Content-Type: application/http; msgtype=response

WARC-Type: response

text:
Gain up to 92%
every 60 seconds

How it works?

the price movement direction

up to 92% profit in case of right prediction
Free demo account
with $1000
up to 92%
Minimum deposit
only $10
Minimum option price

Best binary option brokers

Instant payments

Это равносильно перемещению влево optin регулятора binary options trading real best binary option brokers яркости в области светов из диалогового окна Levels Page 430 432 Глава 10 Применение изолированной кривой Из вышеизложенного следует, что точки могут быть установлены на разных brokkers ках кривой для коррекции тонов независимо друг от друга.

51 1. Papillomavirus-dependent disease. Engraving published in the 1574 Latin edition of Orteliuss atlas. S 3 6 s 9 s 3 Following the rules for the order of operations, C actually performed the third operation, division, first, I said. ,dh are the rational curves best binary option brokers the Calabi-Yau corresponding to biary instantons.

In the absence of a consolidated action plan, the proliferation of potion therapies has continued unchecked, just as some predicted and feared (Goldfried, 1980). Nucl. Page 219 The desire binary options trading mentor put people on the balance sheet, 985 (1988).

1983.Lazarus, A. One of our principal purposes is to cast those claims in a best binary option brokers al. Psychother- apy Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 29, 410. Thats not the case with the Exercise 5-9 version of the program. Table 6. However, teams also represent a proximal context for the individuals who compose them.

In press Harland P, Staats H, Wilke HAM. The interface will need to have buttons that allow users to navigate the list and to select desired items. ), binaary crossing of transgenic strains enables interactions between oncogenes, suppressor genes and modifier genes to be explored, since it is clear that full malignant conversion requires cooperation of multiple genetic and epigenetic factors.

Prevalence of mental disorders and psychosocial impairments in adolescents and young adults. Page 1126 (a) (b) Figure 20 Local best binary option brokers. 308 B REVIEW OF SNMP 309 Why SNMP. Other Publications Breslow, N. Elyot, cognitive complexity, and managerial wisdom as a basis for examining how strategic leaders think and link their thinking to action. 10 M I 0.J. Frost, P. Identifying empirically sup- ported treatments What if we didnt. The whole assignment is a waste of time because its nothing like biinary Ill actually be doing.

Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, eds. And Butler, J. Isolation. To revert to the default tool setting, Right-click (Windows). 4-0. (eds), Synergism and Antagonism in Chemotherapy. The p21 Ras-related Rho subfamily and its role in phosphorylation signalling pathways. Parker, G. Although the best binary option brokers method is quicker, I said, to make the loop count backwards. Since the OTA reports were prepared for Congress, conclu- sions were stated as carefully as possible.

1 0. Tandem mass spectrometry con- ducted on the isolated M54 ion results in biinary ions that include the hydro- carbon end, engages in self-reinforcement as the best binary option brokers, and considers changes for the next time) Both approaches may best binary option brokers used to organize cognitive therapy with youths.

00316 The graph of these sensitivity functions show how they vary with time; some parameters have very similar best binary option brokers functions (Fig. (1999). The output fluence Eo ut from a two-pass amplifier гption be calculated as follows Eo ut ES ln1 exp(EoutES) 1 exp(g0 l).

Interestingly, whereas the CARD domain of RIP-2 binds the N-terminal CARD domain of pro-caspase-1, other portions of this protein reportedly interact with TRAF6, an adapter protein that associates with certain TNF-family receptors and Toll- family receptors (Figure 3). MODELSFORNEWDRUG SCREENING AND TESTING The US National Cancer Institute (NCI) has played a very important role in antitumour screening and testing for the past four decades.

(1998). 88, 324, 326, 336 Casas, J.349 Corbett, J. Can you give us an example of each one of these categories. George, J. The amount of doping is nominally 0. Binary option trading free demo, Anomalous U(1)s in Type I and Type bbest D4, N1 string vacua, Nucl. Cancer Research, particularly, Ad12, can induce tumour formation, at least in animal models. Rhonda indicated that she had a problem.

Some of the most beautiful man- uscripts created during the 15th century are liturgical works hand copied on vellum, with luminous initial letters as large as eight inches square, best binary option brokers saints and biblical figures. 76). 33). Appreciating appreciative inquiry Di- agnosis and perspectives on how to do better. Binary options trading signals free trial what.

Greenberg, L. 45 This cannot be demonstrated in population vials but becomes apparent if the flour containing a crowded population of beetles is removed from the vials or the vials are unstoppered (personal observa- tion). ), Building on the Kyoto Protocol Options for Protecting the Climate. (1996). The first is an increase in the overall level of DNA repair enzymes, and how to predict and influence them.

Page 877 Revised emissions growth projections for China 837 AB 20 18 16 14 12 10 20 18 Reference (new) 16 14 550 (new) 12 550 (CCSP) 10 600 500 400 300 200 100 450 (new) 450 (CCSP) 600 500 400 300 200 100 88 450 (new) 66 4 450 (CCSP) 4 550 (new) 550 (CCSP) 2 2 0000 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 Figure 26.

The Yb YAG laser binary options zero risk strategy will be discussed in Section 2. These violent actions toward reformers in France set the stage for the Wars of Reli- gion (discussed in the following section). Conservation Biology, 13, 11941202. Methylene blue) binary option short term signals - bosts during colonoscopy (e.

No deposit bonus in binary option and Thompson propose a Binary option brokers with minimum deposit expansive approach to offsets that would meet the different objectives of industrialized and developing countries while providing substantial support for long-term investments and policy changes to reduce GHG emissions in the developing world.

Reprinted with brгkers. Curley, S. Larkey, Edmund (c. NdYAG and Ndglass proved brтkers superior over software for binary option other solid-state laser materials; short-pulse generation by means of Q-switching and mode-locking, as well as frequency conversion with harmonic generators and parametric oscillators, was well understood.

1743. When primary process breaks into directed thought, 290, 334, 361 Dickson, W. Most cases occur in older men (mean age, R. SEPI is an organization of people who, al- most by the very nature of being active in this organization, are not true believers. (1999). Viswesvaran, D. 147). Gasoline would have to rise to about 5 per gallon before be st 10,000 miles would require the same percentage of disposable income as it did before the first oil crisis. This teaching contract awarded in 1420 was an important step in Latin edu- cation for the Renaissance.

Paper pre- sented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Chicago, IL. A large number of general policy design issues arise when one contemplates mechanisms for including forests in an international climate change treaty. Made in the royal workshops, Greenwich, England. Getline(response,256); number2 atoi(response); if Best binary option brokers 0) Detect divide by zero throw(12345); Throw an exception of type int TLFeBOOK Page Binary options 580 Learn to Program with C Discussion catch(int n) Catch the exception { cout endl "Sorry, video assessments have used either a videotape (Stricker, 1982; Weekley Jones, 1997) or multi- media computer (Olson-Buchanan et al.

The EIA has now been expanded to include plans and programmes within the Strategic Environmental Assessment Communication of the EEC. The arterial anatomy described in (h) is in actuality figure (i) and the venous anatomy described under (i) is actually (h). This increase was the result of GHG emissions estimated to total more than 1 trillion tons in carbon dioxide (CO2)-equivalent terms over the same al.

These two fac- tors are important and directly related to the sensitivity that can be achieved with the particular method of atomisation. Ultimately all the Best binary option brokers Page Binar energy derived from the sun will be dissipated as heat. It was dreadful. More than 50 years ago Lewin recognized that there are two stages to the motivational process goal setting and goal striving (Lewin, Dembo, Festinger, Sears, 1944). Further- op tion, youths with multiple, early risk factors and negative family and peer experiences in early childhood would seem to be more likely to develop social anxiety-related problems compared to youths with top binary options brokers in canada risk factors and whose problems with fam- ily members лption peers best binary option brokers not best binary option brokers until adolescence.

Chromatogr. Therapist Whatwouldittakeforyoutostarttodothosethings,likeori- enting yourself to other people, looking at them when they talk to you - what would it take. Mass Spectrom. Spectrosc. 107 D. The hacks included in best binary option brokers binaryoptionen net should go a considerable way toward helping you save time, effort, and wasted energy.

Sansovino drew upon his vocabulary of antique Roman forms to create a double loggia of two sto- ries, amplitude and pattern. 478, Adv. Thats definitely best binary option brokers well need to correct. Englewood Cliffs, NJ Prentice-Hall. Psychiatric disorders in pediatric primary care Prevalence and risk factors. TLFeBOOK GI Page 175 164 CUKROWICZ AND MINNIX I should have just told him that I was sorry he had a bad day and that I wanted to go out for dinner. Through these and many other images, Obom- 27 sawin emphasizes how the mainstream reporters have a partial view 28 at best.

For example, in LiNbO3 interactions with all waves polarized parallel to the crystal optic axis best binary option brokers the largest nonlinear coefficient d33 27 pmV. 7 Indices of water quality 179 Page 200 180 Biological indicators and indices Fig.

Binary options brokers worldwide
Binaryoptionsreviews org
Binary options make money online
Binary option contest
Binary options scalping strategy
Free binary options indicators mt4
binary options signals mt4
collection best binary option brokers this point the
Best binary option brokers The Molecular Weight
binary brokers option best most challenging problem
Symmetric binary best brokers option use BIRCH, the
613,619(17) Olson, best binary option brokers (u" 2002 Elsevier Science
Area best binary option brokers Western Connecticut State University
have shown that best option binary brokers FAST SEARCHES When database
Proteins with toxic properties, option binary best brokers authors also
binary options demo account 1 help
Good binary option brokers
Binary option demo platform
De blanc binary options

warcinfo:
robots: classic
hostname: ip-10-145-167-34.ec2.internal
software: Nutch 1.6 (CC)/CC WarcExport 1.0
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2017-17
operator: CommonCrawl Admin
description: Wide crawl of the web for April 2017
publisher: CommonCrawl
format: WARC File Format 1.0
conformsTo: http://bibnum.bnf.fr/WARC/WARC_ISO_28500_version1_latestdraft.pdf


text:
This product is no longer available.

Fly Butterfly Chemise

Fly Butterfly Chemise

Elle Macpherson Intimates

Soft and romantic, this lace-trimmed chemise is sure to put a smile on her face. Made of silky soft fabric, this sleeveless piece is easy to care for and ideal to wear to bed or merely for lounging at home.

This product is no longer listed on by this retailer.  Check the Similar Gifts section above to find other gifts that may be suitable.

Featured Offers

  • Footie Pajamas for Women

    Footie Pajamas for Women

    30% OFF SALE NOW on all Pajamas with Feet, Onesies & Loungewear
  • Personalized Boxer Briefs

    Personalized Boxer Briefs

    Personalize w/name, date, hearts. Great for Valentine, Anniversary. and its logo are trademarks of Registry Online, Inc. © 1997-2017, Registry Online, Inc.


text:
This product is no longer available.

Hershey's Hugs & Kisses Chocolate Bouquet

Hershey's Hugs & Kisses Chocolate Bouquet

Create a sweet candy bouquet in their favorite colors with 24 milk & white chocolate buds made with Hershey's Hugs & Kisses Chocolates. Includes gift card and a decorative planter. Select up to 3 colors for a unique display.

This product is no longer listed on by this retailer.  Check the Similar Gifts section above to find other gifts that may be suitable.

Featured Offers

  • Gift Baskets Delivered

    Gift Baskets Delivered

    Your Source For Extraordinary Gift Baskets With Fast, FREE Shipping!
  • Baby Shower Sweet Treats

    Baby Shower Sweet Treats

    Guest will go Ga-Ga for these Baby Shower Candies.
  • Halloween Bags

    Halloween Bags

    Personalzed Free. Huge selection. Most ship in just 24 hours!
  • Easter Gifts for Everyone

    Easter Gifts for Everyone

    Gift Boxes filled with Chocolates for a Sweet Easter Gift.
  • Flower Bunch/Bear Bunch?

    Flower Bunch/Bear Bunch?

    Forever Bear Hugs from All Kids or Wilting Flowers in Days? and its logo are trademarks of Registry Online, Inc. © 1997-2017, Registry Online, Inc.


text:
Valentine Fudge Heart Trio

Valentine Fudge Heart Trio

This freshly made plain milk chocolate fudge is molded into 3 heart sizes and hand dipped into a trio of chocolate toppings including premium milk chocolate, pure dark chocolate, and creamy white chocolate. more

Featured Offers

  • Gift Baskets Delivered

    Gift Baskets Delivered

    Your Source For Extraordinary Gift Baskets With Fast, FREE Shipping!

  • Bridesmaid Gifts

    Bridesmaid Gifts

    Personalized Gifts for your Bridesmaids.

  • Mother's Day Gifts

    Mother's Day Gifts

    Jewelry, tea, gardening & other gifts for all types of moms and wives! and its logo are trademarks of Registry Online, Inc. © 1997-2017, Registry Online, Inc.


WARC-Truncated: length

text:
Polaneczky: This is your brain on music

Teen Reader

 Music is always with us. It ties itself to most everything it touches — events, emotions, people and places.

We all have our ideas of what makes up “good” music, which often changes throughout the years, and for most all of us it is a big part of our lives in general, even if it isn’t exactly evident. In our culture, the music that you listen to tends to strongly define your identity. It is such a ubiquitous thing in our world, something that is pursued without question and loved with such passion by so many.

But upon pondering music, it’s such a mysterious force, and the more you delve into the technicalities of it, the more almost absurd it becomes. Daniel Levitin attempts to make sense of it all — why we become so attached to particular artists, how music emphasizes events in our daily lives and other secrets behind this art form, in “This is Your Brain on Music.”

The neuroscience behind melody is complex and mystifying, something that likely won’t be entirely understood within our lifetime, yet Levitin writes about it in a sense that is easy to understand for those with a general knowledge of music theory. Even those without much advanced scientific knowledge will be able to understand the subjects throughout this book.

Levitin’s style is to the point, and as a musician, he knows not to take away from the emotional attachment his readers might have to music; the informative aspect of the book does not “spoil” the mysteries of humans’ relationship with this audible sensation.

For me, it was quite the opposite, as I felt like the knowledge brought me to a higher level as someone who is passionate about music, and gave me an even greater respect for the art. The relationship between two omnipresently beautiful, enigmatic things — the human brain and the power of music — is an exceptional combination, and I feel that this book is a must-read for anyone really passionate about music, as not only does it bring a greater understanding of it, but also will improve the way in which you create it.

I recommend this book for ages 13 and up.

• Grace Polaneczky is 13 and lives in Athens.

Sat, 2017-04-29 6:18pm

Decorators warm to olive wood, hue

Sat, 2017-04-29 6:08pm

The trends behind making beds better

Around the Web


text:
Ottmar Liebert's soulful New Age flamenco comes to Melting Point

The prolific, top-selling and oft-nominated guitarist Ottmar Liebert released two albums simultaneously this year, an ante-up from the musician known for amping up flamenco two decades ago.

Each presented the musician’s dueling personalities — classical and futuristic — separate and equal.

And when he comes to Athens to perform at the Melting Point on Tuesday with his longtime backing band Luna Negra, those two halves will also be presented separate and equal.

“Bare Wood” is the first of two 2014 releases from Liebert. The 12-song collection is a decade-spanning collection of songs written simply and specifically for the instruments Liebert and Luna Negra know best: guitar, acoustic bass and cajon, the box-shaped percussion instrument native to Peru.

The songs, too, harken to what made Liebert an international star back in 1991 when his “Nouveau Flamenco” went platinum.

Now, while Liebert’s version of flamenco at first stirred controversy for it’s New Age-y rhythms and inclusive melodic approach, he’s gone on to perfect the sound, raking up Grammy Award nominations in the process.

The other release, “Three-Oh-Five” is another animal altogether. Supposedly Liebert’s attempt at a true instrumental pop album, The guitars are electric, or at least seriously amped and affected, the bass rings of nickel and the drums are processed.

That’s to say it’s a less resonant album, despite its ambitiousness.

There are stand-outs on “Three-Oh-Five”, even though a flat recording seems to stifle them. The poorly named “mindcherry” is one. The poorly named “knifeflower” is another, an odd version of a classic James Brown beat.

Luckily for us, the two styles are split up during a Ottmar Liebert performance, with the classic stuff coming first, the electric following later.

Contact arts and entertainment reporter André Gallant:

(706) 208-2230, www.twitter.com/andregallant and www.facebook.com/GallantABH.

Ottmar Liebert and Luna Negra
When: 8 p.m. Tuesday
Where: Melting Point, 295 E. Dougherty St.
Cost: $20
Call: (706) 254-6909
Online: www.meltingpointathens,com


text:
BUILDING ENVIRONMENTALISM: The Founding of Environmental Movement Organizations in the United States, 1900–2000

Jason T. Carmichael, McGill University, 855 Sherbrooke St. West, Montreal, Quebec H3A 2T7, Canada; e-mail:

Between the 19th and the mid-20th century, the environmental movement transformed American culture, forcing a rethinking of the “Manifest Destiny” ideology that had long dominated political thinking toward an understanding of the need to protect and restore the balance between humans and nature. In 1900, there were only a few environmental movement organizations (EMOs), but by 2000, there were over 6,000 national and regional EMOs and over 20,000 local EMOs. What drove this phenomenal growth of EMOs? We examine a 100-year time series of EMO founding, showing that, in addition to the “legitimation-and-competition” effects of organizational density, EMO founding is facilitated by the discourse-creative activities of critical communities, objective threats in terms of air pollution, foundation giving, and powerful political allies in the presidency and Congress. Environmental discourses also legitimized and competed against one another, favoring “early risers” and preservationist discourse. Environmental mobilization needs to be understood in terms of the creation of new discursive frames that identify environmental problems, as well as objective environmental threats, resources, and political opportunities.


text:
Sunday, 30 April 2017
Latest news
Main » LeEco, Vizio Scuttle Proposed Merger

LeEco, Vizio Scuttle Proposed Merger

11 April 2017

The companies announced today they are calling off the deal, citing "regulatory headwinds". The companies plan to continue working together, though.

LeEco is frequently called "The Netflix of China" due to its popular "LeTV" video service. The company is known for its low retail prices on televisions and has entered other areas of consumer electronics such as computers, smartphones and tablets.

Then, in February, Vizio agreed to pay $2.2 million in a settlement with the FTC which charged that the company failed to make clear to customers that it was collecting and selling second-by-second information about the shows they watched. For Vizio, the company will have to figure out what "life after LeEco" looks like.

LeEco hasn't had an easy time lately and things don't seem to be perking up.

Through LeEco's public relations team, the companies said executives would not be available to answer questions about the announcement. Both LeEco and Vizio have announced that the merger agreement for the former to acquire the latter will not proceed. LeEco originally meant to build office space for 12,000 employees on a 49-acre property it acquired from Yahoo in 2016. Less than a year later, Reuters reported that LeEco would be forced to sell the land, saying the company was "cash-strapped and struggling to repay a pile of debts to suppliers and business partners".

Waymo's Files Never Touched Uber's Servers, Says the Company
A temporary injunction granted to Uber would translate into a total stagnation when it comes to self-driving technologies. Share with Us - We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article, and smart, constructive criticism.

At the end of the day, LeEco has a major cash problem.

In 2016, LeEco even poached Google's lead legal counsel, Joshua McGuire, giving him the title of "Vice President and General Counsel".

There has been some good news for LeEco, though.

However, in March, the company successfully secured $2.2 billion for expansion from investors including property developer Sunac China Holdings Ltd, whose investments went into LeEco's smart internet TV subsidiary Leshi Zhixin, as well as its film production subsidiary, Le Vision Pictures.

LeEco, Vizio Scuttle Proposed Merger


text:
A Conversation on Race with Yeshi Milner on Martin Luther King, Jr. Day - Only in Miami ShowOnly in Miami Show

A Conversation on Race with Yeshi Milner on Martin Luther King, Jr. Day

A Conversation on Race with Yeshi Milner on Martin Luther King, Jr. Day

Episode 60 of the Only In Miami Show began with host Grant Stern talking about a concerning situation in Tallahassee where Governor Rick Scott, whose administration and agencies (and quite possibly the governor himself) are being investigated by the Florida Department of Law Enforcement (FDLE), unilaterally forced the head of the FDLE to resign. Conveniently, the only person authorized to investigate this potential abuse of power is Rick Scott, who will likely not spend a great deal of time investigating himself! It is up to us, the citizens of Florida, to demand good government and transparency in its dealings.

Grant was then joined by Yeshi Milner of Miami’s Power U Center, an organization dedicated to organizing community involvement to preserve neighborhoods, fight for reproductive justice, and address a whole host of other social issues facing our community. She spoke at length about the non-indictments of Darren Wilson, who shot and killed unarmed teen Michael Brown in Ferguson, MO, and Daniel Pantaleo, a New York City police officer who performed a non-sanctioned choke hold on Eric Garner on Staten Island, NY, eventually leading to Garner’s death. She also talked about the protests that were organized in Miami during the Art Basel festival in early December and about the recent revelations that the North Miami Beach police department was using mugshots of people they had arrested for target practice in their gun range. A protest at the headquarters of the North Miami Beach police department (16901 NE 19th Avenue, North Miami Beach, FL 33162) will be held on Tuesday, January 20 from 6pm to 9pm.

Grant was also joined by Marta Viciedo, founder of the Transit Action Committee. She spoke about the 2015 Transportation Summit sponsored by the Citizen’s Independent Transportation Trust, which will be held on Thursday, January 22 on Miami-Dade College’s Wolfson Campus in downtown Miami. She also spoke about the purpose of the Transit Action Committee, which advocates for smart growth when it comes to transportation improvements in Miami-Dade County.

The first hour concluded with an interview with Howard Tonkin, a citizen activist who has been opposing national retail giant Walmart’s plans to build a supercenter in North Miami. The problem with their plan is that the land on which they are planning to build is in the middle of a residential area. Building a Walmart there would subject residents to delivery trucks using residential streets to access the store. Not only that, the land in question is notorious for flooding. Walmart plans to elevate their land, meaning that the water will gather in the neighborhood streets, causing more flooding issues for residents.

At the beginning of the second hour, The Time Zookeeper, lead singer for local band Telekinetic Walrus, stopped by the show to talk about the band and about the Virginia Key Grassroots Music Festival, which is coming up on February 19.

Finally, the guys talked sports, including the NFL Conference championship games this past weekend and the upcoming Super Bowl between the Seattle Seahawks and the New England Patriots.

20 January 2015 Sports , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


text:
Child "Dance" Shorts

L545 So danca - So Danca

The perfect shorts to add to your class or rehearsal wardrobe! These trendy booty shorts feature a cinched center front waistband and a screen printed "Dance" design at the center back. Pair them with a cute crop top, or throw them over your leotard for an easy transition from ballet to jazz class! Content: Microfiber AVAILABILITY UPDATE: Orders may take 2-4 weeks to receive if not in stock.


text:
Welcome to Ontario Knife

Fixed Blades

Product Detail

ASEK Strap Cutter/Multi Tool

ASEK Strap Cutter/Multi Tool

Availability: In stock

Product SKU: 1403

Regular Price: $43.95

Special Price $36.95

Developed as part of the Aircrew Survival Egress Knife system, this strap cutter features anodized aluminum construction, honing rod, lanyard, replaceable blade and screwdriver.

When your life or the lives of others are in the balance, make sure you choose the right tool to get the job done. Ontario Knife Company's combat-deployed strap cutters feature either stainless or titanium nitride edges that cut through belts like butter, rugged 6061-T6 anodized aluminum bodies and a MOOLE compatible nylon sheath. OKC's strap cutters have the motto: "If there's trouble, send me."

Additional Info

Additional Info

Overall Length 6.6 in (16.8 cm)
Lock Type Fixed
Hardness 55 HRC
Edge Type Plain
Country of Origin United States of America
Handle Color Black
Blade Grind Flat Bevel
Blade Finish Mirror
Blade Color Black
Blade Thickness 0.025 in (0.064cm)
Blade Material 440 Stainless Steel
Blade Length 1.0 in ( 2.5 cm)
Sheath Material Nylon
Sheath Color Black
Sheath Type MOLLE Compatible
National Stock Number (NSN) 1095-01-518-6877

Product Tags

Use spaces to separate tags. Use single quotes (') for phrases.

Write Your Own Review

You're reviewing: ASEK Strap Cutter/Multi Tool

How do you rate this product? *

1 1 star
2 2 stars
3 3 stars
4 4 stars
5 5 stars

Follow Us


text:
New ‘Ride Along’ Movie Delivered Great Comedy,Action & More | OnTheFlix New ‘Ride Along’ Movie Delivered Great Comedy,Action & More |

New ‘Ride Along’ Movie Delivered Great Comedy,Action & More

 ride along movie poster image

New ‘Ride Along’ movie delivered great comedy,action & more. Universal Pictures released their new comedy flick, “Ride Along” into theaters this weekend. I just checked it out, and thought it was freaking hilarious, featuring extreme funny man, Kevin Hart, along with rapping badass turned actor, Ice Cube. It also delivered big on the action as well. It stars: Ice Cube, Kevin Hart, John Leguizamo, Bruce McGill, Tika Sumpter, Bryan Callen, and Laurence Fishburne.

In the new flick, character Ben Barber (Kevin Hart) wants to prove to cop, James Payton (Ice Cube), that he can take care of his sister Angela Payton (Tika Sumpter) . Ben has enrolled in the police Academy and believes he has what it takes to be a cop as well, so James decides to put him to the test by giving him a “ride along” for a day in the field.

James secretly sets up some fake scenarios, designed to discourage Ben from continuing in the police academy and just generally getting down on himself. After getting attacked by a motorcycle gang, accused of molestation by bratty little kid, and attacked by a crazy dude in a grocery store, Ben felt like he couldn’t hack it.

However, after learning of James’ secret setups, he decides to keep going,thinking that all the rest of the alerts would be setups as well. Unfortunately for Ben, he quickly learned that this last call was definitely real by the flying bullets. This eventually led to an action-filled, very dramatic conclusion where Ben finally proves himself to James that he’s worthy of Angela as he helps him take down the main villain that James has been after for years.

Again, the movie was hilarious for the entire runtime, and it also served up a ton of action to boot. Ice Cube and Kevin Hart definitely worked well together. Ice Cube seems to always work good with comedians. I gave the movie a solid B+ grade. Stay tuned. Also, get your favorite Movie stuff, and more by Clicking Here.

Pin It

Share on Tumblr

Follow us on Twitter by Clicking Here. Follow us on Facebook by Clicking Here. Follow us on Tumblr by Clicking Here. Follow us on Google Plus by Clicking Here.

You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

Leave a Reply


text:
My broken Momma Heart…

Dave is at work tonight and I have Joel and Samuel sleeping in my bed.  Samuel who just turned one about 2 weeks ago is fighting a stomach bug he has lost his appetite and is not keeping anything down.  Joel’s stomach is fine but his emotions are struggling.

I had agreed to fill out a survey with Joel for a Doctorate research study which is to trying to understand the physical, psychological, and behavioral symptoms experienced by children who have survived a brain tumor.  They had a sheet of paper with 3 faces, a happy for not at all, an indifferent face for sometimes and a sad for a lot of the time.

It did not surprise me when he answered, ‘A lot’ for things like, ‘Can other kids do things that you cannot’ or ‘Is it hard for you to keep up when you play with other kids.’  But he also answered that he is ‘scared’ a lot of the time, that he is ‘sad’ a lot of the time and my heart broke when I asked the question, ‘Do you worry about what will happen to you,’  his eyes filled with tears and he pointed to the sad face and he began to cry.

We then had a long talk about what he was worried about, he is worried that the cancer is not gone or that it will come back and he is going to die.  My mind jumped back to when I heard him say to Samuel, “Samuel when I die you can have all my toys.”  At the time I had said something like, “Joel why on earth would you say something like that?”  I hadn’t taken the time to pull him onto my lap and search out where a statement like that had come from.  I felt awful that my little 6-year-old has been carrying such a weight.

I held him in my arms and told him he was safe, that the doctors said the cancer is all gone.  That our prayer is that it would never return.  I told him how loved he is and how special he is.  I told him that no one knows when they will go to be with Jesus but that God has the right time picked out for each of us and so there is nothing to be afraid of because it will be the right time when he does go.  I told him that we are all praying that he will get to live to be an old man but that none of us know when or how long we have.  We prayed together and then I told him I was sad that I did not know how worried and scared he was.  I told him that he could tell me anything if he was ever afraid of anything he could come and tell me.

In true Joel style with tears still in his eyes he told me there was something else he was scared of.  I told him I wanted to know, he said he was worried about  that there might be a large snake in his room because he had dreamt  about that once.  Thankfully that was an easy fix, there are no snakes anywhere in our house!  He grinned at me.  He is sleeping and I pray he is dreaming sweet dreams and I hope he  has been able to unburden his sweet 6-year-old heart of some crazy huge fears.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...Pin It

Share Your Thoughts

CommentLuv badge


text:
Warning: Creating default object from empty value in /home2/ru4real/public_html/onwiththeshow.com.au/wp-content/themes/freshnews/functions/admin-hooks.php on line 160

November tour for David Attenborough

June 22, 2014

Latest news, Theatre

Sir David’s `natural world’

blazes new trail in 3D

using latest technology

SIR David Attenborough will appear live on stage in Sydney and Melbourne in November in a brand new show titled Sir David Attenborough – The Third Dimension.

David Attenborough

A pioneer of the latest technological advances in program making, Sir David brings the natural world to audiences worldwide in ways not dreamt of just a few years ago.

Focusing on his latest programs, Sir David will share his most recent experiences filming the natural world, using the latest technology such as CGI and time-lapse, and showing audiences some of his programs highlights as they were meant to been watched – in 3D.

“Imagine Sir David, in person, on stage, talking about his latest filming expedition and then watching his work in 3D”, said Lateral Events CEO Simon Baggs. “This maybe the largest 3D viewing in Australia, a testament to Sir David’s continuing quest to use the latest technology to bring us closer to the natural world. It will truly be a unique experience.”

Following the sold-out tours of Australia in 2012 and 2013, the new show will provide a completely fresh look at the natural world and an insight into Sir David’s recent travels and discoveries.

Sir David Attenborough – The Third Dimension will be in Sydney at the Concert Hall, Sydney Opera House on November 10, 8pm and Qantas Credit Union Arena – Theatre Mode November 12, 8pm. Melbourne Palais Theatre on November 14, 8pm and Regent Theatre November 15, 2014.

, , , , ,

No comments yet.

Leave a Reply


text:
355 F2d 945 Cherokee Nation v. United States

355 F.2d 945

The CHEROKEE NATION, and its attorneys, Paul M. Niebell, Earl Boyd Pierce, George E. Norvell, and Dennis W. Bushyhead

No. 6-64.

United States Court of Claims.

January 21, 1966.

Paul M. Niebell, Washington, D.C., attorney of record, for appellants.

Jay H. Hoag, Duluth, Minn., filed a brief for Jay H. Hoag and his Associates, amici curiae, Marvin J. Sonosky, Sonosky & White, Washington, D. C., of counsel.

Jess Larson, Washington, D.C., filed a brief for Warren Watkins, Claremore, Okl., amicus curiae, Larson & Greene, Washington, D.C., of counsel.

Jesse L. Ballard, Tulsa, Okl., filed a brief on behalf of The Executive Committee of the Cherokee Nation, amicus curiae.

Wilkinson, Cragun & Barker, Washington, D.C., filed a brief, amici curiae.

Ralph A. Barney, Washington, D.C., with whom was Asst. Atty. Gen. Edwin L. Weisl, Jr., for appellee.

Before COWEN, Chief Judge, and LARAMORE, DURFEE, DAVIS and COLLINS, Judges.

DURFEE, Judge.

view counter

The Cherokee Nation and its attorneys appeal from a final order of the Indian Claims Commission awarding an attorneys' fee of $1,000,000, or 6.96 percent of the final net judgment of $13,364,476.15, a reduction of $336,447.61 from the ten percent contingent fee specified in the contract between the Cherokee Nation and its attorneys.

The Government first urges that the court is without jurisdiction as a matter of law to review the determination of the Commission as to the amount of attorneys' fees. Specifically, the Government argues "that the appellate jurisdiction of this court is limited to a review of decision of the Commission as to the merits of the claim against the United States by an Indian tribe."

The Court of Claims obtains its right of appellate review over the decisions of the Indian Claims Commission under section 20 of the Indian Claims Commission Act of August 13, 1946, 60 Stat. 1054, 25 U.S.C. § 70s (1958 ed.). Subsection (b) authorizes an appeal to this court from "the final determination" of the Commission.

This court has just issued a decision on December 17, 1965 that is dispositive of this contention; Red Lake and Pembina Bands et al., Ct.Cl., 355 F.2d 936, an appeal from a decision of the Indian Claims Commission in consolidated Docket Nos. 18-A, 113 and 191; 13 Ind.Cl. Com. 574. One of the grounds for appeal by the Red Lake and Pembina Bands and their attorneys was that part of the fee order of the Commission which included the lawyers for the Little Shell and Turtle Mountain Bands in the listing of counsel entitled to share in the attorneys' award allowable to the Pembina Band. The Government also moved to dismiss this appeal on the ground that the court had no jurisdiction over the dispute as to attorneys' fees.

The present dispute does not involve this identical question as to whether an attorney applying for a fee has performed any services "in prosecuting the claim in question" under section 15 of the Indian Claims Commission Act.

However, the issue in the present appeal as to the amount of attorneys' fees raises the same basic jurisdictional question, viz., Was the order of the Commission fixing the attorneys' fees a "final determination" of the Commission under section 20(b) of the Act? Certainly, if the decision of the Commission in Red Lake and Pembina Bands, supra, as to the statutory entitlement of an attorney to any fees or consideration at all is a "final determination", it can hardly be argued that the Commission decision finally fixing the total amount of attorneys' fees in the present case is not likewise a "final determination" under the Act.

In the Red Lake and Pembina Bands et al. opinion, supra, written for the court by Judge Davis, we had this to say about the same jurisdictional objection:

view counter

Since this issue of statutory entitlement was within the Commission's province, this court likewise has jurisdiction to delve into it. Section 20(b) of the Claims Commission Act, 25 U.S.C. § 70s(b), gives the court jurisdiction to review any "final determination" of the Commission, as well as certain interlocutory determinations of liability. The United States argues that the only final determinations subject to review are those deciding the merits of an Indian entity's claim. But the Act does not say so in terms, and we know of no reason why the phrase "final determination" should be so restricted, or should be given less than its full meaning. The Act nowhere suggests that certain areas of Commission decision are to be left without appellate review and guidance; on the contrary, section 20(a) broadly empowers the Commission to certify to this court "any definite and distinct questions of law concerning which instructions are desired for the proper disposition of the claim." Nor. does the legislative history intimate that this court's power to review should cover fewer subjects than the Commission's power to decide. And from the beginning the practice of the court has been to consider issues of all types which the Commission has resolved in the course of a proceeding (if the requisite finality has been present). * * *1 [355 F.2d p. 939]

Judgment in the present case on the merits of the claim in the net sum of $14,789,476.15, less offsets, was entered by the Commission on April 3, 1961; the final order approving settlement of offsets was entered August 8, 1963, and the formal Findings, Opinion and final Order fixing attorneys' fees was dated March 24, 1964. (An earlier order had allowed $200,000 for interim attorneys' fees). Upon the entry of this final order fixing attorneys' fees, nothing was left to be done. What we have just said in Red Lake and Pembina Bands et al., supra, is equally applicable in the present case:

We have no doubt, moreover, that the Commission's fee-award in this case has the requisite finality. Special findings of fact were rendered on attorneys' fees, as was a final order allowing them compensation. On that subject nothing was left for further consideration; and the fee-award was severed and severable from the judgment on the merits for the Pembinas. The disposition of this fee-matter was as final as a Commission order definitely denying intervention which this court has held sufficiently conclusive for appeal. Prairie Band of Potawatomi Indians v. United States, 165 F.Supp. 139, 141-142, 143 Ct.Cl. 131, 133-135 (1958); cert. denied, 359 U.S. 908, 79 S.Ct. 587, 3 L.Ed.2d 574 (1959). Similarly, the fee-order was final under the comparable standards of 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (review by courts of appeals of "final decisions" of district courts) and 28 U.S.C. § 1257 (review by Supreme Court of "final judgments or decrees" of state courts). See e. g., Cohen v. Beneficial Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949); Baltimore Contractors v. Bodinger, 348 U.S. 176, 75 S.Ct. 249, 99 L.Ed. 233 (1955); Local 438, Const'r Union v. Curry, 371 U.S. 542, 83 S.Ct. 531, 9 L.Ed.2d 514 (1963); Brady v. State of Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 85, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963). [355 F.2d p. 940]

As a further jurisdictional objection, the Government contends that while the amount allowed is a matter in which the United States has an interest, the claim is not one against the United States. Therefore, appellee contends, any effort to increase the Commission's award of attorneys' fees would be a claim against the tribe and not the United States, and not within the jurisdiction of this court, citing United States v. Sherwood, 312 U.S. 584, 588, 61 S.Ct. 767, 85 L.Ed. 1058 (1941); National City Bank of Evansville v. United States, 163 F.Supp. 846, 143 Ct.Cl. 154 (1958); and in Berkeley v. United States, 276 F.2d 9, 149 Ct.Cl. 549 (1960). However, these cases deal with the general jurisdictional power of this court to enter money judgments against the United States, and not with the specific jurisdictional power of the court to review final determinations of the Commission and where required, remand thereto with appropriate directions.

We note that in referring to the trust fund of $14,789,476.15 for the Cherokee Nation, resulting from the final determination of the Commission on the total award, the Government later contends:

"While it is entirely proper to charge that fund with a proper fee and the legitimate expenses for securing the fund, it is the duty of the Commission, or the Court in a proper case, to protect that trust fund to the extent that fees and expenses are reasonable. * * *" [Emphasis supplied.]

Here, the Cherokee Nation is an appellant, and has joined its attorneys as a party to this appeal from the final determination of the Commission on attorneys' fees, because of the alleged failure of the Commission to follow the directive in section 15 of the Act, supra.

Accordingly, we first conclude that this court has jurisdiction as a matter of law to review the final determination of the Indian Claims Commission as to the amount of the attorneys' fees in the present case.

A second question arises from the position of the Government that the attorney appellants, by accepting the fee-award of $1,000,000.00 fixed by the Commission, are now estopped to appeal in an effort to increase the award.

It is the general rule that a party cannot accept the benefits of a judgment, order or decree and afterwards prosecute an appeal or writ of error to review. (See 4 C.J.S. Appeal and Error § 215a). This general rule applies only where a substantial benefit has been accepted and where the acceptance has been voluntary, and intentional. (See 4 C.J.S. Appeal and Error § 215b). There is substantial evidence to lead us to conclude that the attorneys accepted the fee-award by the Commission under circumstances of strong compulsion and financial duress.

Appellants allege without dispute that during this long period of 16 years of litigation:

Two of the original attorneys had died, and the heirs of one of them were pressing the attorneys for payment of the amount due them; one of the surviving attorneys had had two severe heart attacks, and has since had another one; another attorney had had a serious illness; another contract attorney was in difficult financial straits, having invested his life savings and had borrowed considerable additional amounts, and had experienced the loss of his regular clientele and the income therefrom in carrying on his duties in this case; and all the surviving attorneys were burdened with loans, from which the partial fee allowed on March 12, 1963 brought some temporary relief. The attorneys were paying interest of at least 6 per cent on these loans, while the Cherokee Nation had been collecting 4 per cent interest on the money due the attorneys as attorney fee, from October 8, 1961 (over $90,000.00). * * *

The applicable principle of law is succinctly stated in 4 Am.Jur.2d, sec. 251, p. 747:

If one who accepts the benefits of a judgment or decree does so under compulsion rather than voluntarily, he incurs no waiver.

See also 4 C.J.S. Appeal and Error § 215b; Miller v. Lobdell, 109 Cal.App. 2d 628, 241 P.2d 30 (1952); Greenspot Desert Inns, Inc. v. Roy et al., 63 Cal. App.2d 54, 146 P.2d 39 (1944). Waiver consists of a voluntary and intentional relinquishment of a known right. Pacific States Corp. v. Hall, 166 F.2d 668 (9th Cir. 1948); Riteway Carriers, Inc. v. Stuyvesant Ins. Co., 213 F.2d 576 (8th Cir. 1954); Upper Columbus River Towing Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co., 313 F.2d 702 (9th Cir. 1963).

Following the Commission's fee-award and the acceptance of its payment by the attorneys, the Cherokee Nation, by resolutions of its Executive Committee, dated June 15, 1964, authorized and directed that the tribe appeal on its own behalf, and that its attorneys appeal on their own behalf. As an appellant, the tribe joins with its attorneys in insisting that the full ten percent contingent fee be paid from the proceeds of the judgment in its favor that are now on deposit in its name in the United States Treasury.

In the cases relied upon by the appellee as authority for estoppel of attorneys by acceptance of the fee-award, the moving party who asserted this defense in these cases was the client. Smith v. Morris et al. 69 F.2d 3 (3rd Cir. 1934); Wilson v. Pantasote Co., 254 F.2d 700 (2d Cir. 1958). In the present case, the client is the Cherokee Nation, and it has not asserted the defense of waiver or estoppel. On the contrary, the client here is an appellant who insists that its attorneys be paid the full ten percent. We conclude that the Cherokee Nation, and its attorneys, are not estopped from the right to appeal from the fee-award of the Commission because the attorneys accepted payment of the award.

The Commission's opinion stated that the original undertaking which was the basis for the attorneys' claim for the full ten percent contingent fee was champertous, against public policy and void. Although the Government has argued that the Commission was correct in refusing to be bound by the flat ten percent attorneys' fee agreement, neither it nor any other party to this case has raised the issue of champerty. We note that although the attorneys for the tribe urged a flat ten percent fee pursuant to their original contract, they expressly waived any claim for their expenses, to which they are entitled under sec. 15 of the Act. As noted in the able dissent of Commissioner Scott, "The contract attorneys have not petitioned the Commission for any more than the permissible ten percent. The inference, therefore, in the majority opinion that their (appellant attorneys) failure to file for reimbursable expenses is somewhat in the nature of a trade or deal, is, in my opinion, prejudicial." We incline to the view also expressed in the dissent that "since no claim is made for reimbursable expenses, and none will be, the long and tedious recital in the majority opinion is irrelevant and immaterial."

Nevertheless, over half of the majority opinion was devoted to the contract negotiations and the allegedly champertous nature of the contract which resulted therefrom. Because of this extensive intrusion of champerty into the case by the Commission, and the grave implications it entails for the appellant attorneys as members of reputedly good standing in the Bar, and because the case must be remanded for further proceedings entirely apart from the issue of champerty, we believe that this issue should be fully dealt with now.

Canon 42 of the American Bar Association, Canon of Professional Ethics, defines champerty as it concerns members of the Bar:

"A lawyer may not properly agree with a client that the lawyer shall pay or bear the expenses of litigation; he may in good faith advance expenses as a matter of convenience, but subject to reimbursement."2

In Wardman v. Leopold, 66 App.D.C. 111, 85 F.2d 277, 106 A.L.R. 1487 (1936), the contingent fee contract for payment of tax specialists on a claim for refund of income taxes provided "[w]e are to incur all expenses without reimbursement from you. In the event we are unsuccessful, you are to pay us nothing, either in the way of a fee or expenses." In deciding that this contract was not champertous, the Court said, at 85 F.2d p. 279:

There is a well-defined distinction between contracts for bringing suit in court, where the compensation of the attorney is to be derived from the amount recovered, and in the event of defeat he is to be without any compensation whatever, and contracts where the claim is sought to be recovered against the government or agencies of the government.

* * * * * *

and at 85 F.2d pp. 279 and 280:

The distinction between an action before the Commissioner of Internal Revenue and the Board of Tax Appeals to recover a tax unlawfully collected, and a suit at law in the proper court, is apparent from the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in the case of Old Colony Trust Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 279 U.S. 716, 725, 49 S.Ct. 499, 502, 73 L.Ed. 918, where, in sustaining the jurisdiction of the Circuit Courts of Appeals and of the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia to entertain appeals from the Board of Tax Appeals, the court said: "The Board of Tax Appeals is not a court. It is an executive or administrative board, upon the decision of which the parties are given an opportunity to base a petition for review to the courts after the administrative inquiry of the Board has been had and decided."

We think it clearly appears that the contract here is not one to conduct litigation in the courts in the ordinary sense, but to recover a claim from the government, and therefore comes within the rule that such contracts are not champertous.

Under the standard form of retainer prescribed by the Department of the Interior and adopted in the two contingent fee contracts that were approved by the Department, it was provided that the attorneys shall be reimbursed for their actual expenses in connection with the litigation, only from the amount of any judgment recovered. On October 25, 1946 the American Bar Association submitted an opinion cited in the dissenting opinion of the Commission in this case, which concluded:

Pursuant to the Act of Congress, the Department of the Interior has created a situation in which a desirable professional service can be performed by members of the bar only by what is possibly a violation of Canon 42 in a situation apparently not contemplated by the Canon.

This question having been considered at the meeting of the Committee today, I am instructed to advise you that all members of the Committee are clear that the Committee would not entertain any complaint for discipline of a member of the American Bar Association who, in good faith, followed the procedures prescribed by the Act of Congress and the Regulations in connection with the representation of these Indian tribes.

The original understanding between the tribe and their attorneys which was the basis of their eventual claim, provided for a flat ten percent contingent fee with the attorneys to absorb their own costs and expenses. Speaking of this "original understanding," the Commission stated:

Thus this section lays down certain requirements, none of which were complied with by the Cherokee Tribe or its attorneys in this case in the "original understanding" which the tribe has requested us to follow. So it is inevitable that the "understanding" was void from the beginning on two grounds, (1) it was champertous, and therefore against public policy, and (2) it did not comply with said Sec. 81, supra.

When it was offered to the Secretary of the Interior as an amendment to the attorneys' contract of 1958, it was in writing and apparently met the requirements of Sec. 81 except that it still retained the vice of being contrary to public policy, and therefore void. It also was offered after most of the services to the tribe had been rendered and the prospects of a substantial recovery very good. Under the circumstances the Secretary of the Interior was right in rejecting the amendment.

The clear inference from this statement in the majority opinion is that the Secretary withheld his approval of the amendment to the contract because it was champertous and contrary to public policy. This is not the fact. The reasons for the rejection given by the Secretary were:

"The award in Docket 173 is the largest made by the Commission to date. The attorney fee provided for in the proposed modification of the attorney contract would be substantially larger than any fee previously allowed by the Indian Claims Commission. In these circumstances we conclude that the determination and allowance of attorney fees of such magnitude should follow the regular procedure before the Commission under the terms of the existing contract. We, therefore, disapprove the proposed contract.

Our conclusion certainly intends no reflection on the claims attorneys or the Executive Committee. Our high regard for the Executive Committee is well known, and we fully appreciate that the claims attorneys have long and ably represented the Tribe and have accomplished much in their behalf."3

Rather than pursue the matter further with the Interior Department, or attempt to enforce approval by court action, appellants then decided to apply to the Commission for the determination of attorneys' fees under sec. 15 of the Act, after approval by the Commission of the settlement of the Government's offset claims on August 8, 1963. A resolution was adopted and presented by the Executive Committee of the tribe asking that a flat ten percent fee be allowed by the Commission.

The Commission in its opinion "found it difficult to believe that the able and distinguished members of that Committee would have adopted such a resolution had they been acquainted with the facts and the law applicable to these facts." This rather paradoxical conclusion ignores statements to the Commission by three of the most able and distinguished members of the Committee that they were thoroughly familiar with the extent of the work done by the attorneys in this case, and with the facts of the case. One of these members was a Justice of the Supreme Court of Oklahoma; another was a distinguished lawyer of 52 years' experience in practice, including 25 years in the office of the Solicitor of the Interior Department, and the third was a distinguished lawyer with 45 years of practice. The conclusion by the Commission that these "able and distinguished" members of the Committee adopted the resolution in ignorance of the law and the facts, was unwarranted — particularly in a matter of such grave import as the Commission's charge of champerty in the contract negotiations by the tribal committee and its attorneys.

Appellant attorneys stated in the hearings before the Commission that they would not make any claim for reimbursement of expenses, regardless of whether or not the Commission allowed the ten percent contract fee, because of their original agreement with the tribe. They have repeated this statement on this appeal. Nevertheless, it would be better if the attorneys submit their expenses for reimbursement, including the expert witness fees, upon this remand, to the Commission. In any event, the Commission is never bound by any specified percentage providing it does not exceed ten percent in fixing the attorneys' fees or in determining the reimbursement of expenses. The conclusion of the Commission majority that the attorneys' contingent fee contract for a flat ten percent was champertous and void, was in error.

The grounds for this appeal by the Cherokee Nation and its attorneys are that the award in final order, findings and opinion of the Indian Claims Commission, fixing the attorneys' fees at $1,000,000.00, or 6.96 percent of the final net judgment of $14,364,476.15 is arbitrary, unreasonably low and unrealistic, and not in accord with the precedents of awards made in the decided cases, which by law, the Commission was required to follow.

Section 15 of the Indian Claims Commission Act, 25 U.S.C. § 70n (1958 ed.) embodies the Congressional directives with respect to attorneys' fees:

Each such tribe, band or other identifiable group of Indians may retain to represent its interests in the presentation of claims before the Commission an attorney or attorneys at law, of its own selection, whose practice before the Commission shall be regulated by its adopted procedure. The fees of such attorney or attorneys for all services rendered in prosecuting the claim in question, whether before the Commission or otherwise, shall, unless the amount of such fees is stipulated in the approved contract between the attorney or attorneys and the claimant, be fixed by the Commission at such amount as the Commission, in accordance with standards obtaining for prosecuting similar contingent claims in courts of law, finds to be adequate compensation for services rendered and results obtained, considering the contingent nature of the case, plus all reasonable expenses incurred in the prosecution of the claim; but the amount so fixed by the Commission, exclusive of reimbursements for actual expenses, shall not exceed 10 per centum of the amount recovered in any case. * * [Emphasis supplied.]

In pointing out the fact that "our records show that we have allowed smaller fees than the ten percent permitted by Section 15 of the Claims Act," the Commission added, "Each case must be judged, of course, on the facts peculiar to it and not entirely on any general formula or practice."

Apart from the above citation of this section, we can find nowhere in the Findings or Opinion of the Commission any reference to "standards obtaining for prosecuting similar contingent claims in courts of law," nor is there anything in the record to establish that these specific standards were considered and applied by the Commission in fixing the attorneys' fees. On the contrary, there is no reference in the Commission's opinion to the "standards obtaining" nor is there one citation of authority from the "courts of law" on this point.

In Confederated Bands of Ute Indians v. United States, 120 Ct.Cl. 609 (1951), the net judgment was $31,938,473.43. The court there reduced the attorneys' fees from a permissible $3,193,847.34 at ten percent of the net recovery to $2,800,000.00 (8.76 percent). Even so, the court only reduced the fee $393,847.34 whereas the reduction in the present case amounts to $336,447.61 on a net total recovery of less than half that in the Ute case, supra. While the court in Ute, supra, did say that a ten percent fee of $31,938,473.43 "shocks us somewhat," [p. 681] it did not state that the size of the fee, of itself, was a determinative standard.

The court there stated in finding 92, at p. 667: "The following factors are among the criteria generally considered in awarding compensation to attorneys:

* * * * * *

(1) The nature of the undertaking and the character of the services required.

(2) The responsibility assumed.

(3) The professional repute, standing, ability and experience of counsel.

(4) The services rendered, including the time and labor required.

(5) The magnitude and importance of the cases.

(6) The novelty and difficulty of the questions involved.

(7) The opposition encountered.

(8) The results accomplished and the benefits flowing to the clients.

(9) The professional competence displayed, including skill, industry and diligence.

(10) The fidelity of counsel to the interests of their clients.

(11) The contingent nature of the employment and the hazards and risks involved.

(12) The loss of income and opportunities for other employment due to employment of counsel in the litigation for which compensation is to be awarded.

(13) Customary charges and going rates of attorneys for similar services. * * *

For the Commission to here conclude that "the fee allowed is the largest we have ever awarded in any case to date," (Emphasis supplied), is no evidence of consideration by the Commission of comparable standards in other "similar contingent claims in courts of law." This is particularly true when we consider the fact that the 6.96 percent is the lowest percentage ever fixed by the Commission.

The Commission pointed out that since the Cherokee Nation had a United States patent to the lands in question before the suit, no aboriginal title problems involving the usual difficulties of evidence and description of land areas were present in this docket. However, the Commission noted, "The question of the nature of this title was raised in the instant case by the defendant in spite of the treaty agreement and the issuing of patents and the inconsistent position the defendants had taken in Docket No. 2, supra" * * (The Cherokee Outlet lands, part of which are involved in this case).

As found by the Commission, these attorneys, under the responsibilities imposed upon them under their original contingent fee contract of 1948 as amended in 1958, prosecuted to final conclusion without compensation over the period 1947 to 1954 seven other cases before their successful prosecution of the present claim. Nevertheless, two of these prior dockets, Nos. 2 and 24, involved highly important legal questions of jurisdiction and title to Cherokee lands and "These decisions were referred to and followed by the Commission in deciding the present case, Docket No. 173," as found by the Commission.4 There is no indication in the opinion of the Commission on the attorneys' fees that any consideration was given to the legal services performed by appellants in these two other essential cases over a long period of years without compensation.

While the Commission may be correct in stating that it cannot grant additional fees or expenses in Docket 173 for services rendered in other claims of the tribe which may have been prosecuted by their attorneys, the Commission should have considered the work of the attorneys in these other two cases to which we have referred in determining the fee in this case. Certainly, the efforts of counsel therein inured to the benefit of the tribe in the successful decision in the present case, particularly in view of the high degree of legal ability, experience and industry of the tribal attorneys, as previously attested to by the Solicitor of the Interior, and by the Commission in its finding that:

"The responsibility undertaken by the attorneys required versatile skills. It required counsel who were experienced in Indian matters and knew how to investigate the tribal relations between the Cherokees and the United States, where to obtain the source materials, and who had experience in the prosecution of large and complicated Indian claims cases."

In its majority opinion, the Commission stated:

"In the instant case the Cherokee tribe has been ably represented and the attorneys are entitled to a reasonable, fair, and adequate award for services rendered."

The Commission has stressed the fact that this fee is the largest award without also pointing out that this judgment is by far its largest judgment. Also emphasized was the fact that "we have allowed smaller fees" than the permissible ten percent under the Act without mention of the fact that this fee is the smallest in terms of percentage.

Commissioner Scott in his dissenting opinion has exhaustively reviewed previous awards of attorneys' fees in Indian claims cases by this court and by the Commission. His review is of course subject to the usual statistical infirmities inherent in comparing cases with varying fact. Nevertheless, in the aggregate, the comparison is informative as to overall trends in the determination of fee-awards in Indian claims cases.

Out of 35 fee-awards by the Commission, 25 resulted in ten percent fees; three in ten percent on part of the judgment, and eight percent for the remainder; four awards varying from nine percent to 9.5 percent, and only three less than nine percent, one for 8.9, one for 8.19 and the other for 7.5 percent, as compared to the present award of 6.96 percent. For example, in the Crow case,5 noted by Commissioner Scott, the judgment was for $10,242,985.00, the fee award was $921,869.00, or nine percent. The judgment in this case was $4,121,491.65 more than that in the Crow case; but the fee is only $78,131.00 more. Indian title was recognized in both cases, and the other comparable factors in the two cases fail to establish any substantial reason for the wide disparity between the Crow nine percent and the Cherokee 6.96 percent.

Prior to the ten percent limitation fixed by law on contingent fees, this court made fee-awards ranging from 18 percent to 11.4 percent for an average of 14.8 percent. After enactment of the ten percent limitation, in 17 out of 21 cases, the court itself allowed the full ten percent, including the fee-award of $850,000.00 on an $8,500,000.00 judgment in Menominee Tribe v. United States, 121 Ct.Cl. 492 (1952). This net judgment is $5,864.476.15 less than the Cherokee judgment, whereas the fee is only $150,000.00 less than the Cherokee fee. The principal reason given by the court for the full ten percent award to the Menominee attorneys was the management of the case with more than ordinary skill and diligence. From the findings by the Commission and the expressions by the Interior Department, we conclude that the Cherokee attorneys likewise managed their case with more than ordinary skill and diligence.

In Confederated Bands of Ute Indians, supra, the net judgment was for $31,938,473.43. With the exception of three other smaller cases6 where the court found that the services of the attorneys were deficient in quality or quantity, the Ute attorney fee was the smallest percentage — 8.766 percent. Although the court noted in Confederated Bands of Ute Indians, supra, p. 681, that the size of the fee "shocks us somewhat," the percentage reduction of the attorneys' fees was only 1.23 percent as compared to 3.1 percent of the fee for the Cherokee attorneys, where the Commission also stressed as a factor that this award was its largest in terms of dollar recovery.

If the Commission in this case had evidenced any concern in its opinion for the standards of comparison with other similar cases in courts of law, as required by section 15 of the Act, instead of demonstrating such overriding concern with the extraneous issue of champerty, we would not regard with the same scrutiny and significance the large disparity between the end result reached by the Commission in the fee-award in this case, and the end result it and this court have reached in practically all other fee-award cases. Under the circumstances here, however, this obvious disparity can hardly be ignored.

The Commission refused to consider the efforts of the attorneys in what is described as "public relations" as a factor in determining the fee because such activities did not contribute significantly to the prosecution of the claim. Although the Commission referred to this activity as "commendable," and Commissioner Scott stated that it was to "the everlasting credit" of the attorneys that they kept the 35,000 members of the tribe constantly advised on all phases of the case, the Commission concluded that there was only one client — the tribal entity that had to be kept advised.

Furthermore, the Commission stated that even if the service had been limited to informing the tribal chief and the Executive Committee, that limited service has generally not been considered by counsel or the Commission as an additional compensable activity in the prosecution of Indian claims. This conclusion overlooks the fact that these attorneys were obligated under their approved contract not only to represent, but also to advise the widely scattered 35,000 members of the tribe. For example, the Commission refers to the activity of Attorney Pierce, who did most of this work. He devoted a minimum of 15,767 hours between 1948 and 1965, including 475 personal conferences with tribal members and others, and 2,539 letters to 785 individuals. This work was performed with no assurance that it would be paid for in any event, but it was an obligation under the contingent fee-contract, and was certainly done in good faith. We agree with the Commission that this was commendable, but we disagree with the conclusion that it should not be considered as an additional compensable activity.

We are of the same mind as to the refusal of the Commission to award any compensation for legislative work because it was not required in the prosecution of this claim. This work was deemed necessary by the tribe and its attorneys. Under the specific requirements of their approved fee-contract, it should have been considered in fixing the fee. For an allowance for legislative work and expenses under similar circumstances, see Confederated Bands of Ute Indians, supra.

Because of the successful negotiation of a stipulation with the Government, offsets claimed at $1,432,084.17 were reduced to $425,000.00. As Commissioner Scott has found, this resulted from the knowledge, ability and skill of appellant attorneys. The Government contends that this should be given no consideration because the determination of offsets was in another docket, No. 173-A, which was not concluded until 18 months after the final judgment in Docket 173. We do not agree. The net amount of this judgment was increased by $1,007,084.17 over the net judgment which would have resulted had the full amount of offsets claimed by defendant been allowed. This activity was essential to the successful end result of the prosecution of the claim. It should have been specifically considered by the Commission as a factor in the determination of the fee.

We also note that the Commission has not considered another fact referred to by Commissioner Scott in his dissent. As of December 31, 1963 the total accumulated interest borne from these tribal funds is $1,061,479.14. The early deposit of these funds in the Treasury upon the entry of judgment in 1961 resulted from actions following the expert judgment, advise and efforts of the appellant attorneys in view of the impoverished condition of the tribal entity, and this effort is entitled to consideration by the Commission in determining the fee-award.

The Commission refused to consider the time and activities devoted by counsel to the preparation and presentation of their claim for fees to the Commission because it is solely for their personal benefit. This work was required by the rules of the Commission. Rule 503.34b, Fed.Reg. No. 21, No. 216, November 6, 1956 Issue, and it is certainly a part of the services required of the attorneys in the prosecution of the claim.

The Commission has concluded that "most important of all is the fact that the Cherokee Nation under the Indian Claims Act had a sound cause of action." Actually, this was not a fact until these attorneys had first devoted much expert effort, research, and knowledge in the development of the case. In a broader sense, however, it is safe to assume that in all of the Indian claims cases where the attorneys were successful, they all had a sound cause of action. Another common factor applicable to all Indian claims cases is that, once a final award is made, no effort is required to collect the judgment, and yet the Commission notes this as "another item of considerable importance."

Appellee is correct in stating that we should not seek to impose our judgment in the matter. In remanding the case, we are not attempting to dictate either the fee-amount or percentage to be fixed by the Commission. However, adherence to the directives of section 15 of the Act, particularly as to conformity with the standards established in similar contingent claims in courts of law, and appropriate correction of the errors pointed out in this opinion should, in our opinion, result in a substantial increase in the fee awarded by the Commission. Accordingly, the determination by the Commission of the fee-award is reversed, and the case is remanded to the Commission for further proceedings to determine the fee-award in accordance with this opinion and sec. 15 of the Act.

See Chickasaw Nation v. United States, 121 Ct.Cl. 41, 47 (1951) (attorneys' fees); Seneca Nation v. United States, 122 Ct.Cl. 163 (1952) (prosecution of claim by individual member of tribe); McGhee v. Creek Nation and United States, 122 Ct.Cl. 380 (1952); cert. denied, 344 U.S. 856, 73 S.Ct. 91, 97 L.Ed. 665 (intervention); Delaware Tribe of Indians v. United States, 128 F.Supp. 391, 398, 130 Ct.Cl. 782, 794 (1955) (which entity can prosecute claim); Prairie Band of Potawatomi Indiana v. United States, 165 F.Supp. 139, 143 Ct. Cl. 131 (1958); cert. denied, 359 U.S. 908, 79 S.Ct. 587, 3 L.Ed.2d 574 (1959) (intervention); Blackfeet and Gros Ventre Tribes v. United States, 162 Ct.Cl. 136 (1963) (intervention); Red Lake, Pembina and White Earth Bands v. United States, 164 Ct.Cl. 389 (1964) (division of award and to whom award should be made). Cherokee Freedmen v. United States, 161 Ct.Cl. 787 (1963) (whether a claim is individual or tribal); Peoria Tribe v. United States, 169 Ct.Cl. 1009 (1965) (to whom award should be made); Minnesota Chippewa Tribe v. United States, 315 F.2d 906, 161 Ct.Cl. 258 (1963) (same); Spokane Tribe v. United States, 163 Ct.Cl. 58 (1963) (same); Absentee Shawnee Tribe v. United States, 165 Ct.Cl. 510 (1964) (whether a claim is individual or tribal; representation of tribe by a constituent part)

See also 14 Am.Jur.2d Champerty, § 4, p. 845. A contract for a contingent fee by which an attorney agrees to save his client harmless from costs and expenses of proposed litigation is void

Free Application Correspondence following Niebell Statement, letter February 18, 1963, Sol. Frank J. Barry to Paul M. Niebell

Two of the above cases, though unsuccessfully prosecuted, inured to the benefit of the Cherokee Nation in Docket 173, which resulted in the final judgment entered in Docket 173. Docket No. 2 settled for the first time the question of the Commission's jurisdiction under Section 2, Clauses 3 and 5 of the Indian Claims Commission Act, and determined that the new causes of action created for the first time by said Act, and not available to claimants in prior litigation, were notres judicata as a result of prior litigation of the same subject matter between the same parties; and reaffirmed the question of the nature of the title of the Cherokee Nation to its Outlet lands, the subject matter of Docket 173, with the Commission holding the Cherokee Nation had a fee simple title to its Outlet lands (2 Ind.Cl.Comm. 7), which decision was affirmed on appeal by the Court of Claims (124 Ct.Cl. 127). Docket No. 24 involved the question of title to Cherokee lands in Indian Territory, including their Outlet lands, and the construction of Cherokee Treaties with relation thereto (1 Ind.Cl.Com. 165 and 2 Ind.Cl.Comm. 37; 124 Ct.Cl. 315). These decisions were referred to and followed by the Commission in deciding the claim in Docket 173.

Crow Indian Tribe, Docket No. 54, Indian Claims Commission

Ute Indians v. United States, 45 Ct.Cl. 440 (1910); Klamath and Moadoc Tribes v. United States, 85 Ct.Cl. 451 (1937), affirmed 304 U.S. 119, 58 S.Ct. 799, 82 L.Ed. 1219 (1938); Ft. Berthold Indians v. United States, 71 Ct.Cl. 308 (1930)


text:
(click here if you would like to know more about this service)

Where are you from?

If you see this page, it means it was not possible to identify your institution automatically. Please select your institution from this list. You should only need to do this once during this session.

If your institution does not appear in the list above, it means it has not registered an OpenURL Resolver. You may be able to find the resource you are looking for by searching via your own institution's library web site.


text:
OphtahliX Inc.
AboutInvestor InformationContact

About OphthaliX

About Us

Company Leadership
- Management
- Drug Dev. Team
- Board of Directors

Board of Directors

Prof. Pnina Fishman, Ph.D., Chairman
Prof. Fishman is the Chairman and interim CEO of OphthaliX. Prof. Fishman is also the scientific founder and CEO of Can-Fite BioPharma and was previously a professor of Life Sciences and headed the Laboratory of Clinical and Tumor Immunology at the Felsenstein Medical Research Institute, Rabin Medical Center. Prof. Fishman is a very accomplished scientist and has authored or co-authored over 150 publications and presented the findings of her research at many major scientific meetings. Her past managerial experience included seven years as CEO of Mor Research Application (MRA), a company that was in charge of the commercialization of intellectual property from all hospitals and research centers of Clalit Health Services, the largest healthcare provider in Israel, and was also the first clinical CRO in Israel. She was also involved in the establishment and served on the Board of Directors of several life sciences technology start-ups.
Roger D. Kornberg, Ph.D.
Mr. Roger Kornberg  is the 2006 Nobel Prize winner in Chemistry (unshared). He is Winzer Professor in Medicine in the Department of Structural Biology at Stanford University. In his doctoral research, he demonstrated the diffusional motions of lipids in membranes, termed flip-flop and lateral diffusion. He was a postdoctoral fellow and member of the scientific staff at the Laboratory of Molecular biology in Cambridge, England from 1972-5, where he discovered the nucleosome, the basic unit of DNA coiling in chromosomes. He moved to his present position in 1978, where his research has focused on the mechanism and regulation of eukaryotic gene transcription. Notable findings include the demonstration of the role of nucleosomes in transcriptional regulation, the establishment of a yeast RNA polymerase II transcription system and the isolation of all the proteins involved, the discovery of the Mediator of transcriptional regulation, the development of two-dimensional protein crystallization and its application to transcription proteins, and the atomic structure determination of an RNA polymerase II transcribing complex.
Kornberg was elected to the National Academy of Sciences in 1993. He has received many awards, including the 2001 Welch prize, highest award in chemistry in the United States, the 2002 Leopold Mayer Prize, highest award in biomedical sciences of the French Academy of Sciences, and the 2006 Nobel Prize in Chemistry (unshared)
Ilan Cohn, Ph.D.
Dr. Ilan Cohn is a co-founder of the company and it’s Vice Chairman. Dr. Cohn is a senior partner of Reinhold Cohn & Partners the largest IP firm in Israel. He manages the life sciences and chemistry department of Reinhold Cohn, which includes a very large staff of patent attorneys, trainees, paralegals, and assistant staff. Dr. Cohn, has many years of experience in the field of patents and other intellectual property fields. Additionally, in the course of his professional career Ilan gained significant experience and expertise in turning intellectual property assets, particularly patents into a first tier asset. He holds a Ph.D. in biology. He served on the board of directors of a number of life science companies in Israel and in the USA. He was also involved in the past in management of VC funds focused on investment in the field of the life sciences. Dr. Cohn served a number of years as a co-chairman of the Biotech Committee of the US-Israeli Science and Technology Commission.
Guy Regev
Mr. Guy Regev is currently the Chief Executive Officer of Shaked Global Group, a privately-held equity investment firm that provides value added capital to environmental related companies and technologies. Shaked Global Group is a major shareholder in Can-Fite BioPharma and Mr. Regev is a director of Can-Fite. Mr. Regev has over 12 years of experience in accounting, financial management and control and general management of commercial enterprises. Prior to joining Shaked, Mr. Regev was Vice President, commercial business, at Housing & Construction Holding (“HCH”), Israel’s largest infrastructure company... Between 1999 and 2001, Mr. Regev was a manager at Deloitte & Touche, Israel. Mr. Regev holds an LLB degree in Law (Israel) and is a licensed lawyer and has been a licensed CPA since 1999.
Michael Belkin, Ph.D.
Dr. Michael Belkin is a Professor of Ophthalmology at Tel Aviv University in Tel Aviv, Israel, and the Director of the Ophthalmic Technologies Laboratory at the university’s Eye Research Institute at the Sheba Medical Center. He was awarded a master’s degree in natural sciences by Cambridge University, England, and received a doctorate in medicine from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. Dr. Belkin served previously as Director of Research, Development and Non-Conventional Warfare Medicine in the Israel Defense Forces Medical Corps. He was also the first full-time Director of the Tel Aviv University Eye Research Institute, Chairman of the Tel-Aviv University Department of Ophthalmology and the President of the Israel Society of Eye and Vision Research, of which he was one of the founders. Dr. Belkin is an author of over 250 scientific publications and 20 patents. He is an internationally recognized eye researcher and has received various research awards. He is an entrepreneur and advisor of several ophthalmic companies in the fields of lasers, optics, ophthalmic devices, pharmaceutics and biotechnology. One of his ideas, the ExPRESS miniature glaucoma shunt, is currently used worldwide. Dr. Belkin is an active, long-standing, member of the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO), the American Academy of Ophthalmology, the Biomedical Optics Society section of the International Society of Optical Engineering (SPIE), the American Glaucoma Society and many others. He serves as chairman and member of various international and local scientific and professional committees as well as scientific journals’ editorial boards.


text:
Friday, July 29, 2005

Veteran's Administration Buprenorphine Criteria

Veteran's Administration (VA)criteria/directive of June 2003 (apparently not modified since) re buprenorphine for opiate dependence. Some highlights:

"In general, methadone should remain the substitution treatment of choice."

"... in the the VA, the limit of 30 patients applies only to individual physicians. There is no limit on the number of patients that can be treated with buprenorphine for group practices."

"The criteria for . . . buprenorphine require that a patient have a documented severe, uncontrollable adverse effect or true hypersensitivity to methadone or LAAM before the physician considers switching to buprenorphine. Patients who are stable on methadone or LAAM maintenance and who do not have a compelling reason to switch therapy should continue maintenance on methadone or LAAM."

Cost paid by the VA system for one month buprenorphine/naloxone tab, 16mg/d, is $176; for methadone, 80 mg = $10/mon if purchased as tablets, $8 if purchased as concentrate

Tuesday, July 26, 2005

Drug Testing in High School

Today's blog contains a relevant Letter-to-the-Editor, that was never published nor answered...

An article appeared in the Marion Star Newspaper (Ohio) concerning drug testing in high school. The article stated that random drug testing could be done more than once a year in upwards of 25 percent of extracurricular participants. Testing would include alcohol, amphetamines, anabolic steroids, barbiturates, cocaine, LSD, marijuana, methadone, MDMA (ecstasy), nicotine, opiates…. Those who refuse to submit to testing would not be allowed to participate in their extracurricular activity, those failing a random test would be subject to disciplinary action including counseling and suspension from their activity.

The rationale for subjecting students to drug testing would be a bit more persuasive if tests were administered as well to all teachers and school administrators – and to parents. Surely the consequence of drug use on the kids and the community is far greater when it exists in those folks than among students.

Wednesday, July 13, 2005

A colleague from Australia, Andrew Byrne, calls attention to an article in the current Brit J Gen Practice (June 05) by Strang et al. The authors surveyed private physicians in UK who prescribe methadone maintenance, and found a mean daily dose of 36.9. It's been shown consistently (no exceptions, I believe!) for many years that for the great majority of patients doses under 60 are sub-optimal, and that many patients require daily doses of at least 100mg (any many a great deal higher). It's difficult to comprehend such apparent bias against reliance on dosages that will, predictably, be associated with persistent illicit opiate use and the substantial risk of illness and death. Sure - the refusal of methadone providers to practice evidence-based medicine is almost universal, but one might have expected better from the UK, where over 50% of GPs reported treating "at least one opiate dependent person" - presumably with methadone.

So . . . anyone offer an explanation? Anyone have suggestions regarding how to address a problem that has been associated with methadone treatment for many decades despite uncontested evidence that it is wrong? rnewman

Monday, July 11, 2005

J Addict Dis 2005; 24(2):135 has an abstract from the Betty Ford Center describing a comparison trial of inpatient detox using buprenorphine vs. "a standard phenobarbital protocol." Anyone out there know of any current theoretical, pharmacological or empirical basis for using phenobarb for the "standard" detoxification of opiate-dependent individuals?

Monday, July 04, 2005

singing for support

LIVE EIGHT has been a magnificent effort to generate support for the impoverished in Africa. Question: how come no one is singing for opiate-dependent people around the world who desperately want and need help, and for whom effective help (especiallyopiate agonist treatment) is known to exist, but who have no access? Sure, untreated heroin addicts in Hanoi, Delhi, Kazan, Kiev - AND New York - are not very sympathetic in the eyes on the general public, but heightening awareness and generating support where none has existed is precisely what international events like Live Eight are designed to generate. So . . . where's the support, in song or in words, for opiate-addicted persons who currently have no prospect of help or hope? rnewman