hexuan21 commited on
Commit
ed685b1
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): 668a317

upload refined_40k/test_bench 's json, videos and frames

Browse files
data/refined_40k/test_bench/data_bad_insf.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,264 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ [
2
+ {
3
+ "id": "a700237",
4
+ "images": [
5
+ "a700237_00.jpg",
6
+ "a700237_01.jpg",
7
+ "a700237_02.jpg",
8
+ "a700237_03.jpg",
9
+ "a700237_04.jpg",
10
+ "a700237_05.jpg",
11
+ "a700237_06.jpg",
12
+ "a700237_07.jpg"
13
+ ],
14
+ "conversations": [
15
+ {
16
+ "from": "human",
17
+ "value": "\nSuppose you are an expert in judging and evaluating the quality of AI-generated videos, \nplease watch the following frames of a given video and see the text prompt for generating the video, \nthen give scores from 5 different dimensions:\n(1) visual quality: the quality of the video in terms of clearness, resolution, brightness, and color\n(2) temporal consistency, the consistency of objects or humans in video\n(3) dynamic degree, the degree of dynamic changes\n(4) text-to-video alignment, the alignment between the text prompt and the video content\n(5) factual consistency, the consistency of the video content with the common-sense and factual knowledge\n\nFor each dimension, output a number from [1,2,3,4], \nin which '1' means 'Bad', '2' means 'Average', '3' means 'Good', \n'4' means 'Real' or 'Perfect' (the video is like a real video)\nHere is an output example:\nvisual quality: 4\ntemporal consistency: 4\ndynamic degree: 3\ntext-to-video alignment: 1\nfactual consistency: 2\n\nFor this video, the text prompt is \"long road bright. at the end no car no person except sunshine. forest. little. animals \",\nall the frames of video are as follows: \n\n<image> <image> <image> <image> <image> <image> <image> <image> \n"
18
+ },
19
+ {
20
+ "from": "gpt",
21
+ "value": "visual quality: 1\n temporal consistency: 1\n dynamic degree: 3\n text-to-video alignment: 1\n factual consistency: 1\n"
22
+ }
23
+ ]
24
+ },
25
+ {
26
+ "id": "a701988",
27
+ "images": [
28
+ "a701988_00.jpg",
29
+ "a701988_01.jpg",
30
+ "a701988_02.jpg",
31
+ "a701988_03.jpg",
32
+ "a701988_04.jpg",
33
+ "a701988_05.jpg",
34
+ "a701988_06.jpg",
35
+ "a701988_07.jpg"
36
+ ],
37
+ "conversations": [
38
+ {
39
+ "from": "human",
40
+ "value": "\nSuppose you are an expert in judging and evaluating the quality of AI-generated videos, \nplease watch the following frames of a given video and see the text prompt for generating the video, \nthen give scores from 5 different dimensions:\n(1) visual quality: the quality of the video in terms of clearness, resolution, brightness, and color\n(2) temporal consistency, the consistency of objects or humans in video\n(3) dynamic degree, the degree of dynamic changes\n(4) text-to-video alignment, the alignment between the text prompt and the video content\n(5) factual consistency, the consistency of the video content with the common-sense and factual knowledge\n\nFor each dimension, output a number from [1,2,3,4], \nin which '1' means 'Bad', '2' means 'Average', '3' means 'Good', \n'4' means 'Real' or 'Perfect' (the video is like a real video)\nHere is an output example:\nvisual quality: 4\ntemporal consistency: 4\ndynamic degree: 3\ntext-to-video alignment: 1\nfactual consistency: 2\n\nFor this video, the text prompt is \"brown tabby cat sleeping on her back while on a cat bed in a bathroom \",\nall the frames of video are as follows: \n\n<image> <image> <image> <image> <image> <image> <image> <image> \n"
41
+ },
42
+ {
43
+ "from": "gpt",
44
+ "value": "visual quality: 1\n temporal consistency: 1\n dynamic degree: 3\n text-to-video alignment: 1\n factual consistency: 1\n"
45
+ }
46
+ ]
47
+ },
48
+ {
49
+ "id": "a401676",
50
+ "images": [
51
+ "a401676_00.jpg",
52
+ "a401676_01.jpg",
53
+ "a401676_02.jpg",
54
+ "a401676_03.jpg",
55
+ "a401676_04.jpg",
56
+ "a401676_05.jpg",
57
+ "a401676_06.jpg",
58
+ "a401676_07.jpg",
59
+ "a401676_08.jpg",
60
+ "a401676_09.jpg",
61
+ "a401676_10.jpg",
62
+ "a401676_11.jpg",
63
+ "a401676_12.jpg",
64
+ "a401676_13.jpg",
65
+ "a401676_14.jpg",
66
+ "a401676_15.jpg"
67
+ ],
68
+ "conversations": [
69
+ {
70
+ "from": "human",
71
+ "value": "\nSuppose you are an expert in judging and evaluating the quality of AI-generated videos, \nplease watch the following frames of a given video and see the text prompt for generating the video, \nthen give scores from 5 different dimensions:\n(1) visual quality: the quality of the video in terms of clearness, resolution, brightness, and color\n(2) temporal consistency, the consistency of objects or humans in video\n(3) dynamic degree, the degree of dynamic changes\n(4) text-to-video alignment, the alignment between the text prompt and the video content\n(5) factual consistency, the consistency of the video content with the common-sense and factual knowledge\n\nFor each dimension, output a number from [1,2,3,4], \nin which '1' means 'Bad', '2' means 'Average', '3' means 'Good', \n'4' means 'Real' or 'Perfect' (the video is like a real video)\nHere is an output example:\nvisual quality: 4\ntemporal consistency: 4\ndynamic degree: 3\ntext-to-video alignment: 1\nfactual consistency: 2\n\nFor this video, the text prompt is \"a space ship flying over a planet with stars in the background \",\nall the frames of video are as follows: \n\n<image> <image> <image> <image> <image> <image> <image> <image> <image> <image> <image> <image> <image> <image> <image> <image> \n"
72
+ },
73
+ {
74
+ "from": "gpt",
75
+ "value": "visual quality: 1\n temporal consistency: 1\n dynamic degree: 3\n text-to-video alignment: 1\n factual consistency: 1\n"
76
+ }
77
+ ]
78
+ },
79
+ {
80
+ "id": "a701435",
81
+ "images": [
82
+ "a701435_00.jpg",
83
+ "a701435_01.jpg",
84
+ "a701435_02.jpg",
85
+ "a701435_03.jpg",
86
+ "a701435_04.jpg",
87
+ "a701435_05.jpg",
88
+ "a701435_06.jpg",
89
+ "a701435_07.jpg"
90
+ ],
91
+ "conversations": [
92
+ {
93
+ "from": "human",
94
+ "value": "\nSuppose you are an expert in judging and evaluating the quality of AI-generated videos, \nplease watch the following frames of a given video and see the text prompt for generating the video, \nthen give scores from 5 different dimensions:\n(1) visual quality: the quality of the video in terms of clearness, resolution, brightness, and color\n(2) temporal consistency, the consistency of objects or humans in video\n(3) dynamic degree, the degree of dynamic changes\n(4) text-to-video alignment, the alignment between the text prompt and the video content\n(5) factual consistency, the consistency of the video content with the common-sense and factual knowledge\n\nFor each dimension, output a number from [1,2,3,4], \nin which '1' means 'Bad', '2' means 'Average', '3' means 'Good', \n'4' means 'Real' or 'Perfect' (the video is like a real video)\nHere is an output example:\nvisual quality: 4\ntemporal consistency: 4\ndynamic degree: 3\ntext-to-video alignment: 1\nfactual consistency: 2\n\nFor this video, the text prompt is \"A cross with a piece of red cloth wrapped around it waving in the wind during a sunrise in a beautiful hilly environment with waterfalls and birds flying in the sky \",\nall the frames of video are as follows: \n\n<image> <image> <image> <image> <image> <image> <image> <image> \n"
95
+ },
96
+ {
97
+ "from": "gpt",
98
+ "value": "visual quality: 1\n temporal consistency: 1\n dynamic degree: 3\n text-to-video alignment: 1\n factual consistency: 1\n"
99
+ }
100
+ ]
101
+ },
102
+ {
103
+ "id": "a401959",
104
+ "images": [
105
+ "a401959_00.jpg",
106
+ "a401959_01.jpg",
107
+ "a401959_02.jpg",
108
+ "a401959_03.jpg",
109
+ "a401959_04.jpg",
110
+ "a401959_05.jpg",
111
+ "a401959_06.jpg",
112
+ "a401959_07.jpg",
113
+ "a401959_08.jpg",
114
+ "a401959_09.jpg",
115
+ "a401959_10.jpg",
116
+ "a401959_11.jpg",
117
+ "a401959_12.jpg",
118
+ "a401959_13.jpg",
119
+ "a401959_14.jpg",
120
+ "a401959_15.jpg"
121
+ ],
122
+ "conversations": [
123
+ {
124
+ "from": "human",
125
+ "value": "\nSuppose you are an expert in judging and evaluating the quality of AI-generated videos, \nplease watch the following frames of a given video and see the text prompt for generating the video, \nthen give scores from 5 different dimensions:\n(1) visual quality: the quality of the video in terms of clearness, resolution, brightness, and color\n(2) temporal consistency, the consistency of objects or humans in video\n(3) dynamic degree, the degree of dynamic changes\n(4) text-to-video alignment, the alignment between the text prompt and the video content\n(5) factual consistency, the consistency of the video content with the common-sense and factual knowledge\n\nFor each dimension, output a number from [1,2,3,4], \nin which '1' means 'Bad', '2' means 'Average', '3' means 'Good', \n'4' means 'Real' or 'Perfect' (the video is like a real video)\nHere is an output example:\nvisual quality: 4\ntemporal consistency: 4\ndynamic degree: 3\ntext-to-video alignment: 1\nfactual consistency: 2\n\nFor this video, the text prompt is \"a young man running across a grass field with his dog being filmed by an overhead drone \",\nall the frames of video are as follows: \n\n<image> <image> <image> <image> <image> <image> <image> <image> <image> <image> <image> <image> <image> <image> <image> <image> \n"
126
+ },
127
+ {
128
+ "from": "gpt",
129
+ "value": "visual quality: 1\n temporal consistency: 1\n dynamic degree: 3\n text-to-video alignment: 1\n factual consistency: 1\n"
130
+ }
131
+ ]
132
+ },
133
+ {
134
+ "id": "a700701",
135
+ "images": [
136
+ "a700701_00.jpg",
137
+ "a700701_01.jpg",
138
+ "a700701_02.jpg",
139
+ "a700701_03.jpg",
140
+ "a700701_04.jpg",
141
+ "a700701_05.jpg",
142
+ "a700701_06.jpg",
143
+ "a700701_07.jpg"
144
+ ],
145
+ "conversations": [
146
+ {
147
+ "from": "human",
148
+ "value": "\nSuppose you are an expert in judging and evaluating the quality of AI-generated videos, \nplease watch the following frames of a given video and see the text prompt for generating the video, \nthen give scores from 5 different dimensions:\n(1) visual quality: the quality of the video in terms of clearness, resolution, brightness, and color\n(2) temporal consistency, the consistency of objects or humans in video\n(3) dynamic degree, the degree of dynamic changes\n(4) text-to-video alignment, the alignment between the text prompt and the video content\n(5) factual consistency, the consistency of the video content with the common-sense and factual knowledge\n\nFor each dimension, output a number from [1,2,3,4], \nin which '1' means 'Bad', '2' means 'Average', '3' means 'Good', \n'4' means 'Real' or 'Perfect' (the video is like a real video)\nHere is an output example:\nvisual quality: 4\ntemporal consistency: 4\ndynamic degree: 3\ntext-to-video alignment: 1\nfactual consistency: 2\n\nFor this video, the text prompt is \"Collective dinner tables in the streets of Cairo \",\nall the frames of video are as follows: \n\n<image> <image> <image> <image> <image> <image> <image> <image> \n"
149
+ },
150
+ {
151
+ "from": "gpt",
152
+ "value": "visual quality: 1\n temporal consistency: 1\n dynamic degree: 3\n text-to-video alignment: 1\n factual consistency: 1\n"
153
+ }
154
+ ]
155
+ },
156
+ {
157
+ "id": "a701039",
158
+ "images": [
159
+ "a701039_00.jpg",
160
+ "a701039_01.jpg",
161
+ "a701039_02.jpg",
162
+ "a701039_03.jpg",
163
+ "a701039_04.jpg",
164
+ "a701039_05.jpg",
165
+ "a701039_06.jpg",
166
+ "a701039_07.jpg"
167
+ ],
168
+ "conversations": [
169
+ {
170
+ "from": "human",
171
+ "value": "\nSuppose you are an expert in judging and evaluating the quality of AI-generated videos, \nplease watch the following frames of a given video and see the text prompt for generating the video, \nthen give scores from 5 different dimensions:\n(1) visual quality: the quality of the video in terms of clearness, resolution, brightness, and color\n(2) temporal consistency, the consistency of objects or humans in video\n(3) dynamic degree, the degree of dynamic changes\n(4) text-to-video alignment, the alignment between the text prompt and the video content\n(5) factual consistency, the consistency of the video content with the common-sense and factual knowledge\n\nFor each dimension, output a number from [1,2,3,4], \nin which '1' means 'Bad', '2' means 'Average', '3' means 'Good', \n'4' means 'Real' or 'Perfect' (the video is like a real video)\nHere is an output example:\nvisual quality: 4\ntemporal consistency: 4\ndynamic degree: 3\ntext-to-video alignment: 1\nfactual consistency: 2\n\nFor this video, the text prompt is \"make me a short video about a person talking about how bad the world has become \",\nall the frames of video are as follows: \n\n<image> <image> <image> <image> <image> <image> <image> <image> \n"
172
+ },
173
+ {
174
+ "from": "gpt",
175
+ "value": "visual quality: 1\n temporal consistency: 1\n dynamic degree: 3\n text-to-video alignment: 1\n factual consistency: 1\n"
176
+ }
177
+ ]
178
+ },
179
+ {
180
+ "id": "a701867",
181
+ "images": [
182
+ "a701867_00.jpg",
183
+ "a701867_01.jpg",
184
+ "a701867_02.jpg",
185
+ "a701867_03.jpg",
186
+ "a701867_04.jpg",
187
+ "a701867_05.jpg",
188
+ "a701867_06.jpg",
189
+ "a701867_07.jpg"
190
+ ],
191
+ "conversations": [
192
+ {
193
+ "from": "human",
194
+ "value": "\nSuppose you are an expert in judging and evaluating the quality of AI-generated videos, \nplease watch the following frames of a given video and see the text prompt for generating the video, \nthen give scores from 5 different dimensions:\n(1) visual quality: the quality of the video in terms of clearness, resolution, brightness, and color\n(2) temporal consistency, the consistency of objects or humans in video\n(3) dynamic degree, the degree of dynamic changes\n(4) text-to-video alignment, the alignment between the text prompt and the video content\n(5) factual consistency, the consistency of the video content with the common-sense and factual knowledge\n\nFor each dimension, output a number from [1,2,3,4], \nin which '1' means 'Bad', '2' means 'Average', '3' means 'Good', \n'4' means 'Real' or 'Perfect' (the video is like a real video)\nHere is an output example:\nvisual quality: 4\ntemporal consistency: 4\ndynamic degree: 3\ntext-to-video alignment: 1\nfactual consistency: 2\n\nFor this video, the text prompt is \"Monky observing two Cats teamwork with a pleased expression \",\nall the frames of video are as follows: \n\n<image> <image> <image> <image> <image> <image> <image> <image> \n"
195
+ },
196
+ {
197
+ "from": "gpt",
198
+ "value": "visual quality: 1\n temporal consistency: 1\n dynamic degree: 3\n text-to-video alignment: 1\n factual consistency: 1\n"
199
+ }
200
+ ]
201
+ },
202
+ {
203
+ "id": "a400221",
204
+ "images": [
205
+ "a400221_00.jpg",
206
+ "a400221_01.jpg",
207
+ "a400221_02.jpg",
208
+ "a400221_03.jpg",
209
+ "a400221_04.jpg",
210
+ "a400221_05.jpg",
211
+ "a400221_06.jpg",
212
+ "a400221_07.jpg",
213
+ "a400221_08.jpg",
214
+ "a400221_09.jpg",
215
+ "a400221_10.jpg",
216
+ "a400221_11.jpg",
217
+ "a400221_12.jpg",
218
+ "a400221_13.jpg",
219
+ "a400221_14.jpg",
220
+ "a400221_15.jpg"
221
+ ],
222
+ "conversations": [
223
+ {
224
+ "from": "human",
225
+ "value": "\nSuppose you are an expert in judging and evaluating the quality of AI-generated videos, \nplease watch the following frames of a given video and see the text prompt for generating the video, \nthen give scores from 5 different dimensions:\n(1) visual quality: the quality of the video in terms of clearness, resolution, brightness, and color\n(2) temporal consistency, the consistency of objects or humans in video\n(3) dynamic degree, the degree of dynamic changes\n(4) text-to-video alignment, the alignment between the text prompt and the video content\n(5) factual consistency, the consistency of the video content with the common-sense and factual knowledge\n\nFor each dimension, output a number from [1,2,3,4], \nin which '1' means 'Bad', '2' means 'Average', '3' means 'Good', \n'4' means 'Real' or 'Perfect' (the video is like a real video)\nHere is an output example:\nvisual quality: 4\ntemporal consistency: 4\ndynamic degree: 3\ntext-to-video alignment: 1\nfactual consistency: 2\n\nFor this video, the text prompt is \"japanese devil samurai standing majestically with kitana, highly detailed, intricate details, symmetrical, digital 3d, hard surface, real time, vfx, trending on artstation, ultra hd, hdr, cinematic, hyper realism, high detail, octane render, 8k \",\nall the frames of video are as follows: \n\n<image> <image> <image> <image> <image> <image> <image> <image> <image> <image> <image> <image> <image> <image> <image> <image> \n"
226
+ },
227
+ {
228
+ "from": "gpt",
229
+ "value": "visual quality: 1\n temporal consistency: 1\n dynamic degree: 3\n text-to-video alignment: 1\n factual consistency: 1\n"
230
+ }
231
+ ]
232
+ },
233
+ {
234
+ "id": "a401845",
235
+ "images": [
236
+ "a401845_00.jpg",
237
+ "a401845_01.jpg",
238
+ "a401845_02.jpg",
239
+ "a401845_03.jpg",
240
+ "a401845_04.jpg",
241
+ "a401845_05.jpg",
242
+ "a401845_06.jpg",
243
+ "a401845_07.jpg",
244
+ "a401845_08.jpg",
245
+ "a401845_09.jpg",
246
+ "a401845_10.jpg",
247
+ "a401845_11.jpg",
248
+ "a401845_12.jpg",
249
+ "a401845_13.jpg",
250
+ "a401845_14.jpg",
251
+ "a401845_15.jpg"
252
+ ],
253
+ "conversations": [
254
+ {
255
+ "from": "human",
256
+ "value": "\nSuppose you are an expert in judging and evaluating the quality of AI-generated videos, \nplease watch the following frames of a given video and see the text prompt for generating the video, \nthen give scores from 5 different dimensions:\n(1) visual quality: the quality of the video in terms of clearness, resolution, brightness, and color\n(2) temporal consistency, the consistency of objects or humans in video\n(3) dynamic degree, the degree of dynamic changes\n(4) text-to-video alignment, the alignment between the text prompt and the video content\n(5) factual consistency, the consistency of the video content with the common-sense and factual knowledge\n\nFor each dimension, output a number from [1,2,3,4], \nin which '1' means 'Bad', '2' means 'Average', '3' means 'Good', \n'4' means 'Real' or 'Perfect' (the video is like a real video)\nHere is an output example:\nvisual quality: 4\ntemporal consistency: 4\ndynamic degree: 3\ntext-to-video alignment: 1\nfactual consistency: 2\n\nFor this video, the text prompt is \"A soldier in uniform belly dance \",\nall the frames of video are as follows: \n\n<image> <image> <image> <image> <image> <image> <image> <image> <image> <image> <image> <image> <image> <image> <image> <image> \n"
257
+ },
258
+ {
259
+ "from": "gpt",
260
+ "value": "visual quality: 1\n temporal consistency: 1\n dynamic degree: 3\n text-to-video alignment: 1\n factual consistency: 1\n"
261
+ }
262
+ ]
263
+ }
264
+ ]