text:
LINEEX (Valencia, Spain)

LINEEX is the Laboratory for Research in Experimental Economics, a research facility of ERI-CES (the Center for Research in Social and Economic Behavior, at the University of Valencia). During the last year, LINEEX has run more than 100 experimental session with more than 4.000 experimental subjects.

LINEEX’s IT infrastructures provides the research team with the most appropriate technical resources to design, develop and run economic experiments. LINEEX is one of the largest laboratories in the world, with a main room with an 8×8 matrix of workstations (64 computers). It is a permanent research facility used by worldwide experimentalists. Besides this offline capability, LINEEX is used to programme online experiments using its mobile laboratory composed 12 laptops and 30 tablets.

At the outset LINEEX worked with z-Tree, the most common toolbox programmed in C++ for economic experiments. Although it is still being used for many experiments, LINEEX has updated its capabilities and is now able to programme Web experiments in Yii (A high-performance PHP, JavaScript, jQuery and HTML framework best for developing Web 2.0 applications) and Android thought Java language. Hardware and software are installed, maintained and supported by the IT department who is also able to assist users and experimentalists on their projects.

LINEEX has five servers hosting different computing purposes. One of them is a virtual server hosted by the computing centre of the University of Valencia, and provides the highest standards in computing capacity, real time monitorization, reliability and security. It is connected by a super-high bandwidth connection to the Spanish academic and research network (RedIRIS), which is also connected to the main European and worldwide research networks. The other four are located in LINEEX servers’ room, all of them composed by quad-core server-specific processors. They are used to perform different tasks, (i.e) solving mathematical programming problems, running simulations, implementing complex data analysis, big data processing, testing our in-development web applications or serving as a software repository. One of these four also performs periodic backups of all the data generated in the lab, and adequately stores it in a set of network hard drivers (4 TB in total), remotely accessible and user/password protected. All servers and information contained fully accomplish Spanish regulation in terms of NDA and data protection.

For further information please visit the LINEEX website.

NECTUNT (Zaragoza, Spain)

Nectunt Lab is devoted to the study of cooperative behavior in diverse scientific fields, including the biological and social sciences. Methodologically, we make use of evolutionary game theory and computer simulations to build models that are informed by our findings in controlled experiments, both on-site and online, where we study how humans behave in a number of strategic situations and scenarios. Eventually, a better understanding of humans’ behavioral responses could help developing the largest simulator of human behavior up to date, with the ultimate goal of answering questions such as: What are the mechanisms and real motivations that promote the emergence and evolution of cooperation in humans? How individuals behave in different contexts? How financial bubbles are formed? How does the group size influence collective behavior?

In order to perform our experiments, we are now asking volunteers to subscribe to our Lab database. Help us and join the team by volunteering to the experiments. You will be paid! Please, check the info below to know how to join. And thanks for your cooperation.

For further information please visit the NECTUNT website.

LEE (Getafe, España)

Currently, the use of laboratory experiments to study economic phenomena is a common practice. Conducting laboratory experiments allows for the generation of data while controlling for aspects of the environment that are unobservable in real economic situations. Researchers of the Department / Institute of Economics frequently conduct laboratory experiments.  Participants of LEE experiments receive monetary compensation and have the opportunity to see economic theory in action.
For further information please visit the LEE website.

CeNDEF-CREED (Amsterdam, Netherlands)

The Center of Nonlinear Dynamics in Economics and Finance is a research institute at the Faculty of Economics and Business at the University of Amsterdam. At CeNDEF senior researchers, post-doctoral research fellows and PhD students work on complex economic systems from an interdisciplinary perspective. The research also involves experiments which are carried out at  The Center for Research in Experimental Economics and Political Decision making (CREED) lab. CREED is a research institute at the Faculty of Economics and Econometrics, University of Amsterdam. Its research program consists of three main projects:

  1. Economics of Political Decision Making. The project focuses on the analysis of the behavior of political decision makers, its consequences for government policies, and the impact on the economy.

  2. Bounded Rationality and Institutions. In this project fundamental aspects of individual decision making are investigated.

  3. Experimental Economics.Here the method of laboratory experimentation is used to study economic problems. Research in this project is particularly stimulated by, and provides feedback for, the two projects mentioned above.

CREED has two laboratories and one reception room in which the subjects can be briefed before the experiment starts (conveniently between the two laboratories). One lab has 32 cubicles with computers and the other one 23 cubicles. Both laboratories are connected to the same network and fileserver which makes it possible to run sessions with up to 55 participants. All computers have Windows installed. In addition we have a mobile lab for outdoor experiments using a wireless network, with 20 MacBooks which can run mac OSX or Windows.

For further information please visit the  CeNDEF  and the  CREED websites or  contact us at

CEBEG (Cambridge, United Kingdom)

The Cambridge Experimental and Behavioural Economics Group (CEBEG) is a research group established to facilitate and advance experimental research in economics and management at the University of Cambridge.

Apart from bringing together researchers who are interested in experimental research in the social sciences arena, CEBEG provides an experimental laboratory and a subject pool database for University members. CEBEG is a joint initiative between the Faculty of Economics and Cambridge Judge Business School, both departments of the University of Cambridge. Within the Faculty of Economics, CEBEG sits under the aegis of the Centre for Research in Microeconomics (CReMic).

Features of CEBEG:

  • Lab space with 26 computers, equipped with z-Tree (Zurich Toolbox for Readymade Economic Experiments) experimental software. Researchers can run both stand-alone and networked experiments. There is also space for experiments involving personal interaction or team work
  • A participant pool of over 600 members mostly comprised of University of Cambridge students. Invitations for experiments can be sent to the entire participant pool or can be targeted based on gender, age, and other characteristics
  • An online registration system that enables researchers and participants to conveniently schedule and sign up for experiments
  • Regular workshops and other interdisciplinary platforms to exchange knowledge on social science experiments
For further information please visit the CEBEG website.


Content-Type: application/http; msgtype=response

WARC-Identified-Payload-Type: text/html

WARC-Type: response

text:
IBSEN is a project funded by Horizon 2020, the biggest EU Research and Innovation Programme. Our goal is  to develop a human behavior simulator, a technology providing a basis for socio-economic simulations that would radically change many fields.

In a pioneering and innovating manner, we will carry out experiments in online sessions with +10.000 participants all over 5 different countries. Besides, more traditional offline sessions will be held in the different labs provided by the partner’s institutions. Every participant will receive an economic reward for their help!

Benefits of your participation

1) You will contribute to the development of Science.

2) Your participation will help scientist to create models for a better understanding of policies and Society.

3) You will receive an economic reward.

How can I participate in IBSEN?

It couldn’t be easier! Just follow this link and register to be included in the participants data base of IBSEN. Once an experimental session is open, starting in a few weeks, you will receive all the information via e-mail and  your social networks (Twitter, Facebook…). Then, all you have to do is to register for the sessions you are interested in before all vacancies are completed. The participation in these sessions, which  have been approved by the corresponding Ethics Committee, involves uniquely simple decisions in modeled situations. Every data collected will be treated anonymously so your privacy is guaranteed.

Follow us and share this fantastic opportunity!

Twitter                                                            Facebook

warcinfo:
robots: classic
hostname: ip-10-228-65-216.ec2.internal
software: Nutch 1.6 (CC)
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2018-09
operator: Common Crawl Admin
description: Wide crawl of the web for February 2018
publisher: Common Crawl
format: WARC File Format 1.0
conformsTo: http://bibnum.bnf.fr/WARC/WARC_ISO_28500_version1_latestdraft.pdf


text:
Skip to content

Infectious Diseases of Poverty

Open Access

Ecohealth research in Southeast Asia: past, present and the way forward

Infectious Diseases of Poverty20154:5

Received: 24 August 2014

Accepted: 25 December 2014

Published: 29 January 2015

Ecohealth is a comprehensive approach to understanding health at its human, animal and environmental interface in a socio-ecological systems context. This approach was introduced widely in Southeast Asia (SEA) by the Canadian International Development Research Centre (IDRC) in the late 2000s. Aimed at addressing the problem of emerging infectious diseases (EIDs), numerous such projects and activities have been generated throughout the region. Ecohealth is increasingly converging with the One Health approach, as both movements emphasise a holistic understanding to health. We conducted a scoping review by considering all of the Ecohealth programmes, initiatives and projects that have been implemented in SEA since the introduction of the approach, and also gathered information from peer-reviewed literature. The objective of this paper is to review Ecohealth activities within SEA over the last 10 years to address the lessons learned, challenges faced and the way forward for Ecohealth in the region. Activities range from those focusing purely on capacity, projects focusing on research and projects covering both. Achievements to date include, for example, research contributing to the field of infectious diseases in relation to social ecological factors and associated urbanisation and agricultural intensification. Challenges remain at the project design and implementation level, in the available capacity and coordination to develop Ecohealth research teams in the countries, gauging teams’ assimilation of Ecohealth’s underlying tenets and their translation into sustainable disease prevention and control, as well as in the ability to scale up Ecohealth projects. We suggest that the way forward for Ecohealth should be from a regional perspective in terms of research, training and policy translation using Ecohealth in combination with the One Health approach.

EcohealthOne healthSoutheast AsiaInterdisciplinaryTransdisciplinaryScientific partnershipCapacity buildingNetworkEcohealth content

Multilingual abstracts

Please see Additional file 1 for translation of the abstract into the six official working languages of the United Nations.

Ecosystem approaches to human health, or the Ecohealth approach championed by the Canadian International Development Research Centre (IDRC) is action-based research premised on the notion that human health and development depends on healthy ecosystems. Ecohealth approaches stress that the currently poor state of many of the world’s ecosystems is hindering efforts to improve global health and economic and human development [1]. While the IDRC began developing the Ecohealth approach in Latin America and Africa in the 1990s, its introduction in Southeast Asia (SEA) was more recent, during the late 2000s. The introduction of Ecohealth in SEA was largely stimulated by the emergence of avian influenza, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) and other persistent zoonotic diseases in the region as SEA is a hotspot for infectious diseases. However, it is noted that Ecohealth is not only concerned with infectious diseases but also used to deal with wider environmental issues including chemical contamination. The dynamic landscape of research and application of the approach provides a wider space to address the interlinkages of health and the environment. These are particularly acute in SEA where rapid agricultural intensification, rural–urban transitions and climate change are having profound effects on ecosystems and health.

A similar multi-disciplinary, multi-sectorial and systems-based approach known as One Health was also widely promoted in the SEA in the early 2000s in the wake of the SARS and highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) epidemics. The One Health approach shares similar values to Ecohealth and the parallels in both approaches have recently led to an increasing convergence of the two. This has led to a broader discipline incorporating infectious and non-infectious diseases, epidemiological and ecological methods, and disease control and development [2]. In SEA, One Health has been introduced mainly by USAID EPT (Emerging Pandemic Threats) RESPOND programme, and partly by the World Health Organization (WHO), the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) and the World Organization for Animal Health (OIE). As One Health activities are much more recent and have not involved research or intervention projects, they more frequently focus on network building. This is the reason that we did not examine One Health in depth but focused solely on Ecohealth, although these two approaches are similar. The objective of this paper is to review Ecohealth activities in SEA over the last 10 years to address the lessons learned, challenges faced and the way forward for Ecohealth in the region.

For the purposes of this scoping review, we considered all of the Ecohealth programmes, initiatives and projects stimulated by or associated with the IDRC in SEA over the last decade. We obtained from the IDRC a list of all programmes, projects and initiatives funded by or affiliated with the IDRC Ecohealth Programme, as well as associated programmes utilising the Ecohealth approach. The main projects considered are shown in Table 1.
Table 1

Ecohealth projects, countries involved and types of projects

Project name

Countries involved

Project type

Asia Partnership on Emerging Infectious Diseases Research (APEIR)

Communication and knowledge sharing to reduce the threat of EIDs using a ’trust-based’ bottom-up approach. Focusing on avian influenza and expanded to other EIDs.

Thailand, Vietnam, Indonesia, China, Laos, Malaysia

Ecohealth Emerging Infectious Diseases Research Initiative (EcoEID)

Understand the relationship between EIDs and agricultural, land utilisation and ecosystem management practices.

Thailand, Vietnam, Indonesia, China, Laos, Philippines

Ecosystem Approaches to the Better Management of Zoonotic Emerging Infectious Diseases in the Southeast Asia Region (EcoZD)

Increase the knowledge, skills, and capacity of research and infectious disease control personnel in SEA to understand the risks and impacts of Zoonotic Emerging Infectious Diseases (ZEIDs).

Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, Indonesia, China, Thailand

Research–Capacity building

Eco-Bio-Social dengue control programmes

Combine the social and ecological dimensions of the emergence of dengue fever.

Thailand, Vietnam, Indonesia, China, Laos, Philippines

Research – Capacity building

Lawa Model: Integrated Opisthorchiasis Control in Northeast Thailand

Strategies for controlling the liver fluke infection using the Ecohealth/One Health approach.

Operational Research

O. viverrini

The Research Institute for Humanity and Nature (RIHN) project

Liver fluke infection in the lowland area of the Savannakhet Province in relation to the development of wet rice field and irrigation systems.

Lao PDR, Vietnam, Bangladesh, Yunnan China

Building Ecohealth Capacity in Asia (BECA)

Building capacity in Ecohealth at different individual and institution levels.

Thailand, Laos, Cambodia, Vietnam, China

Capacity building

The Field Building Leadership Initiative in Southeast Asia (FBLI)

Research focus is on solving human health problems associated with agricultural intensification in SEA.

Thailand, Indonesia, Vietnam, China

Research – Capacity building

Agriculture and Health

Strengthen the capacity for Ecohealth research. Facilitate networks and knowledge sharing to mainstream Ecohealth and engage policy makers.

Integrated assessment of environmental sanitation and health (NCCR North–South)

Develop a conceptual framework for improving health and environmental sanitation using an approach combining health, ecological and socio-economic assessments.

Vietnam, Thailand

Operational research

Agriculture and Health

Land Use Change and Human Health in the Eastern Himalayas: An Adaptive Ecosystem Approach

Reduce the vulnerability of mountain people to human health issues caused by land use change.

Nepal, Yunnan Province, Tibetan Autonomous Region of China

Agriculture and Health

In addition, we conducted a literature search of peer-reviewed papers in electronic databases for the period up to June 2014. The purpose of the search and literature review was to assemble published articles and reports associated with these projects, as well as to identify any that were not affiliated with the IDRC or its partner agencies. The three main databases used in the search procedure were PubMed, ScienceDirect and ISI Web of Science. We employed the keywords: ’Ecohealth’, ’Ecosystem approach to health’, ’Southeast Asia’ and the specific names of Southeast Asian countries (e.g. Vietnam, Thailand, Indonesia etc.). These keywords were entered into the ’Title’, ’Abstract’ and ’Keywords’ fields in the databases. Through this search, we obtained a total of 70 results, which were screened for relevancy, resulting in a total of 21 papers that we analysed for this paper. In addition to the peer-reviewed literature, we also explored the grey literature on Ecohealth that was related to the Ecohealth projects mentioned above and found five reports that were not related to the IDRC projects. This included a review funded by the Australian Agency for International Development (AusAID), the National Centre of Competence in Research (NCCR) North–South programme and the US National Science Foundation (NSF). We also spoke to Ecohealth experts from Thailand, Indonesia, Philippines, Japan, Australia and Canada.

History of ecohealth in the region

Ecohealth evolved in the mid-1990s as a paradigm conceived by IDRC scientists to better understand the linkages between nature, society and health [3]. Despite being relatively new and introduced in SEA in the mid-2000s, a comparatively expansive portfolio of activities has been stimulated. The first activity began in SEA in 2005 initiated by the IDRC, as a response to the outbreaks of SARS and avian influenza, with the establishment of the Asia Partnership on Emerging Infectious Diseases Research (APEIR) that is, as of 2014, active in five countries. The same year, the WHO Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (WHO-TDR) and the IDRC released a request for applications for the Eco-Bio-Social Dengue Initiative. This was launched in 2006 with a proposal development meeting held in Bangkok in early May 2006. In April 2007, in cooperation with the WHO-TDR, a workshop attended by research teams from six countries was organised and led by Pattamaporn Kittayapong and Bruce Wilcox at Mahidol University, Bangkok. The workshop represented a comprehensive introduction to the Ecohealth approach, including transdisciplinary ecological principles, the ecosystem concept and landscape mapping protocols relevant to dengue vector ecology.

Development of the workshop and training manual [4] was associated with a graduate education and research training programme (funded by the US NSF). This included the establishment of the first university course on Ecohealth and emerging infectious diseases (EIDs) entitled, ’Systems Ecology and Emerging Infectious Diseases’ in the Faculty of Sciences, Mahidol University, which is being developed and will be taught by Kittayapong and Wilcox.

The 2005 symposium, ’EID and Social Ecological Systems in Asia’, funded by the US National Institutes of Health’s (NIH’s) Roadmap to the Future Program, was an important stimulus for these and other activities, organised by the founding editor-in-chief and managing editor of the journal EcoHealth, Wilcox and Margot Parkes, respectively. This symposium included the participation of IDRC-affiliated scientists, as well as many of the academic leaders in Ecohealth at the time. The symposium’s outputs included a number of Ecohealth research syntheses and associated frameworks linking theory and practice [57], some strongly influencing activities in SEA. Interestingly, EcoHealth’s parent organisation, the International Association for Ecology and Health, also had a strong Asian link as its three founding officers, Wilcox, Parkes and Pierre Horwitz, were all based in the Asia-Oceania region at the time.

Subsequent research in Thailand focusing on mosquito-borne diseases [8, 9] and in Vietnam on avian influenza (H5N1) [10, 11] (the latter supported separately by the NSF’s Coupled Human Natural Systems Program) are framed explicitly on the basis of the EIDs research ’blue print’ that emerged from this symposium [7]. Fundamentally, the Wilcox-Gubler-Colwell model represents a social ecological systems framework for investigating the roles and interaction of urbanisation, agricultural intensification and habitat degradation, as well as their associated drivers and influences, in infectious disease re-emergence or emergence.

The above events that were scholarly in nature helped to both catalyse and lay the foundation for an expanding cluster of evolving academic research and graduate training activities in SEA. Distinct from these activities, although with some overlap of personnel and institutions, are projects principally championed by the IDRC, representing a combination of research, intervention, policy and capacity building. It is these distinctly ’ecosystem approach to health’ projects focusing on ’real life’ problems (in contrast to academic research questions) carried out largely outside university research settings that are the subject of this survey. Table 1 shows a summary of these Ecohealth projects with the main objectives as were stated in the project documents, as well as the type of projects they are.

Ecohealth and emerging infectious research and policy

Southeast Asia is considered to be a hotspot for EIDs, specifically zoonotic and other vector-borne diseases [12, 13]. Rapid human population growth along with global and regional environmental changes are thought to be the main drivers, along with influencing factors including increasing human migration and global transport of people and goods, urbanisation, agricultural intensification and possibly climate change, are contributing to the re-emergence and newly emerging infectious diseases [1316]. During the last decade, notable viruses, particularly SARS, avian influenza A H5N1, pandemic influenza A H1N1 and dengue fever, have attracted international attention and have had severe health and economic impacts in SEA [12, 13]. Projects throughout the region have worked to integrate an Ecohealth approach to the increasing (re)-emergence of infectious diseases to engage with their ecological and social factors.

In 2009, AusAID and the IDRC conducted a baseline assessment to evaluate past, current and emerging EID-related research for the Asia Pacific region [16]. It focused on country surveys in nine selected countries: Australia, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Republic of Palau, Philippines, Thailand and Vietnam, to determine the extent of cross-sectional research examining Ecohealth and EIDs. The research team used a multi-stakeholder and multidisciplinary approach to collect, process, analyse and synthesise relevant data. The study found that there was a wide range in the extent of EID-related research and that there were gaps in knowledge about animal and environmental factors relating to the emergence of infectious diseases. Some of the barriers to research on EIDs were: a lack surveillance capacity and human resources, the reliance on foreign researchers, unreliable funding, minimal career incentives, and limited access to libraries and scientific journals. However, despite these challenges, the study found several integrated pilot or demonstration projects being conducted in SEA [16].

The Asia Partnership on Emerging Infectious Diseases Research (APEIR) was established 2006 to promote regional collaboration in avian influenza research. In 2009, as a response to H1N1 (swine flu), the network expanded its scope to promote Ecohealth and One Health concepts for all EIDs. Using a ’trust-based’ bottom-up approach, the APEIR works to facilitate knowledge generation, management, translation and capacity building to reduce the threat of EIDs [17, 18]. The APEIR has completed five IDRC-funded regional research projects that have yielded a number of outputs in published books, peer-reviewed scientific journal articles, reports, etc. [1921]. Table 2 shows a summary of the research methods and findings of the completed projects. The APEIR is currently in its second phase with two ongoing studies (2013–2016) focusing on reducing biosecurity threats from infectious diseases and on the proper use of antimicrobials in humans and animals to control antimicrobial resistance in SEA. Research findings from these two studies have not yet been produced.
Table 2

The APEIR completed projects

APEIR sub-project

Research issues

Research method

Findings (where applicable)

Migratory birds & AI network

What is the role of birds in spreading AI?

Documentary reviews; Wild birds capture and identification; and Cloacal/tracheal swabs, serology sampling GIS, satellite tracking.

It is not clear whether the wild birds are the source of poultry infection; major wild bird migration routes along the central Asia flyway overlap with areas that have experienced avian influenza outbreaks in poultry in Tibet.

What are the AI viruses in wild birds?

What species of birds are infected?

Socio-economic impacts of AI

How households’ livelihood and wellbeing are affected by AI and AI control measures.

Cross-country comparisons of household level data; Structured-interviews/ group discussions; and ST social, economic issues related to AI control.

The backyard poultry sector is resistant to shock but the small-scale commercial sector is vulnerable.

Farmers considered the compensation rate for culling of poultry during the HPAI outbreak to be inadequate – discouraged farmers to apply control measures and not hide/sell their infected poultry.

Backyard poultry systems & AI

What are characteristics & dynamics of BP systems?

Mixed methods: farmer interviews, direct observation, focus group discussions (FGDs); Design and test models; and Cross-country comparisons.

Data on the characteristics and economics of smallholder and backyard producers provided valuable information for policy makers.

What are the marketing networks?

Biosecurity is generally quite low in both smallholder and larger commercial farms.

What are some effective/feasible ways to reduce AI risk?

How can these be tested in practice?

Policy analysis

What are antiviral drug and poultry vaccination policies?

Documentary search; Stakeholder analysis; Semi-structured interviews; A series of meetings with key informants to explore issues in policy formulation and sequence of events surrounding them); and Cross-country comparisons.

Scientific evidence plays a role in related discussions, but national economic interest is important.

What are the contextual factors influencing/the process and development of policies?

Technical information on use of vaccination of poultry for H5N1 HPAI was interpreted differently in Thailand as compared to Vietnam and Indonesia, resulting in different conclusions on its utility.

What are differences and similarities in policy/context/process among the three countries?

Effectiveness of AI control measures

What measures have been recommended & implemented?

Literature reviews to prioritise CMs FGDs and observation; Risk assessment & estimate effect of control measures(CMs) on risk; Province in-depth case studies; Cross-country comparisons; and Farms & districts as systems.

Control of highly pathogenic avian influenza was achieved, despite poorly implemented control measures.

How have these been implemented?

Vaccination in Vietnam and China did not prevent all cases of infection, but played a role in reducing disease levels.

What is impact on risk reduction?

Poultry vaccination has reduced the occurrence of outbreaks in Vietnam and China, but it may be masking virus presence.

Reliance on mass vaccination is leading to neglect of other measures.

Poultry Production Clusters (PPCs)

What is impact of these PPCs on the socio-economic status of the producers?

Survey on impacts of PPCs (PRA case study, FGDs, interview, observation), pilot intervention in PPCs; Dissemination and advocacy; and Look at impact on all related aspects.

Poultry Production Clusters (PPCs) have developed industrial production of poultry, improved farms’ economic efficiency and controlled diseases.

What changes in attitudes, behaviours and relations among various stakeholder groups induced by the development of PPCs?

Evidence of economies of the scope for PPCs in terms of access to feed at lower cost and more stable output price. Farms benefit from social changes in PPCs through better information sharing and cooperative activities in feed use, disease control and infrastructure development.

What are Ecohealth pilot interventions to improve the livelihoods of small producers?

Poultry inside PPCs are less likely to get infected with diseases.

Small-Scale Poultry Slaughter Houses

What is the hygienic status in small-scale poultry slaughterhouses and their effects on ecological and health in the community?

Interviews, FGDs; Observation; Collecting the sample from slaughterhouse (SH)/laboratory test systems: SH, traders, retailed, people living around the SH.

High prevalence of Salmonella contamination of carcasses in the poor hygienic conditions of the small-scale poultry slaughter houses.

Serotyping revealed the presence of S. enteritidis and S. typhimurium, which were potentially food poisoning microorganisms, and presumably contaminated from poultry flora due to slaughtering performance.

Water source and waste appeared to be the most important factors correlating to the Salmonella contamination.

The Eco-Bio-Social Dengue (EBS) Initiative ran largely parallel with the first APEIR projects, though it ended in 2011 [22]. The initial aim of the EBS Initiative was to contribute to ’improved dengue prevention by better understanding its ecosystem-related, biological and social (’eco-bio-social’) determinants and to develop and evaluate community-centred ecosystem management interventions, embracing public intersectoral actions, to reduce dengue transmission below threshold levels for epidemic outbreaks’ [23]. The six country teams selected for participation were from India, Sri Lanka, Indonesia, Myanmar, Philippines and Thailand. The teams met together with the TDR project managers and one of more external advisors in workshop settings annually in different locations in Asia hosted by country teams. The TDR referred to these as community of practice (CoP) meetings, with the intent of facilitating the establishment of a regional community of researchers interested in applying the Ecohealth approach to dengue control.

The country projects, each focused on urban or peri-urban study areas with a history of high incidence of dengue, and followed a core protocol including conceptual framework for the eco-bio-social approach, along with specific sampling design provided by the WHO-TDR [23]. The approach combined standard methods from an epidemiology study design for household demographic and larval surveys with novel social science-based community participatory methods. It was interdisciplinary (did not employ a transdisciplinary approach), seeking to combine disciplinary methods that were complementary. The conceptual framework and study design was based largely on the WHO’s Integrated Vector Management (IVM) approach with added attention to socio-cultural aspects pertinent to community participation. It did not incorporate the ecosystem concept nor was it framed using a systems perspective [23].

The projects under the EBS Initiative were originally planned for two years: a one-year study and an intervention planning phase followed by an implementation phase in the second year. As prescribed by the WHO-TDR, each of the country teams undertook a situational analysis. This included environmental characterisation and mapping of their study areas, and assessing vector abundance in relation to season and breeding container types. This was complemented by data and its analysis of the social and cultural context, with the objective of understanding stakeholder community and gender implications for vector control. The intervention phase using tools appropriate to local contexts were selected and employed cooperatively with community participants. Measurable outcomes were achieved locally in both the reduction of mosquitoes and the community participants’ interest and understanding of effective vector control measures. Country project outcomes are summarised by Sommerfeld and Kroeger [22] with accompanying articles in the same issue. It is not clear from the report whether the control efforts put in place will be sustained.

The Ecohealth Emerging Infectious Diseases Research Initiative (EcoEID), funded by the Department of Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development Canada (DFATD), AusAID and the IDRC, was launched in 2010 to enhance the response capacity to the threats of EIDs. After a competitive call for research proposals, three multi-country and multi-disciplinary research proposals spanning seven countries in SEA were selected [24]. The first of these, ’Innovative Strategies for the Sustainable Control of Asian Schistosomiasis and Other Helminth Zoonoses’, focuses on diseases caused by parasitic worms. Its aim is to better understand disease risk, including the ecological and socio-economic determinants of transmission in local contexts. Cost-effective interventions to increase community awareness and enhance local response capacity will then be implemented on this basis. The second project, ’Application of an Eco-Bio-Social Approach to Emerging Infectious Diseases in Southeast Asian Global Outreach Hotspots’, aims to explore the dynamics between EIDs, tourism and development. The project has three objectives: (1) to change local health and development policies, (2) to create integrated disease surveillance systems in tourist destinations, and (3) to strengthen the capacity to develop integrated and multi-sectorial intervention approaches [25]. The final selected project, ’Poultry Production Clusters’, will examine the impacts of concentrated poultry production on farmers’ livelihoods, the environment and disease risks. The project aims to build greater government support for local poultry farmers, improve the livelihood of the farmers, strengthen national and regional policies on poultry production and enhance the understanding of how agriculture can contribute to improved health. These three projects are ongoing, with completion dates scheduled for the end of 2014.

The ’Ecosystem Approach to the Better Management of Zoonotic Emerging Infectious Diseases in the Southeast Asia Region (EcoZD)’ was a programme operated by the International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI) with funding from the IDRC from 2007 to 2013. It aimed to promote and facilitate sustainable management practices for priority and emerging zoonoses, and to strengthen networks of stakeholders to develop capacities and communication strategies [26]. Applying ’a learning by doing’ Ecohealth and One Health approach, the completed project produced multiple research outputs in six pilot countries. Table 3 provides a brief overview of the country specific projects and the Vietnam team also provided an excellent example of utilising various approaches to addressing interdisciplinary strengthening and differences in priorities. At the project level, behaviour changes in country teams were documented in three key areas: understanding and applying Ecohealth principles, communication of research findings as a part of stakeholder outreach and the knowledge translation process, and networking and policy engagement [27]. Although the program formally ended, related activities continue on a smaller scale, funded by the CGIAR Research Program on Agriculture for Nutrition and Health [28].
Table 3

Overview of country-specific EcoZD projects

Research focus

Research methods

Risks of zoonotic diarrhoea in rural households

Household questionnaires and biological sampling.

Humans were rarely isolated from animals facilitating disease transmission.

Generating evidence on dog movement and behaviour

Surveys for dog demography, fecundity, movement and gathering socio-cultural data.

Disproved that dogs were spreading rabies across the island and that culling dogs would control rabies.

Pig zoonosis

Questionnaires and biological sampling of serum for pigs and humans.

Zoonoses from pigs were common in rural areas Much of the disease burden was related to poor awareness.

Microbiological contamination in poultry and water

Quantifying the microbiological contamination; Focus groups.

Salmonella spp. was an important hazard for small-scale chicken slaughterhouses.

Exposure to leptospirosis

Retrospective study; Questionnaire; and Biological sampling.

Exposure was common but infected pigs did not pose a significant risk to humans; rather both pigs and people had risk factors related to environmental sources of infection.

China (Yunnan Province)

Whether brucellosis was a zoonotic emerging disease in the Yunnan Province

Questionnaire; and Biological sampling of blood and mile from animals/humans.

Brucellosis remains uncommon.

There is low awareness of the diseases.

In 2008, the Research Institute for Humanity and Nature (RIHN) launched Ecohealth projects in SEA to examine the relationship between endemic infectious diseases, ecosystem and societal transformation. In Lao PDR, the RIHN engaged multiple partners to conduct studies on liver fluke and malaria infection in the Savannakhet Province [29]. Small liver fluke infection was studied in the lowland area in relation to the development of wet rice fields and irrigation systems. Study results from this project show that deforestation has led to the expansion of wet rice fields and irrigation and an increase of population density, thus increasing the population at risk of Opisthorchis viverrini infection [29]. In the mountainous area, a trans-border study of the Laos-Vietnam border was conducted to examine malaria in relation to forest degradation. These results found a large difference in malaria incidence. This project established two Health and Demographic Surveillance Systems (HDSSs) and one mobile phone network in the province, both which continue to produce Ecohealth data [29].

The ’Lawa Model: Integrated Opisthorchiasis Control in Northeast Thailand’ is an ongoing effort initiated in 2008 by the Tropical Disease Research Laboratory, a unit affiliated with the Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University (KKU-TDR), Thailand. The KKU-TDR’s focus has been village-based cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) and O. viverrini screening of volunteer community members, provision of antihelminth medication at no cost and education focused on discouraging consumption of uncooked fish. Sripa et al. (2015) provide information on the history of the control efforts in Thailand and the Lawa project [30].

The Lawa Model represents a significant elaboration of the Thai government’s top-down nationwide liver fluke campaigns conducted since the 1980s that failed to impact much of the Northeast. Concentrating on ten villages near Lawa Lake in the Khon Kaen Province, KKU-TDR’s programme has apparently resulted in significant reductions in prevalence, locally. The recognition of a general association of O. viverrini infection prevalence and CCA incidence with populations whose livelihoods are tied to reservoir-wetland ecosystem complexes represented an important research contribution [31].

Particularly in light of this, associating with EcoEID in 2011 and incorporating elements of the Ecohealth approach offered the opportunity to develop the Lawa Project as a model for opisthorchiasis control in the lower Mekong Basin. Significant challenges in developing an integrated control strategy include overcoming gaps in the scientific understanding of O. viverrini transmission and its contribution to disease. Details of the transmission dynamics of Opisthorchis spp., particularly regarding ecology and social ecology, remain largely unknown. The same is true for the health risk of the O. viverrini infection that raw fish consumption actually poses in terms of CCA, as other dietary factors as well as genetic polymorphisms may be more important (see [32] and references cited therein). The KKU-TDR, among other research groups, has recently initiated research to address these gaps.

Ecohealth and agricultural intensification, and environment and climate change

Southeast Asia is experiencing rapid agricultural and livestock intensification, which is having a profound impact on ecosystems and human health [13]. Intensive use of chemical fertilisers, pesticides and irrigation technology, in combination with high-yielding crop varieties is placing intense pressures on the environment and its natural resources [33, 34].

An early Ecohealth project that had great influence in SEA was the ’Land Use Change and Human Health in the Eastern Himalayas’, initiated in 2006. Supported by the IDRC, the International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD) conducted action-based research to understand the links between land use change and human health in the eastern Himalayas. The overall objective of the project was to reduce the vulnerability of mountain people to human health issues caused by land use change. The research was conducted in three field study sites in Nepal, the Yunnan Province and the Tibetan Autonomous Region of China, each with a number of research objectives, questions and hypotheses. Specifically in the Yunnan Province, the focus of the project was on water improvement and pesticide management in the context of agricultural intensification. The multi-disciplinary team used several methods to collect data in four villages across three townships. The results of the study showed that commercial vegetable farming strains limit water resources and bring new challenges to the local management regimes. Intensified vegetable cultivation has led to inadequate water supplies from the river, creating tensions over water allocation. An additional stress on the water is the pollution caused by chemical fertilisers, pesticides and domestic waste. Many water sources lack basic structural protection, increasing the risk of contamination. The study concluded that water shortages would continue to worsen with the expansion of vegetable cultivation [35].

The National Centre of Competence in Research North–south (NCCR North–South) is a Swiss research programme that focused on global change and its impact on sustainable development. Launched as a 12-year program in 2001, the NCCR aimed to build research capacity and partnerships between nine institutions throughout Asia, Africa, Latin America and Switzerland. In SEA, the NCCR North–South research focused on the health impacts of environmental sanitation. An Ecohealth research programme was implemented from 2007 to 2012 in the Hanam Province, Vietnam to comprehensively assess the impact of combined human and animal sanitation [36]. Hanam, a peri-urban study site, offered a good setting to study a system combining human and animal sanitation, as in this area human excreta and animal manure are used together with wastewater in agriculture and aquaculture [37]. Most households (85%) engage in agricultural activities; they are predominantly smallholders and often raise 2–20 pigs on land that is simultaneously residential, agricultural, aquacultural and horticultural. The use of waste raised issues for environmental sanitation, agriculture, and health and well-being. Three components of the framework were implemented, namely environmental, health and socio-economic assessments, leading to the identification of critical control points with an important emphasis on participation of the community [38].

The Field Building Leadership Initiative in Southeast Asia (FBLI), a five-year (2012–2017) regional programme, is working to address ecosystem and health issues related to agricultural intensification [39]. Implemented by seven institutions and universities in Thailand, Indonesia, Vietnam and China, the initiative uses a diverse range of methods and activities, including the ’site-based research concept’ in Yuanmou (Kunming, China), Hanam (Vietnam), Chachoengsao (Thailand), and Pangalengan and West Java (Indonesia). Research is the backbone of the initiative and serves as a platform for future growth in the field. While each project site focuses on a research topic related to individual country priorities, the ultimate impact is seen through more sustainable agricultural practices and livelihoods. The long-term vision of the programme is to develop a well-established field of Ecohealth that is sustainable, institutionalised, and influential in driving environmental and health policy [40]. Although the FBLI is still at an early stage to harvest research findings, Table 4 provides a summary of the key findings from country-specific situational analysis, stakeholder workshops, Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA) and preliminary surveys.
Table 4

Summary of early findings from country-specific FBLI projects

Yuanmou Country, Yuanmou Province

Pangalengan, Bandung District, West Java Province

Chachoengsao Province

Hanam Province

Entry points

Controlling pesticide use; and Promoting better water management practices.

Dairy production; Connecting issues; and Finding interventions for small-scale farming.

Proposed best practices among communities associated with rubber plantations to reduce their risk of vector-borne diseases.

Livestock and human waste recycling for agriculture; and Impact on human and environmental health.

Research methods

In-depth interviews; Household questionnaire survey; Laboratory test of pesticide residues of vegetable and fruit samples; and Data analysis.

Literature search; Pre-survey questionnaire; In-depth interviews and FGDs; and Data analysis.

Situation analysis; Specific field site visits; and Preliminary survey and questionnaire.

Qualitative scoping/interviews; Participatory stakeholder workshop.

Secondary data collection; Samples collected; Data was compiled and initial analysis.

Findings (early results as of January 2014)

Two types of farmers in Yuanmou: local farmers and farmers who work on farms and plantations as daily wage labourers.

Nearly all farmers in the groups owned their land, farm and cows.

Malaria, dengue and chikungunya are an issue in the province; 60% of malaria reported was found in labourers, possibly working in the rubber plantation.

The number of households with livestock decreased but the number of livestock heads (pigs) increased; Common method to manage animal waste is biogas; Community has concerns with pesticide use in cropping and manage package after use; and Communes do not have landfill or treatment sites.

Results from pretesting reveal that around 10% of the samples tested positive for pesticides.

Main problems are low-quality concentrates, a lack of grass and other foodstuffs and poor management of small farms.

Poor productivity and quality of the milk mean farmers must accept very low prices for their milk.

Some farmers may dilute their milk before sending it to collection stations.

Network development, capacity building and training

The projects explored in this paper aim to build capacity of researchers and institutions in order to effectively promote and scale up the Ecohealth approach. Through numerous workshops and exchanges, the national research teams of the APEIR have been able to jointly design, plan and implement their projects and have been recognised for their role in regional collaboration [17]. The EcoZD project met its main objective of increasing the capacity of researchers and implementers to use an Ecohealth approach for better control of zoonoses, proven through outcome mapping (OM)a and Ecohealth uptake assessment [26]. The project exceeded its goals by developing two Ecohealth Resource Centres (EHRCs) that introduced manuals, short courses and training for students and practitioners. Another EHRC has been developed at the Hanoi School of Public Health from a post-doctoral research that focused on interdisciplinary projects [41]. From the onset of the FBLI, the programme aimed for comprehensive capacity building. Activities included the development of an Ecohealth Trainer Manual, training of Ecohealth trainers, training a generation of future Ecohealth leaders (True Leaders Program) and introducing graduate degree training programmes at the MSc and PhD level in Ecohealth, One Health and Ecosystem Management [42].

Contributions from different Ecohealth projects in the region have stimulated Ecohealth teaching at universities in SEA and East Asia. Mainly these take the form of short courses or certificate training and integrating Ecohealth into existing curricula. Table 5 summarises Ecohealth courses taught in universities in the region. The courses have attracted hundreds of students each year, but as graduate and post-graduate courses are relatively new, there little information on the demand for ’Ecohealth’ or ’One Health’ graduates.
Table 5

Ecohealth courses taught in universities in the region

Host institution

Countries and partners involved

Ecohealth degree trainings:

Mahidol University (pending)

Thailand, Vietnam, Indonesia, China, Laos, Malaysia

• MSc in One Health and Ecosystem Management

CMU (with UMN)

• MSc in Global Health

Ecohealth short courses:

Thailand, Vietnam, Indonesia, China, Malaysia

• Concept of Ecohealth

• Ecohealth and risk assessment

• Ecohealth and food safety

• Global Health True Leader

• Emerging Zoonotic Diseases (EZDs)

Integrated Ecohealth in existing modules:

HSPH, KMU, UI, Mahidol

Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, Indonesia, China

• Environmental Health

• Epidemiology

• Food safety and nutrition

CMU: Chiang Mai University, Thailand.

UGM: Gadjah Mada University, Indonesia.

UI: Universitas Indonesia, Indonesia.

KMU: Kunming Medical University.

HSPH: Hanoi School of Public Health.

ILRI: International Livestock Research Institute.

VSF: Veterinarians Without Borders, Canada.

Other fora and symposia in the region of SEA have contributed to the networking and development of new ideas for promoting Ecohealth. For example, several special sessions or side events were organised at the Prince Mahidol Award Conference (PMAC) in Bangkok in 2013 and 2014. Other Ecohealth symposia were organised in Hue, Vietnam and Beijing (China) in collaboration with the RIHN at the 4th Asia Pacific Conference on Public Health ’Climate Change and Population Health’. The first regional Ecohealth of Asia Pacific’s by Veterinary Public Health Centre for Asia Pacific (VPHCAP) conference was held in Chiang Mai in 2011 [43]. In October 2012, the fourth biennial conference of the International Association for Ecology and Health was held in Kunming, China. This meeting had large group discussions about the emerging field of Ecohealth and how best to create a sustainable environment for Ecohealth-type research. The diversity of conference attendees allowed for an in-depth analysis of the field and showed the need for connections between groups and enabling structures that support conversations and collaborations between groups [44].

Building Capacity for Ecohealth Research and Practice in Asia (BECA) is a research project that investigates the processes involved in building capacity for research and application of ecosystem approaches. Through workshops, training events and resource development, BECA aims to develop the capacity to reduce the risk of outbreaks of EIDs in Cambodia, China, Indonesia, Lao PDR, Thailand and Vietnam [45]. BECA also developed the capacity of partners to write policy briefs from research evidence for informed policy.

Paradigm shift: from proactive support of donors to competitive process for funding

As mentioned above, although some Ecohealth projects in SEA have been financially supported by AusAID, the WHO and the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC), major Ecohealth projects on EIDs and ZEIDs have primarily been funded by the IDRC. The sustainability is questionable; for example, when Ecohealth does not exist as a programme at the IDRC, the question arises as to how Ecohealth research will be supported by other donors besides the IDRC. A pragmatic response by partners has been to brand themselves as both Ecohealth and One Health (e.g. the Chiang Mai resource centres), signalling to a broader range of donors.

The process of IDRC grant making is to guide, in a participatory fashion, the potential grant recipients (selected on the basis of pre-proposals) to develop an acceptable final proposal, upon which the project’s funds are released. For many of the other donors, the topic of projects is set by the funder, which leaves little room for partners to identify locally relevant topics that fit local needs. For example, the topic of EIDs is internationally important, however, it might not be among the top priorities of some countries and regions from the perspective of burden of diseases and social impacts. Interestingly, an assessment by the EcoZD project found that many local partners accepted the priorities of the international community (e.g. avian influenza), while simultaneously stated that other priorities (e.g. food-borne diseases) were of far greater importance to the communities they served.

More recently a shift has been observed towards a more competitive basis and grantees have more liberty to identify relevant research topics. The EcoEID programme had two rounds of calls for concept notes and full proposals, and the partners identified the research questions from their perspective, while staying within the topic of infectious diseases. In this case, the IDRC had a smaller role in proposal development. Three major EcoEID projects were selected [46]. Another initiative of Ecohealth, the FBLI project, was able to mobilise a regional consortium to develop a non-infectious focused research – training – intervention programme on agricultural intensification [40]. In this FBLI development, the IDRC also collaboratively partners through a proposal development process of different stages, but it is the partners of the consortium who mainly identified the main research and training topics. It was probably due to this proactive role of the consortium that the initiative did not address infectious diseases but rather animal waste management, dairy and food safety, pesticide use, and rubber plantation and health [42]. It is interesting to see this shift in funding modalities and the way researchers in Ecohealth become more proactive in proposing their ideas to donors. This can be seen as an indicator of the sustainability of Ecohealth ’in practice’ in the region, as Ecohealth is applied to issues locally identified by partners.

Conclusion main challenges and the way forward for ecohealth in sea

Ecohealth and the closely related One Health, both of which can be characterised as integrative approaches to health, have proved to be highly attractive concepts that easily win approval from a wide range of stakeholders. Integrative health approaches are endorsed by the ’three sisters’ (the WHO, the FAO and the OIE) viewed as the three global standard setters for health, zoonoses and food-borne diseases. Important publications have gathered evidence that integrative health research is more effective and accessible than sectoral approaches, and a broad range of journals and conferences disseminate research on Ecohealth and One Health. Globally, there is a need to develop an understanding of the dependence of health on ecosystems, as well as a need to widen Ecohealth approaches to address the interconnected and up-stream drivers of health and well-being: environmental, social and economic factors [47].

These imperatives for more integrative health approaches notwithstanding, the great majority of medical education, clinical practice, ancillary services, development programmes and research continue to operate within disciplinary boundaries. Grace et al. (2011) identified ’barriers and bridges’ in this regard in relation to Ecohealth in SEA [48]. Among the barriers were: many of the Ecohealth successes have been ’boutique projects’ which did not demonstrate impact at scale; enthusiasm for Ecohealth has been highest among veterinarians, environmentalists and medical sociologists who are the most marginalised in the arena of human health; although the epidemiologic rational for Ecohealth is well demonstrated, economic and policy aspects have received less attention; cultural attitudes can promote hierarchies and gate-keeping of knowledge rather than more egalitarian and open approaches typified by Ecohealth; and concerns that Ecohealth is one of a large number of new paradigms that originate outside SEA.

In spite of these barriers, overall success of Ecohealth in SEA is demonstrated by the scope and scale of activities collectively encompassed by the projects, programmes and initiatives reviewed here. Ecohealth has been both widely accepted and gained a remarkable amount of exposure in SEA in a relatively short time. Still, limited human and financial resources, as well as a lack of capacity and coordination to develop Ecohealth research, are obstacles to scaling up the Ecohealth approach. Overall, achieving policy influence remains a constraint to the success of the Ecohealth approach [47].

The Ecohealth approach presents new challenges and opportunities for researchers, community-groups and policy makers. While Ecohealth is an innovative approach that is aligned with the latest thinking in global health and international development, the field faces several barriers to implementing sustainable change [3]. The question that remains is whether the interest and activity will continue without funding explicitly directed toward Ecohealth, One Health or similar approaches in the absence of a relevant level of funding during the past decade. The answer may lie in how well these concepts have been understood, integrated within or have been adapted to be complementary to previously existing missions, programmes or agendas of the above institutions and organisations.

However, much remains to be done before Ecohealth can be considered reasonably operational or institutionalised. The measurement of its progress in this regard, as well of outputs in terms increased human resource capacity in the form of knowledge and skills required to implement Ecohealth approaches based on Ecohealth tenets is beyond the scope of this paper. This is essential to generating evidence for the sustainable benefits of Ecohealth. The project descriptions provided here, which are based largely on information self-produced and thus inevitably subjective to some degree, can only provide glimpses of this. Clearly, projects varied in the degree to which their components, design or methods were consistent with a transdisciplinarity approach. Thus it has not been possible to objectively assess from our survey how well these ideas are understood conceptually, and especially whether this understanding is sufficiently comprehensive to serve as a solid foundation for continued development. More information on each project, along with specific evaluation criteria is required to truly gauge their impact, such as that provided by Wilcox et al. [49], who offer a list of seven components of a successful Ecohealth project.

In addition to such evidence, promoting Ecohealth approaches requires an understanding of how major shifts in health policy and practice occur, as well as how the ability to influence opinion and policy shifts. Many models exist for both understanding and influencing policy change and most of these involve, either implicitly or explicitly, a ’theory of change’. These models recognise that evidence is only one part of policy influence and that positive influence of policy is highly dependent on context.

A rather low scientific productivity in terms of publications has been seen after the Ecohealth projects finished. However, it is common for 3–4-year-long research projects to produce most publications 5–8 years after project completion so it is too early to evaluate this aspect. There is some evidence that the network and capacity developed from Ecohealth projects helped acquire new projects, as is the case of phase 2 of the APEIR. The latter now has two new projects on wildlife and antimicrobial resistance that are still fully funded by the IDRC. The translational aspect of these projects looks limited except for the steering committee of the APEIR composed by senior members in member countries. Nevertheless, Ecohealth is not at the level where it is accepted widely as a valid approach to research and intervention.

Finally, capacity building in Ecohealth at different levels, namely from individual to institutional levels, is needed in the region and sensitising policy makers on Ecohealth so that this approach could be happen at a larger scale in research, teaching and intervention. It is known that there is lots of thinking and discussion on Ecohealth and One Health, however, more concrete case studies using Ecohealth and showing added value of this approach are urgently needed. This is also the way to bridge the gap between research and practice in Ecohealth.

aOutcome mapping (OM) is a methodology for planning and assessing development programming that is oriented towards change and social transformation. OM provides a set of tools to design and gather information on the outcomes, defined as behavioural changes, of the change process (

The authors thank the regional core group members of the programme ’Field Building Leadership Initiative in Southeast Asia’ (FBLI:; and Ms Nguyen Bich Thao, Dr Jeff Gilbert and Dr Fred Unger for their contribution to this paper. HNV and DXT have been supported by the IDRC through the FBLI programme. SD was supported by a research grant from Simon Fraser University for an internship at the HSPH CENPHER.

Authors’ Affiliations

International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), Hanoi, Vietnam
Centre for Public Health and Ecosystem Research (CENPHER), Hanoi School of Public Health (HSPH), Hanoi, Vietnam
Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute (Swiss TPH), Basel, Switzerland
University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
National Institute and Animal Sciences, Hanoi, Vietnam
Research Institute for Humanity and Nature (RIHN), Kyoto, Japan
Integrative Education and Research Programme, Faculty of Public Health, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Health, Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine, Tufts University, North Grafton, USA
International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), Nairobi, Kenya

  1. Charron DF: Ecosystem approaches to health for a global sustainability agenda.Ecohealth 2012, 9:256–66. 10.1007/s10393-012-0791-5View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Zinsstag J: Convergence of ecohealth and one health.EcoHealth 2012, 9:371–3. 10.1007/s10393-013-0812-zView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Charron DF: Ecohealth research in practice innovative applications of an ecosystem approach to health. Ottawa: Springer; 2012.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Henry A, Ellis B, Kapan D, Krend K, Bennett S, Wilcox BA: Technical notes and exercises for ecosystem characterization with reference to aedes vectors of dengue: developed for the First Community of Practice (COP) workshop for research teams participating in the TDR/IDRC reseach initiative on eco-bio-social research in Asia. Bangkok: Center for Vectors and Vector Borne Diseases, Faculty of Public Health, Mahidol University; 2006.Google Scholar
  5. Kaneshiro KY, Chinn P, Duin KN, Hood AP, Maly K, Wilcox BA: Hawai’i’s mountain-to-sea ecosystems: social-ecological microcosms for sustainability science and practice.EcoHealth Ecohealth 2005, 2:349–60. 10.1007/s10393-005-8779-zView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Spiegel J, Bennett S, Hattersley L, Hayden MH, Kittayapong P, Nalim S, et al.: Barriers and bridges to prevention and control of dengue: the need for a social–ecological approach.Ecohealth 2005, 2:273–90. 10.1007/s10393-005-8388-xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Wilcox B, Colwell RR: Emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases: biocomplexity as an interdisciplinary paradigm.Ecohealth 2005, 2:244–57. 10.1007/s10393-005-8961-3View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Koyadun S, Butraporn P, Kittayapong P: Ecologic and sociodemographic risk determinants for dengue transmission in urban areas in Thailand.Interdiscip Perspect Infect Dis 2012, 2012:907494.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Thongsripong P, Green A, Kittayapong P, Kapan D, Wilcox B, Bennett S: Mosquito vector diversity across habitats in central Thailand endemic for dengue and other arthropod-borne diseases.PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2013, 7:e2507. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002507View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Finucane ML, Fox J, Saksena S, Spencer J: A conceptual framework for analyzing social-ecological models of emerging infectious diseases. In Book a conceptual framework for analyzing social-ecological models of emerging infectious diseases. Springer Netherlands: Springer; 2014:93–109.Google Scholar
  11. Tran CC, Yost RS, Yanagida JF, Saksena S, Fox J, Sultana N: Spatio-temporal occurrence modeling of highly pathogenic avian influenza subtype H5N1: a case study in the Red River Delta, Vietnam.ISPRS Int J Geo-Inf 2013, 2:1106–21. 10.3390/ijgi2041106View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Grace D, Gilbert J, Lapar ML, Unger F, Fevre S, Nguyen-Viet H, et al.: Zoonotic emerging infectious disease in selected countries in Southeast Asia: insights from ecohealth.Ecohealth 2011, 8:55–62. 10.1007/s10393-010-0357-3View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Coker RJ, Hunter BM, Rudge JW, Liverani M, Hanvoravongchai P: Emerging infectious diseases in Southeast Asia: regional challenges to control.Lancet 2011, 377:599–609. 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62004-1View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Colwell RR, Wilcox BA: Water, ecology, and health.Ecohealth 2010, 7:151–2. 10.1007/s10393-010-0339-5View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Wilcox BA, Gubler DJ: Disease ecology and the global emergence of zoonotic pathogens.Environ Health Preventive Med 2005, 10:263–72. 10.1007/BF02897701View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Wilder-Smith A: Baseline research to policy assessment for emerging infectious diseases in the asia-pacific region: research report. 2009.Google Scholar
  17. Silkavute P, Tung DX, Jongudomsuk P: Sustaining a regional emerging infectious disease research network: a trust-based approach.Emerg Health Threats J 2013, 6:19957. Scholar
  18. APEIR. []
  19. APEIR: Avian influenza: impacts and key policy messages for Asia.Book avian influenza: impacts and key policy messages for Asia 2013.Google Scholar
  20. Liu D, Shi W, Shi Y, Wang D, Xiao H, Li W, et al.: Origin and diversity of novel avian influenza A H7N9 viruses causing human infection: phylogenetic, structural, and coalescent analyses.Lancet 2013, 381:1926–32. 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60938-1View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Pongcharoensuk P, Adisasmito W, Sat LM, Silkavute P, Muchlisoh L, Cong Hoat P, et al.: Avian and pandemic human influenza policy in South-East Asia: the interface between economic and public health imperatives.Health Policy Plann 2011, 27:374–83.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Sommerfeld J, Kroeger A: Eco-bio-social research on dengue in Asia: a multicountry study on ecosystem and community-based approaches for the control of dengue vectors in urban and peri-urban Asia.Pathog Glob Health 2012, 106:428–35. 10.1179/2047773212Y.0000000055View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. WHO-TDR/IDRC: Multi-country study on “Eco-Bio-Social Research on Dengue in Asia” core elements for further proposal development (For Phase 1): version December 21, 2006. UNICEF/UNDP/World Bank/WHO Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (TDR) in collaboration with International Development Research Centre (IDRC). Workshop report. 2006.Google Scholar
  24. Canada-Australia research partnership for the prevention of emerging diseases.
  25. Kittayapong P: Application of an eco-bio-social approach to emerging infectious diseases in Southeast Asian global outreach hot spots. In Book application of an eco-bio-social approach to emerging infectious diseases in Southeast Asian global outreach hot spots. Bangkok: EcoEID Project Proposal; 2010.Google Scholar
  26. Gilbert J, Grace D, Unger F, Lapar L, Assé R, Tohtubtiang K, et al.: Outcomes in building capacity and strengthening networks: ecohealth in Southeast Asia.ILRI research brief 2014, 12:1–4.Google Scholar
  27. International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI).
  28. Gilbert J, Unger F, Mehta P, Lapar L, Assé R, Tohtubtiang K, et al.: Ecosystem approaches to the better management of zoonotic emerging infectious diseases in the Southeast Asia Region. Sixth and Final Technical Report Covering the period 22nd February 2008 to 22nd August 2013. The International Livestock Research Institute. Final research project report to IDRC. 2013.Google Scholar
  29. Kazuhiko M: Environmental change and infectious disease in tropical Asia. Research Institute for Humanity and Nature; 2014. Scholar
  30. Sripa B, Tangkawattana S, Laha T, Kaewkes S, Mallory FF, Smith JF, et al.: Toward integrated opisthorchiasis control in Northeast Thailand: the Lawa project.Acta Trop 2015,141(Pt B):361–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Sithithaworn P, Andrews RH, Nguyen VD, Wongsaroj T, Sinuon M, Odermatt P, et al.: The current status of opisthorchiasis and clonorchiasis in the Mekong Basin.Parasitol Int 2012, 61:10–6. 10.1016/j.parint.2011.08.014View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Songserm N, Promthet S, Sithithaworn P, Pientong C, Ekalaksananan T, Chopjitt P, et al.: MTHFR polymorphisms and Opisthorchis viverrini infection: a relationship with increased susceptibility to cholangiocarcinoma in Thailand.Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2011, 12:1341–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Sujan Piya AK, Hironori Y: Sources of agricultural productivity growth in South and Southeast Asia.Trends Agri Econ 2011, 4:18–29.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Matson PA, Parton WJ, Power AG, Swift MJ: Agricultural intensification and ecosystem properties.Science 1997, 277:504–9. 10.1126/science.277.5325.504View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Fang J, Wu X, Xu J, Yang X, Song X, Wang G, et al.: Water management challenges in the context of agricultural intensification and endemic fluorosis: the case of Yuanmou County.Ecohealth 2012, 8:444–55.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Nguyen-Viet H, Zinsstag J, Schertenleib R, Zurbrugg C, Obrist B, Montangero A, et al.: Improving environmental sanitation, health, and well-being: a conceptual framework for integral interventions.EcoHealth 2009, 6:180–91. 10.1007/s10393-009-0249-6View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Nga DT, Morel A, Hung NV, Phuc PD, Nishida K, Kootattep T: Assessing nutrient fluxes in a Vietnamese rural area despite limited and highly uncertain data.Resour Conserv Recycling 2011, 55:849–56. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.04.008View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Nguyen-Viet H, Pham-Duc P, Nguyen V, Tanner M, Odermatt P, Vu-Van T, et al.: A one health perspective for integrated human and animal sanitation and nutrient recycling. In One health: the theory and practice of integrated health approaches. Edited by: Zinsstag J, Schelling E, Whittaker M, Tanner M. London: CABI; In pressGoogle Scholar
  39. Edi Basuno KB, Crocetti EM, Fèvre S, Horwitz P, Nguyen Thanh Huong JF, Maskhao P, et al.: Ecohealth trainer manual.Book ecohealth trainer manual 2013.Google Scholar
  40. Nguyen-Viet H, Pham G, Tung DX: Field building leadership initiative: advancing ecohealth in Southeast Asia - the first year journey. 10th Year Anniversary of Veterinary Public Health Centre for Asia Pacific. Veterinary Public Health Centre for Asia Pacific (VPHCAP), Chiang Mai University: 192–197. Conferecne proceedings. 2013.Google Scholar
  41. CENPHER: CENPHER five year report 2009–2014: from a research project to a research center. Center for Public health and ecosystem research at Hanoi School of Public Health. Hanoi: Information Publishing House; 2014.Google Scholar
  42. FBLI: Field building leadership initiative: advancing ecohealth in Southeast Asia. 2014. http://www.ecohealthasia.netGoogle Scholar
  43. VPHCAP: The 1st Regional EcoHealth (EH) symposium: social and environment dynamics on human and animal health. Chiangmai, Thailand: VPHCAP, Chiangmai University; 2011.Google Scholar
  44. Saint-Charles J, Webb J, Sanchez A, Mallee H, Van Wendelde Joo de B, Nguyen-Viet H: Ecohealth as a field: looking forward.Ecohealth 2014.Google Scholar
  45. Hall DC: Building Capacity for Ecohealth Research and Practice in Asia (BECA). In Book building capacity for ecohealth research and practice in Asia. Ottawa: Veterinarians Without Borders/Vétérinaires sans Frontières-Canada; 2012.Google Scholar
  46. Ecohealth Emerging Infectious Diseases Research Initiative (EcoEID).
  47. Grace D: The business case for One Health.Onderstepoort J Vet Res 2014, 8:6.Google Scholar
  48. Grace D, Kabayo W, McDermott J: Institutional arrangements for implementing one health and eco-health bridges and barriers. Melbourse Australia: First International One health conference; 2011.Google Scholar
  49. Wilcox B, Aguirre AA, Horwitz P: Ecohealth: connecting ecology, health, and sustainability. In Book ecohealth: connecting ecology, health, and sustainability. New York: Oxford University Press; 2012.Google Scholar

© Nguyen-Viet et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.


WARC-Identified-Payload-Type: application/xhtml+xml

text:
Tuesday, 3 May 2011

Katie’s Magic Teapot & the Cosmic Pandas Educational Book

Looking for the ideal picture book for a young child can be a minefield, as the sender is unsure of the tot’s preferences, learning stages or crazes of the moment. A totally different kind of tots’ picture book could be the answer, my children’s picture book, Katie’s Magic Teapot & the Cosmic Pandas.

Book Gift Idea for Young Girls
This illustrated children’s book in oils is designed to provide lots of visual stimulation for young explorers who wish to learn more about our cosmos, and what more bizarre way of doing so, than within a flying teapot?

This learning book is aimed primarily for young girls ages between 3 and 7 years of age.

The idea for the story came to me via the imagery first. I wanted to create images that will compel young eyes, as I would have liked a picture book to have done so for me as a youngster. I enjoyed experimenting with different compositions, particularly the double paged painting featuring a time-lapse travel through space, which shows eight teapots. Screenshots on this page serve to give an idea of the look of the book.

Learning Book about the Cosmos for Kids

Preview of Children's Learning Book
The picture book informs on the planets within our solar system as well as objects deeper into space such as galaxies and nebulae. Katie also encounters pandas along the way, the colour of each being significant to the surroundings. As the teapot embarks its journey, Katie spots a green panda in the village green, a blue panda up in the blue, a yellow panda nearer the sun and so forth.

The pandas scoop up space dust during the journey, of which Katie conjects is for cosmic tea, but which the reasons become clear in the story’s climax.

E Books for Kids

Illustration for Katie's Magic Teapot
The book’s dimensions are 8x10in, 32 pages long and with approximately 1000 words, which makes it an ideal book for 3 – 7 year olds. The book is available on kindle as well as print copy version on Amazon. I wrote a sequel to the story, entitled, Katie and the Cosmic Pandas’ Deep Sea Voyage, which charts Katie’s journey under the oceans.

I have written a children’s book for boys entitled Ben’s Little Big Adventure. Details can be found on this blog or on Amazon.

Link to Giftsites

Ideas for gift site
Gift ideas for kids


WARC-Truncated: length

text:
PostHuman Derive

The technological singularity is imminent. We are approaching a point in time where evolution will result in another paradigm shift.

Architecture can be seen as movement through space, the journey of getting from point A to point B with the moving body reacting to obstacles and barriers in a constant dialogue constructing the overall experience. PostHuman derive is a design vision taking into account how technology changed our experience of space, from our bodies and abilities to the experience of the city.

The project took form of designing an Exoskeleton for Parkour performers on one scale, and the architecture their enhanced ability produced on the scale of the city which took form of a dynamic bridge across the Thames. Just like ants can form bridges with their bodies attached to one another.

Fundamentally, the relationship between the body and its surroundings is being looked at. Looking at current trends in technological development the thesis projects possibilities for an augmented human body for the parkour community, and suggests how the architectural and urban experience may be rethought where inhabitants of the city actively participate  individually and collectively in the construct of their overall experience.

PostHuman Derive is my Architectural Association Diploma Thesis Project, for more information please download my Thesis Book from the following link – posthuman_derive.

To download my Technical Thesis and Research please click the following link : technical-studies-thesis.

Phase 1 : The Technological Singularity

I put together a compilation of science fiction scenes speculating implications of the singularity,  Combined with voice overs from tech giants, and leaders anticipating the coming of the technological singularity.

Phase 2 : Exploring Embodiment

A group production by AA Diploma 18 (2015/2016) at the Watermill Centre, Long Island. The Diploma 18 Tribe was dancing in the forest, reacting to nature with the body.

Phase 3 : A Scaleless Architecture

Phase 4 : Enhanced Movement

Phase 5 : The PostHuman Anatomy

Phase 6 : Enabled – New Standards?

Phase 7 : The PostHuman Derive

Phase 8 : The PostHuman Derive

Mixed media models : 3D printing, casting, hand made models :

Augmented Reality Installation :


text:
Prime Minister Turnbull tells Queen Elizabeth II he is "Elizabethan" (screen shot via YouTube).

As republican-Elizabethan Malcolm Turnbull gazes at his broad church, Mungo MacCallum reminds him that Menzies was a big "C" Conservative.

JUST ABOUT the last thing Malcolm Turnbull did before leaving Australia last week was to inveigh against his colleagues' navel gazing.

The public was not interested in politicians talking about themselves, the Prime Minister declared.

And having cleared that up, he went off to give a major speech that produced headlines blazoning an agenda apparently designed to bore the public rigid.

Most of it was the usual stuff: fight terrorism, secure borders, more free trade — more freedom generally, as long as we don’t talk about specific policies which might be mildly embarrassing. But in the middle of this jollity, our prime minister detonated a landmine: the Liberal Party of Australia was not a conservative party.

He quickly doubled back on that proclaiming yet again, that the party was a "broad church", but the damage was done. Making this the centrepiece of the speech (as he must have known it would be) was obviously perverse, but the context was frankly bizarre: Turnbull was speaking to accept the Disraeli prize at a gala dinner hosted the British Tory Policy Exchange think tank in London, half a world away.

If he was to issue the sort of ideological challenge he clearly intended, surely it would have been more sensible to do so at home. After all, he had only just addressed the schism-riven New South Wales party conference — an ideal venue for a barney. Admittedly, if he had thrown down the gauntlet in Sydney he would probably have been attacked with chairs from half the delegates, but it would have been a more courageous stance.

As it was, he has been accused of hiding as well as provocation. Perhaps he thought the distance would protect him, but more likely he was relying on the thought of Chairman Menzies, the infallible doctrine could not be gainsaid and Menzies once said that he had deliberately picked the name of Liberal rather than Conservative to keep its platform inclusive — even a touch progressive.

Well, maybe he did, but Menzies said a lot of things and, as Tony Abbott and many others know, the devil may cite scripture for his purpose. In nanoseconds, the airwaves were filled with furious reactionaries from NewsCorp and Foxtel insisting that the great man had been verballed and traduced; their Knight of the Thistle, the Warden of the Cinq Ports had never entertained a progressive thought in his life. Liberal was spelled with a big "L", not a little "l" and if Turnbull didn’t like it they would find a leader who did. Cory Bernardi and Pauline Hanson instantly offered to fill the gap. Turnbull, once again, had revealed himself a traitor to the cause and an apostate against the one true dogma.

Interestingly, almost all of the most vocal critics would not have been born when Menzies retired more than 50 years ago; even those who were would have been unlikely to have had much to do with the man who had cordially despised and avoided the media for most of his long career.

For example, the Liberal Party fawn, Nick Cater, who runs the propaganda unit that bears the founder’s name, had probably never heard of the man until he immigrated from England a couple of decades ago. Nonetheless, the fawn set up his Ouija board to channel the spirit of the leader and declare unequivocally how unhappy he would have been about the current pretender to his legacy. This kind of rewriting history is, of course, both partisan and futile but it is an essential part of the current struggle and will continue until one or both of the contestants collapses in defeat.

The point about Menzies is that he was a man of his times and his times were a long, long time ago. Menzies was a Victorian, in the same way Turnbull now claims to be an Elizabethan. He was born in the 19th Century and remained a creature of it all his life. He was not only an unwavering supporter of White Australia; within that context he was an Anglophile, a monarchist and British – as he once said – to his bootstraps.

He might tolerate other Anglophones in the United States, Canada and, notoriously, South Africa, where he became a supporter of the apartheid regime. But he was uncomfortable with most ethnic groups and would have rejected totally and immediately the idea of the multicultural Australia Turnbull now celebrates. And, as for same sex marriage, the very thought would have been an abomination.

For what it is worth, I am ancient enough to have grown up under Menzies and I even met him a couple of times, and it never occurred to me that he was anything but a big "C" Conservative. Apart from his zealous cold war anti-Communism and economic protectionism, his social attitudes were even behind his own times. He had an instinctive attraction for censorship in every field and resisted the advent of television for as long as he could. When decimal currency was finally introduced, shortly before he left office, he tried to rename the Aussie dollar the Royal — shades of Abbott’s knighting of the Duke of Edinburgh.

Menzies would not have been an enthusiast for Turnbull’s exciting times, for innovation and agility. It was left to his successors – Harold Holt and, more particularly, John Gorton – to attempt to haul his party into the 20th Century. Turnbull is now attempting to move it on to the 21st, but without a great deal of success.

Being an Elizabethan sounds good — the first Elizabethan age has been renowned as a time of stability and success — and indeed it was. But there was a price: it was also a time of brutal repression, where the Catholic terrorist boat people of Spain and France was waiting to invade at any opportunity. The Queen’s chief enforcer, the security supremo whose role Peter Dutton now covets, was a ruthless spymaster named Francis Walshingham, who dealt summary justice brutally and efficiently. There was a joke in continental Europe that English coffins were made shorter than normal because there were few heads left to put into them.

Presumably, Turnbull hopes and expects to move on — perhaps to become a Carolingian. But that name also has some unfortunate connotations. He may do better to stick to Oz, shut up about his dysfunctional party and try and get on with the job, and revert to the real core belief of the Liberals. They and all their right-leaning predecessors within the broad church cleave to the one, single, unswerving ideology: keep Labor out of office.

Forget about conservatives and progressives, go for the fight fans. Some of the public at least might start paying attention.

Mungo MacCallum is a veteran journalist who worked for many years in the Canberra Press Gallery. This article was published on 'Pearls and Irritations' and is republished with permission.

Creative Commons Licence
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Australia License

Monthly Donation

Single Donation

Fearless journalism. Subscribe to IA for just $5.

Share this article:

Join the conversation Comments Policy

comments powered by Disqus

Irenas Bookkeeping Services, Your XERO + MYOB Cloud Accounting Specialist


text:
Contact Us   |   Print Page   |   Sign In   |   Join IPHCA
Community Search
Sign In

CFO Intensive: Recent Developments in CHC Finance

4/30/2018 » 5/1/2018
Annual Conference 2018 - Creating Healthy Communities

IPHCA Programs
Share |

IPHCA's programming is diverse, specialized, and can be tailored to meet the unique needs of its members.

Offerings include Technical Assistance (TA), Education and Training, Quality Improvement Technologies, Outreach and Enrollment, Community Development, Shortage Designations, National Health Service Corp, Bioterrorism and Emergency Preparedness assistance and much more.


text:
In March 2012, we moved to a new address.

25 03 2012

We are chuffed to announce the launch of our new website at a spanking new address www.indianmemoryproject.com and a new category called ‘Letters’!

Two years ago, this project was founded on Facebook, it graduated on to a free WordPress blog, received 1.5 lakh visitors from all over the planet and got featured in publications world over.

And now in 2012, because of some incredible support and patronage, we have a new address and extra space, that can accommodate and display a lot more than before. I do hope you enjoy the website and the project, as much as I enjoy working on it.

Needless to say, this project would have remained a mere idea, had so many people and you not been generous enough to contribute personal images and stories from families. It is these stories, that are vital clues to this big baffling mystery called India. They challenge presumed notions about the subcontinent. I am grateful for every single image and story that has been discovered, and the people I have interacted with because of it.

In other news, the project is now also on the lookout for notable and interesting, personal and not so personal handwritten/typewritten letters (including postcards). Thus, if you happen to have one you would like to share, we’d really like to see and show it. However, the project only accepts Photographs and Letters from before the Year 1991.

I intend to keep the archive free, and so I welcome patronage like gods should be. If you are interested in becoming a financial patron, please do write in at indianmemoryproject@gmail.com.

Until then I shall pin my eye to look for more images, letters and stories. Make the project even bigger and even better. I also look forward to many more submissions from you, your families and your friends. Please do share the site with them. I guarantee they will love it. The more visits and stories we have, the more merry the project becomes.

Thank you for your appreciation,
Warm Regards
Anusha Yadav


text:
Great Lakes Hand Dyed

Name: Elizabeth Deremiah
Business name: Great Lakes Hand Dyed
Website(s): Great Lakes Hand Dyed Shop
What kind of items do you make?
Kettle dyed, variegated, self striping and color shifting yarns.

How long have you been in indie artist?
Since February 2012

What got you interested in your art of choice?
I love to knit and crochet. There was a point in my knitting and crocheting career that left me wanting more. I had read a few tutorials on dyeing yarn and decided to try it out on my own. I found it relaxing and another way to express myself as a creative individual. I love creating and sharing my yarns with others and hearing their glee when they receive squishy packages in the mail from me.
What do you most enjoy about what you do?
Other than the actual process of dyeing, my favorite part of being a yarn dyer is interacting with customers who are excited about my yarns and seeing what they make with it. I’m very guilty of looking through project knit with my yarn on Ravelry and squealing with glee.

What most inspires you?
My everyday life is my biggest inspiration. My life is full of geekery like Harry Potter, video games like Elder Scrolls and Final Fantasy. Also, funny situations that sound like great colorways often make their way into my shop.
What makes your creations unique?
I love experimenting with new processes of yarn dyeing. I’m always trying new techniques and seeing how knitters and crocheters like them. My shop is always full of new and interesting yarns.

Do you have a favorite item or colorway?
My current favorite is overdyeing yarns. I currently have a colorway that was inspired by new hair called Vibrato. It’s base is black, then overdyed sapphire blue and then overdyed purple. It is dyed on my favorite base which has merino, silk, nylon and metallic fibers.

What is something you strive to offer the fiber arts community?
Something new and interesting to look for constantly. I hope to inspire people to check back in the shop every once in a while to see what I’m up to.
Does being an indie fiber artist affect other aspects of your life?
People at my day job are always asking me what I’m knitting or dyeing. I have provided education to a lot of “muggles” (non knitting folk) about properties of wool and the process of dyeing. So there are some well educated muggles out there!

What is your fiber arts superpower?
Turning a ruined skein of yarn into something incredible. I have said “oh shoot” so many times. Often, they’re my favorite skeins!

How is the fiber arts world different for you today than it was five years ago?
5 years ago, I was pretty young and still in high school. My fiber world was my mom’s crochet books and box store yarn. Now that I’ve seen and experience the wonderful people in the fiber arts world, I can’t imagine a life without it.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


text:
2 years ago (2015-11-20 17:41:13)

5% Discount on Lava Pixel V1 at poorvika!!!

0 0
Use coupon code WS5OFF to get 5% Discount and great Prepaid Offers on Lava Pixel V1 at poorvikamobile.com
Visit: http://goo.gl/CqoTH5

Reach us at: 044 43 666 688.
Sign up or Sign in for free.
And start a new thread.
No Threads
More notes by Poorvika


text:
A Monte-Carlo approach for tracking mobile personnel

In this paper, we propose a Monte-Carlo method based on the particle filter framework to track footfall locations generated by mobile personnel using seismic arrays. While the particle proposal function follows a simple bootstrap approach, the novelty in our algorithm comes from a unique weighting strategy that takes into account the sparse nature of the seismic footfall signal and is robust against missed detections and clutter which could appear in the form of other impulsive sources or other walkers. Our weighting strategy automatically makes use of the wavefront shape, either planar or circular, and assigns weights in x-y space. Data association is built into the system, eliminating the need to explicitly associate the received footfall impulses with different walkers. Hence our algorithm is ideal for tracking multiple mobile personnel. We also demonstrate the fusion of our system with range information available by means of radar. Fusion with radar improves x-y tracking when range resolution is lost due to a large distance between the target and the seismic array leading to planar wavefronts.

Presented at:
IEEE Aerospace Conference, Big Sky, MT, Mar 03-10, 2007

 Record created 2010-09-07, last modified 2018-01-28

External link:
Download fulltext
Rate this document:

Rate this document:
(Not yet reviewed)


text:
An Information Theoretic Combination of MFCC and TDOA Features for Speaker Diarization

This correspondence describes a novel system for speaker diarization of meetings recordings based on the combination of acoustic features (MFCC) and time delay of arrivals (TDOAS). The first part of the paper analyzes differences between MFCC and TDOA features which possess completely different statistical properties. When Gaussian mixture models are used, experiments reveal that the diarization system is sensitive to the different recording scenarios (i.e., meeting rooms with varying number of microphones). In the second part, a new multistream diarization system is proposed extending previous work on information theoretic diarization. Both speaker clustering and speaker realignment steps are discussed; in contrary to current systems, the proposed method avoids to perform the feature combination averaging log-likelihood scores. Experiments on meetings data reveal that the proposed approach outperforms the GMM-based system when the recording is done with varying number of microphones.

Published in:
IEEE Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing, 19, 2, 431-438

 Record created 2010-11-17, last modified 2018-01-28

External link:
Download fulltext
Related documents
Rate this document:

Rate this document:
(Not yet reviewed)


text:
Experimental Evaluation of Several Strategies for Human Motion Based Transparency Control

Human interactive robots continue to improve human quality of life with their diverse applications. Their field includes, but is not limited to, haptic devices, force feedback tele-manipulation, surgical co-manipulation, medical rehabilitation, and various multi-degree of freedom robotic devices where the human operator and robot are often required to simultaneously execute tasks and collaborate with a specific share of forces/energy. More than tuning mechanical design, the robot control enhancement with a force sensor, is the key for increasing transparency (i.e the capacity for a robot to follow human movements without any human-perceptible resistive forces). With ail ideal robot control, the interaction between robot and human Would be extremely natural and fluid that the comanipulation of tasks Would seem to be achieved with a transparent aid from the robot. For Such, the classical force feedback control in certain cases still seems insufficient as is often limited by various factors (noise, bandwidth limitation, stability, sensor cost..etc). Our experiments are focused on evaluating the performance increase in terms of transparency of controller by using human motion predictions. We evaluate several ways to use predictive informations in the control to overcome present transparency limitations during a simple comanipulation pointing task.

Published in:
Experimental Robotics, 54, 557-565
Times Cited: 0
11th International Symposium on Experimental Robotics (ISER)
Jul 13-16, 2008
Athens, GREECE
European Robot Res Network

 Record created 2012-09-18, last modified 2018-01-28

Rate this document:

Rate this document:
(Not yet reviewed)