Rag Article Generating System
|
| 22 |
+
|
| 23 |
+
## 1. Introduction
|
| 24 |
+
This tender document outlines the requirements for the development of a Rag Article Generating System. The system is intended to automate the process of generating rag articles for various applications.
|
| 25 |
+
|
| 26 |
+
## 2. Scope of Work
|
| 27 |
+
The scope of work includes the development, testing, and deployment of a Rag Article Generating System. The system should be capable of:
|
| 28 |
+
- Generating high-quality rag articles based on given criteria.
|
| 29 |
+
- Providing a user-friendly interface for operators.
|
| 30 |
+
- Ensuring data security and privacy.
|
| 31 |
+
|
| 32 |
+
## 3. Deliverables
|
| 33 |
+
The deliverables for this tender include:
|
| 34 |
+
- A fully functional Rag Article Generating System.
|
| 35 |
+
- Source code with proper documentation.
|
| 36 |
+
- User manuals and training materials.
|
| 37 |
+
- A one-year warranty and maintenance service.
|
| 38 |
+
|
| 39 |
+
## 4. Timeline
|
| 40 |
+
The timeline for the project is as follows:
|
| 41 |
+
- Proposal Submission: [Insert Date]
|
| 42 |
+
- Evaluation Period: [Insert Date]
|
| 43 |
+
- Contract Award: [Insert Date]
|
| 44 |
+
- Development Period: [Insert Date]
|
| 45 |
+
- Deployment: [Insert Date]
|
| 46 |
+
|
| 47 |
+
## 5. Evaluation Criteria
|
| 48 |
+
The proposals will be evaluated based on the following criteria:
|
| 49 |
+
- Technical Feasibility: 40%
|
| 50 |
+
- Cost Effectiveness: 30%
|
| 51 |
+
- Experience and Expertise: 20%
|
| 52 |
+
- Customer References: 10%
|
| 53 |
+
"""
|
| 54 |
return output
|
| 55 |
|
| 56 |
@tool
|