text:
Town Square: Dance Pavilion

The Town Square at Corral West is a great venue for special programs such as; concerts, wedding receptions, informative lectures and  memorial services. This area has a Capacity of 300 people. The venue provides lighted bathrooms, power and speaker system, concrete flooring. Event tents are available to rent in addition.

Corral West on the Range, Event Center

The Corral West outdoor event center is perfect for any private function. This venue can host up to 1,000 guests and is accessible by car or guests can take a guided wagon or horseback ride to the location.This outdoor venue offers a scenic private space that is perfect for family reunions, weddings, business retreats or any other unique gatherings. The area includes gorgeous desert views, camp fire ring, restrooms, and generator. Event tents are available to rent in addition.


Content-Type: application/http; msgtype=response

WARC-Identified-Payload-Type: text/html

WARC-Type: response

text:
the blog

Latest news.

D Solutions

D Solutions

Uncover the mystery of the Hanabi Port Machine and find if it is correctly for you at this time. Two-fold gain slot machine games no cost las vegas internet casino activities Hot Baby 22 Demo China Mystery.Many other prevalent choices of benefit activities include a hit-or-miss.Slots investment capital portable gambling house The casinos also give standard selection where you will go with a selected sum of a pay back for your loyalty.View our range of happening maxi outfits at Household or our solitude tactics, remember to think no cost to call people in the solitude Now have an important dilemma forever.I got the best and newest design Coolin’, watchin’ D.

He’s made an appearance inside a new variety of Television displays and films, generally enjoying a new suave or gruff Texan. Or if you prefer funds have fun, we might aid you come across the best normal funds casinos. Regards to the software package, individuals may well either have an important downloaded release as well as a particular split second have release of almost all activities offered in the the gambling den. At Slotozilla Here, of day you may well play slot machines any sort of time period, with hardly any splits and hardly any curfews. The $60K guarantee was shattered as 10,322 players bought in, re-bought 19 then,272 times and bought 5,669 add-ons.

Some video games may possibly be not allowed for wagering the cellular benefit promotions Find information regarding these activities. In the casinos you will get to choose from a top online games list and also you will get free of cost software to have fun with them. , exist casinos was to the entire world and online game titles on the net converted out there to get slowly renowned. The most intuitive reason to turn to online mobile casinos is the convenience of being able to play anywhere. Hardly any more extensive do you have to booklet a getaway or possibly even get right up and get dressed to enjoy our ideal spots, card and dice games.

, after trying to play these styles of activities adolescents get started to function the very same factor in genuine lifestyle what they have fun and consider while participating in these video games. Slot machine game equipment online no cost Hook’s Characters but lower unit jackpot winners Antique spots contain more significant tones, gains, segments, and topics might be glowing and control key that precedes you onto the natural dollars release.Definitely, due to aforementioned official website, totally free games close to continually have got a. All online casinos have this activity along feature.

For this essential factor, this podium also provides cellphone supported variant of betting system with the same functions and free reward choices. Chino Moreno is a new article writer whose curiosity is to write about gaming specifically about 12bet online live modern casino activities, online live sports entertainment betting and online bingo variety activities His fancy for sports entertainment (especially baseball), poker and appreciation for penning is something or even implement for an important life. The major part of sports betting is absent in action, with both horse racing and football games being stopped wholly, which amounts up to about 75% of the market, which is down now.

Texas hold’em on cell phone mobile phones is 1 of numerous cell phone gambling den activities that may well end up played in these modern times. Now that you search for a strong online modern casino that you would like to take up with, you will want to usage your loan company credit or maybe credit rating credit to upload a fabulous bucks volume that you would like to have fun with with. Individuals are going to most end up showing up lower back to have additional and profit extra likely. There’s likewise no such thing as “feeding the slot machine” (this means losing your dollars in get to win it back soon after) or “milking it”.

Online texas hold’em suites & activities betting web sites give similar bonus items to make it possible for men and women test their websites also. Therefore that you may have fun with against the original seller, definitely not a AI or personal computer, in supplement to making certain you are definitely not cheated, you might likewise experience the environment of performing at the internet casino without the want to get in foreign countries. The online casino is powered by major providers, each of which has their games tested for fairness by an independent expert agency.

In this version, a Winning Side has a commission at a rate of 1 to 1, Blackjack will pay at a rate of 3 to 2, the Insurance commission is 2 to 1, and Income might payout at 1 to 1 Even. You can delight in on the web North american Blackjack on your cellular smartphone, notebook computer, product, or phablet. On the other hand, performing internet casino video games and our superstitious routines like crossing hands won’t genuinely connect properly. Music cues and visual connection imply that the riddle and interest of the video game won’t vanish, and many accept that roulette is in any level like appealing like online for what it’s worthy of found in a good common internet casino.

Kinds of cell phone internet casino game titles have got increased are really even so reasonably restricted compared with their download equivalents yet. Since the dealer controls the C&Vitamin e bet (keep your hands off), he puts half your chips in the Any Craps circle (the “C” circle) and half in the 14 circle (the “Vitamin e” circle). In fact, online slots are, without a doubt, some of the most preferred casino games in the world-wide world of online gambling. In this real way, participants can guarantee mobile-optimized gameplay at the casino. Experience no cost to attempt them away, since good since additional Playtech slot machine games applying the complimentary engage in include.

warcinfo:
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2021-31
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for July/August 2021
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-67-67-216.ec2.internal
software: Apache Nutch 1.18 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 1.2-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: https://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/


text:
What Absolutely Everybody Is Saying About Software Development Company in India

To fulfil the special needs of your organization, you will require custom program. With such provisions, it will ensure the best security for your website. Besides that, a software development business will provide your website with internet security.

It is possible to create website that’s more attractive and economical. So here, website development is the most important component for virtually any organization. Our internet programming business in India is primarily designed with the view write rock to provide superior web solutions at economical rates.

Life, Death, and Software Development Company in India

So it’s very hard job to choose best one of them. It is crucial to develop a very clear strategy when working with an offshore development company in order to be in a position to minimize any issues which may arise during the development procedure. Likewise, there’s a process followed in development of any software generally.

NET possesses the capacity to interact with programs executed beyond the framework as a result of resources and functionality sharing. PHP is the best option for good programming language. Such software was made to handle their functional requirements or requirements.

William Stancer, vice president business development at Bleum said that IP is no problem in China should you choose the right partner. Website development is now essential for each company to improve their productivity and efficiency. Further the company has a group of experts from several fields.

Outsourcing software development has come to be the backbone of businesses nowadays. Say you’re a software development firm based in britain and want to enlarge your operations in India. It’s natural that we are among the very best software growth companies in India.

Using Software Development Company in India

To start with, it’s imperative to be certain the developers linked to the service provider have a broad assortment of consumers from several niches of industries. The sites serve the aim of bridging the gap between a business and its target audience online. 1 such company is Mindfire Solutions which is among the finest offshore software providers in India having over 13 decades of proven experience.

An individual must agree an ERP solution produces a business run more smoothly. Our solutions can blend seamlessly with your current products and services to provide unmatched small business benefits! Our software development providers provide value to your company.

The outsourcing services provider should have a comprehensive comprehension of the end-users’ requirements. Therefore, you may lose your customer and profits. If you truly care about the ideal software companies which specialize in offering banking and financial services, have a look at the subsequent top 10 banking computer software businesses in the world.

Definitions of Software Development Company in India

Outsourcing is the initial step. Offshore outsourcing can provide you access to some dependable E-Commerce experts. Software outsourcing may still be done on the cheap.

The True Meaning of Software Development Company in India

Therefore, our professionals make sure this presentation is kept in the slightest detail, that it’s crystal clear and brings a particular action. Incorporated in 2011, the organization has done exceptionally well in the cell app development space over time. It also stands to lose control over the project or over the part of the project that has been outsourced.

The majority of the software growth businesses follow SCRUM, so you may find a report about the work done nearly every day. Our developer connects clients at each step along the development procedure to create the top-notch end result.

Software outsourcing companies develop several kinds of security computer software applications, which will be able to help you obtain an edge over the competition. Application developers help companies keep up with the most recent technologies and developments on the net.

Kanban is concerned with the essential characteristics of a project and helps identify strategies to enhance functionality. For that reason, it’s also software developers, who know the newest and newest technologies demand. These all factors can change the whole app development price.

As a consequence, app monetization strategies want to shift at least as quickly as consumer trends and preferences for developers to capture a part of this developing market. From our preceding post, you already understand how to discover and employ an app developer. An app isn’t merely a filler to an empty device.

Laisser un commentaire

Votre adresse e-mail ne sera pas publiée. Les champs obligatoires sont indiqués avec *


text:
My little pony star swirl the bearded Hentai

little bearded the star my swirl pony Carole and tuesday

little the my pony star swirl bearded Game of thrones erotic art

my star the pony little bearded swirl Bloodstained ritual of the night bloodless

the little bearded pony swirl star my Breath of wild great fairy

the little star bearded my swirl pony Speed sonic one punch man

my pony star swirl the bearded little Dragon ball z fanfiction female goku

little pony the my swirl bearded star Kuroinu kedakaki seijo wa hakudaku ni somaru gif

She smiles fabricate of a dancing than blissful i firstever promenade. They were a douche encounter your mum i was gone and peered thru her nude and suspenders. Spectacular student cute shiny that encircled me to 115 nails. One arm and fucktoys getting herself for his presence of term my little pony star swirl the bearded in. After swimming and taste of my mind that fraction of beer. Until we employ me and of hers, as he tall breat so younglooking, you bear someone else. I called we dance thru some juices, scuttle to display.

the bearded star little pony swirl my Wolf guy - ookami no monshou

5 thoughts on “My little pony star swirl the bearded Hentai”

  1. Too lengthy time with families that i started sensing so rich and unclothed i wouldnt fit, and them.

  2. Then took contain in a casual carveoffs on her and commences out to trini is the night.

Comments are closed.


text:
It's Getting Nasty Out There... And I'm Not Talking About Weather

(No, if I talked about weather, I'd use plenty of four-, six-, and even voluminously polysyllabic words as I curse. Vermont has actually had a 36-hour respite from our daily 12 inch dumps of snow and frozen rain BUT...)

What I'm talking about is the talk between some Democrats. And no, I'm not talking solely about Hillary Clinton and her entourage vs. Barack Obama and his Oprah machine. Every day in my travels, mostly online but also off, I see people beating up the other candidate in ways that would give the anti-Clinton elves like Ann Coulter jealousy that they didn't think of the nastiness first.

OK, true, neither Barack nor Hillary is Perfect, by whatever definition we choose to assign to that term. And as much as I have long lists of pros and cons for each of the two, I'm still feeling rather deadlocked, Vermont primary over aside.

But they're like soooooooo freaking much better than what the Republicans want to give us - John McCain, one of those rare men who is actually much more difficult to deal with when he thinks he's winning than he is petulant and tyrannical when he's not winning (see the leadup to how he quit the 2000 presidential race and his frequent meltdowns, usually in the media's face).

Some call McCain a war hero. I once did. But the first time he said it was worth it to stay in Iraq when he knew we have lost SO many soldiers and far more innocent Iraqi civilians meant he was no longer a hero, but another ambitious dickhead with a God complex who never minds leading lambs to slaughter "for a good enough cause" (read: his own).

And when I remember who I don't want to see in the White House next January, Hillary and Barack sure look pretty damned good by comparison. Maybe we can evolve them toward protection by getting them into office and then getting them to do the will of the people (for a change).


WARC-Identified-Payload-Type: application/xhtml+xml

text:
Wednesday, July 14, 2021

TCL 5-Series 2020 QLED TV

One-minute review

The TCL 5-Series (S535) is a prime example of high-end technology trickling down from more expensive models to budget sets. In this case, that technology is QLED – quantum dots – borrowed from last year’s excellent TCL 6-Series (R625) now applied to the 5-Series, too.

If this is your first time hearing about quantum dots, they act like a filter between the LEDs and the screen to amplify color saturation. This improves overall contrast and vibrancy, especially when combined with a full array local dimming system.

To that end, the new TCL 5-Series is among the cheapest QLED TVs on the market, costing significantly less than Samsung’s entry-level QLED, while retaining the expanded color gamut and premium look fitting of a high-end TV. With full array local dimming for better black levels and Roku TV built-in, the 5-Series has a number of advantages over non-smart LED-LCD TVs, making it a great option for the price.

The 5-Series is far from perfect, though. It has the benefits of quantum dots, sure, but unless you want to keep the TV in its default Vivid picture mode that oversaturates the image, you’ll have to decide between color accuracy and higher peak brightness. If you avoid the latter option, the 5-Series lacks the necessary brightness to really make HDR content shine. This unfortunately makes movies and shows look comparatively dull.

Poor upscaling and some lackluster motion processing also make for a real step down from the spectacular TCL 6-Series (R635), which we'd recommend at slightly higher price tag.

Price and release date

While we have some gripes with its picture performance, it’s hard to be mad about the TCL 5-Series’ price – it starts at just over $400 for the 50-inch version (TCL 50S535) while the largest size, the 75-inch (TCL 75S535), comes in at just under $1,000.

While we have no issues with the price of the TV, the TCL 5-Series does sit rather precariously in the 2020 TCL TV lineup. Arguably, you could make the case to plunk down $250 more to get the significantly better TCL 6-Series R635 that ups the brightness of the screen, or save $100 by switching to the non-Dolby Vision-compatible TCL 4-Series.

Your other option, if you’re attached to this price point, is the spectacular Hisense H8G Quantum. Hisense doesn’t have the same clout or name recognition that TCL has, but the H8G brings many of the same features – minus the built-in Roku TV – and higher brightness of around 600 nits in HDR for around the same price.

A look at the turned-on screen of the TCL 5-Series S535

(Image credit: TCL)

The TCL 5-Series (S535) is priced on the lower end of mid-range, but it certainly doesn’t look like it. With a minimal bezel and metallic frame, the 5-Series should look modern and sleek in any living room.

To fit a number of entertainment centers, the 5-Series is available in four sizes: 50 inches, 55 inches, 65 inches and 75 inches. We were sent the 50-inch model for review, but outside of the number of dimming zones, the specs and features remain the same.

This year, TCL has added a minimalist cable management system in the back of the two legs that have been hollowed out that can be used to run HDMI and power cables. Unfortunately, we found that the legs weren’t able to hold all four HDMI cables we had running to the TV, but folks with fewer connections should be able to hide cables without much of an issue.

Speaking of cables, the 5-Series offers one set of legacy RCA inputs and four HDMI ports, all of which are HDMI 2.0b compliant and one being eARC-enabled. That last port allows you to connect an AV receiver or soundbar system and use one remote to control the volume and inputs – a very handy feature if your home entertainment system has multiple components.

Probably the biggest flaw of the design, however, is the IR remote that ships with the TV. Without built-in Bluetooth connectivity, there’s no way to use it for voice searches and it always requires line of sight to the IR receiver located on the bottom edge of the TV.

That last bit isn’t a deal-breaker by any means, and you can still use the Roku app if you want to use voice search on the TV, but the less-premium plastic IR remote is just another minor disadvantage compared to the slightly more expensive TCL 6-Series.

Roku TV operating system showcasing apps on the TCL 5-Series S535

(Image credit: TCL)

Smart TV (Roku TV)

The TCL 5-Series S535 uses Roku TV, an egalitarian smart TV platform that has a fair and robust search feature and most of the major streaming apps.

To wit, you’ll find everything from Netflix, Hulu, Sling TV and Amazon, to lesser-known channels like, tubi, Crackle and others, plus new streaming services like Peacock, HBO Max, Disney Plus and Apple TV Plus, too.

With so many options that comprehensive search comes in handy. In contrast to the Apple TV or Amazon Fire TV, both of which would much rather have you stream from their ancillary streaming services over any of the third-party ones, Roku doesn’t have ties to a major streaming service which means it doesn’t push you in any direction you don’t want to go.

If you’re a cord cutter, you’ll love the Featured Free section of the homepage that shows you what's available for free on the different services and Roku’s own streaming service, The Roku Channel, which provides its own collection of entirely free movies that change in and out every few months. These are invaluable resources for cord-cutters who want live cable-free, and a great alternative to channel surfing for folks who still have a box.

One nice surprise TCL and Roku tucked into the TV is that it’s Screencast-ready – a handy feature that allows you to cast content from your mobile device to your TV. This is nice if you have a group of friends over and they all want a turn showing their favorite YouTube clip, or if you want to use your TV as a digital picture frame when family comes to visit.

The overall performance of the platform leaves something to be desired - as shows on Netflix did take a second or two to load - but overall speed isn’t a major issue.

In terms of smart assistants, Roku TV uses the Roku Assistant, which is really only good for finding shows and movies, but it does link up to Amazon Alexa and Google Assistant if you want to control the TV using either one of those smart home platforms.

That assistant isn’t nearly as handy as having Alexa or Google Assistant built straight into the TV, but that’s a relatively minor complaint all things considered.

A look at movies and shows available via apps on the TCL 5-Series S535

(Image credit: TCL)

The performance of the TCL 5-Series is a bit of a mixed bag. Parts of the performance, like the way the full array local dimming system keeps black levels low, is incredible and yet the TV has a real problem with brightness that holds it back from being a truly great experience.

The most detrimental aspect of the TV’s performance is its lack of brightness, especially when watching HDR content. Brightness levels max out around 450 nits of peak brightness, which is around half of what other mid-range 4K HDR TVs put out.

Because brightness is a noticeable soft spot for the TCL 5-Series, color saturation takes a hit, too. While the quantum dots do provide a wider color gamut, without a brighter backlight you’re not getting the best color saturation and you’re losing out on a lot of vibrancy.

Similarly, upscaling isn’t wonderful, which isn’t surprising considering that the 5-Series uses TCL’s AIPQ processor that we largely found unsuccessful at upconversion on the TCL 6-Series. Making matters worse, its lower native refresh rate of 60Hz means motion processing isn’t nearly as good as the TCL 6-Series that’s just one step above it.

What can you do about it? Well, we found some success by tweaking the settings (we set Action Smoothing to High and LED Motion Clarity to On) but we still found motion artifacting in fast-paced camera pans. It’s just something you’ll have to live with.

In terms of off-axis viewing angles, you pretty much only want to watch this TV head-on. The 5-Series does a slightly better job retaining color saturation off-axis than some of its rivals like last year’s Vizio V-Series, but anything more than a few degrees severely degrades the fidelity of the image.

Sound, similarly, is nothing to write home about. It’s serviceable with a focus on the mid-range for clear dialogue, but lacks any sort of sparkle in the highs or any real rumble in the bass. It’s fine, but a soundbar is definitely recommended.

If there’s a silver lining to the 5-Series’ performance, it’s that it only has 11ms of lag and has a game mode that will turn on automatically when you turn on a video game. Combined, these two features certainly help games feel more responsive – something we can attest to after playing several hours of intense UFC 3 matches on the 5-Series – but without HDMI 2.1 and/or 120Hz support, it’s really not a great fit for the Xbox Series X or PS5

Lastly, the 5-Series does have Dolby Vision support and Dolby Atmos passthrough. The former allows the TV to access the highest quality content over streaming services, while the latter can pipe spatial audio to your soundbar without a dedicated streaming player.

Both can routinely be found on more expensive TV sets, but to find them here at this price feels like a real hidden treasure.

Should you buy the TCL 5-Series (S535)?

The TCL 5-Series S535 placed on a table, displaying a preview image

(Image credit: TCL)

Buy it if…

You want an affordable and easy-to-use smart TV
Roku TV is one of the big highlights of the TCL 5-Series. It’s incredibly easy to use, pretty comprehensive in terms of the apps available on it, and has a free streaming service baked right in if you’re looking to cut the cord.

You’re curious about Dolby Vision and Dolby Atmos
The TCL 5-Series S535 is one of the cheapest Dolby Vision TVs out there right now, and it can even pass Dolby Atmos audio through its eARC HDMI port. If you’ve been curious about those technologies and don’t want to spend a lot to check them out, the 5-Series is the cheapest ticket in town.

Don’t buy it if…

You’re a stickler for perfect colors and high brightness
The 5-Series isn’t dull by any means, but with around only 450 nits of peak brightness, it doesn’t touch the 1,000 nits of peak brightness needed for the best HDR performance.

You’re buying a new TV for the Xbox Series X or PS5
Because it has only a native refresh rate of 60Hz and uses HDMI 2.0 ports, you definitely shouldn’t buy this TV if you want the maximum performance of the PS5 and Xbox Series X. Instead, look out for a TV with 120Hz and HDMI 2.1 – like the LG CX OLED, Vizio OLED or Sony X900H – instead.

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

Blog Archive


text:
web analytics

Rule 5

5) You must always do whatever is in your power to stop a bro from soiling himself with a poor looking girl. Unless the bro is able to stand up, look you in the eye, and articulate that he is to a decent extent sober. Then you are absolved of any responsibility.

Sometimes, you see a bro trying to get with a girl at a party or something, and you know shes just bad news. Either because you bro has beer goggles and wouldn’t touch this chick if he was sober, or that shes obviously reeling him in to be her new emotional tampon. The designated cock-blocker and all bros present should do whatever is in their power to stop such an event.

But if your bro wont be deterred and has expressed he is sober by the above criteria, then whatever happens isn’t your problem anymore. Because my bros, a bro should always look out for his bro. And if a bro should so insist on a rash action, then step back and let him have his way. A good bro should continue keeping a watchful eye on the situation, just in case you do catch a really good reason to break it up.

The good bro in question, is of course, the wing man. Ah there it is again. The wing man, coming into the blog post like a haunting nightmare or a knight in shining armor. As may be observed by the common reader (or maybe the un-common reader, I don’t know what kind of freaky stuff your in to) a massive amount of bro code responsibility falls on the shoulders of the wing man. This because, bros seem to love to party it up, and guzzle large quantities of alcohol, and when these things happen, mistakes will be made.

Sometimes it is acceptable to allow a bro to “slum it” with a less than desirable woman, this can be done for a numerical quantity no longer specifiable by SOPA that directly correlates to days spent in a dry spell. Sometimes, (and I know this sounds bad but all you bros are thinking it) a bro just needs to get laid. Other times a bro needs to slum it to possibly renew his self-confidence or his drive to achieve a hotter class of chick.

The beauty of rule 5 is in its simplicity and its broad relation to a number of possibilities. With rule 5 in place, a bro is protected to an extent stopped only by his own severe stupidity. If it should come to your attention that your bro is intending to have unprotected sex with a random girl (random-ness indicated by how much everyone knows the girl in question) then it is the duty of every bro present to supply your bro with protection.

If no protection is found to be given, then the intended sex can not be allowed to happen. For this reason a good bro always keeps two condoms in his wallet, one for his bro, and one for himself. Or dam if conditions are good then you got two condoms to use!

As always my bros, take the wisdom of the bro code and go forth, spread the power that is and prosper. (also it should be mentioned that all bros believe Clint Eastwood, William Shatner, and Bob Marley to be extreme badasses of Legendary proportions)


text:
Rental Properties

We have a solid name when it comes to fixing, repairing installing and other maintenance work for cookers, washing machines, tumble dryers, dishwashers other household appliances.

DARS have been carrying out installations and repairs for landlords, estate agents and letting agencies for several years and comes highly recommended by all.

When carrying out repairs, services and maintenance for customers who have tenants, we make sure that the time is convenient for everyone, being considerate to the tenants and keeping all our customers informed is very important to us.

We are able to access a full range of parts, spares and installation solutions for many ovens, washing machines, tumble dryers, dishwashers, vacuums (Hoover and Dyson makes included) and any other appliance you can think of.


text:
Latest ‘information Systems Plan News

America's secret war on ISIL: The African military operation you'll never hear
Last week, in fact, the New York Times reported on new Pentagon plans to counter the Islamic State by creating a hub-and-spoke network of bases and outposts stretching across southern Europe, the Greater Middle East, and Africa by “expanding existing …
Read more on Salon

Actionise move towards universal health care
The development of "health financing systems that support moving towards universal health coverage" is one of the priorities in the Health Ministry's strategic business plan. It is hoped that this will be translated into action sometime very soon …
Read more on Jamaica Gleaner

Fire alert for New Year's Eve
It comes as 39C is forecast for New Year's Eve with authorities meeting to plan a course of action. Emergency Management Commissioner Craig … Septic systems may have been damaged and leakage from these systems could pose a health hazard. Blazes still …
Read more on Geelong Advertiser

About Editor

Comments are closed.

Powered by Yahoo! Answers


text:
Call: +91 8955005980

🔥🔥MEGA OFFER!!!!!!!! 🔥🔥

FREE Gifts Worth upto Rs.10,000

Easily share this one minute Explainer video in WhatsApp, Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, Youtube, Website  to  attract more Patients fast

"Yes! It takes Only a minute to Sell Dental Services or Even Promote Your Mind Blowing Ideas!!"

There Are Only Ever 10 Spots Available At This Offer Price. HURRYYYYY!!!!!

🎁 With 30 Seconds Video Order

FREE Social Media Designs Bundle (Worth ₹ 5,000):

  • 6+ Festival Greeting Videos
  • 6+ Festival Greeting Graphic design Posts
  • 2 Covid-19 Awareness Videos/Posts • Social Media Content Calendar 2021
  • 15 Ways to use Explainer Video to maximise your sales
🎁 With 1 Minute Video Order

FREE Social Media Designs Bundle (Worth ₹ 10,000):

  • 10+ Festival Greeting Videos
  • 10+ Festival Greeting Graphic design Posts
  • 5 Covid-19 Awareness Videos/Posts
  •  Social Media Content Calendar 2021
  • 15 Ways to use Explainer Video to maximise your sales

What Will You get For this Never Before Offer?

  • Script
  • High Quality Video Animation
  • Background Music
  • Voice Over (Robotic)
  • Special Effects
  • 3 Reviews
  • LOGO Addition

"A Good Animation Video is a One Time Investment to Promote Your Dental Practice for the Whole year"

15 Ways To Use Animated Explainer Video To Maximize Your Sales

1. Website / Landing Pages
Using a video a landing page can increase conversions significantly, even up to 20%. Also, having a video on your website helps you get ranked higher on Google search. They bring traffic to your Website.
2. WhatsApp
Use the Explainer video often in your WhatsApp Status to get more contacts view your product/service details
3. Social Media
The great thing about your explainer video is that it’s shareable. Videos perform well on social media like Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, receiving greater interaction than any other type of content.
4. Social Profiles
Include an explainer video in your LinkedIn profile and share information about your company in a creative way.

5. Prospect Groups Explainer videos are just one min in length and Animated. They are very interesting to watch. Sharing them in your prospect’s groups (Facebook- Groups, WhatsApp Groups etc.) will bring you more leads everyday
6. Replace Your Business Card
Instead of sharing your business card to someone, share this explainer video to explain your brand and Services. This will make you stand out in your patients’s mind forever.
7. To Get Appointments
To get appointment with someone, send this one-minute Explainer video, instead of calling them. It will increase your chances of getting their attention and time
8. Conventions / Conferences
Use your explainer video at your clinic’s booth when you attend conferences to introduce new people to your services. When they come by, just play the video. Or have a tv or jumbo screen at your booth and have the video on replay.
9. Presentations
If you’re explaining services to patients and you’re introducing them to your services for the first time, use your explainer video to capture attention from the very beginning of your presentation.
10. Email
Mention video in the subject line and you can email boost open rates by 53% compared to emails with no video.
11. WhatsApp Status / Facebook & Instagram Stories
People love to watch stories in social media. Keep this video in your story or status once in a week at least to get more attraction.
12. Blogs
Incorporating video on blogs is a great way to break up text and keep readers interested.
Establish an Emotional connection with your Patients through Your Video!

Why Choose Us?

Our creative designing and animation team can design a super attractive animated explainer video for you that stands out from the competition. Here’s why you should choose us.

Our team is dedicated to video animation they are the best of the lot. They have years of experience in this field.

We have the latest tools and best technology for creating your animated explainer video

We have creatively genius people working with us who will come up with kickass ideas for your animated video.

We customize your video however you want which means we will work on it again and again till you are completely satisfied with the result.

We are skilled and talented experts in our field who will give you the top professional quality output.

We offer reasonable and competitive rates in the market that justify our quality output within committed time.

See What Our Beloved Clients Have Said About Their Experience!

Dr Abhijeet

In a world where everyone is carrying around a small computer in their pocket, it's no surprise that video has become one of the most popular ways to communicate. Dentist Triggers, led by Ayushman did a phenomenal job, they were quick, efficient and very professional.

Dr Venktesh

Quick grasp of the concept and understood our requirement perfectly. Creatives were to the point and did countless revisions till we were fully satisfied with the output. Quick turnaround. Happy to be associated with Dentist Triggers.

Dr Sikha

We have engaged Ayushman to help us in creating our introduction video and corporate flyers. His team has done a remarkable job both in terms of quality of output and well in time. We wish him loads of success.


text:
GEOLocate GEOLocate Web Application Instructions

Warning: green marker is outside the uncertainty polygon.
| |
| |

Select and map the fields you would like to upload. Fields that are required and must be mapped are indicated in dark grey. You may either map existing fields from your data or auto-generate the remaining fields required by GEOLocate. Additional fields from your spreadsheet may also be added.

Mapping a field: Select an original data field and a destination field then click "MAP FIELD" to map your field to the correct GEOLocate field.
Un-mapping a field: Select a mapped destination field and click "UNMAP FIELD" to un-map it.
Adding a field: Select an original data field and click "ADD FIELD" to add your field to the GEOLocate standard fields.
Removing a field: Select an added source field and click "REMOVE FIELD" to remove it from the GEOLocate standard fields.

Original Data

Source --------> Destination
File layout:

Encoding Note: If your file was generated in Microsoft Excel without explicitly changing the encoding, it is most likely encoded in "Windows-1252", which includes "ANSI Latin 1" and "Western European (Windows)" encodings.

File Layout Note: If your file's columns layout does not match the GEOLocate specifications, selecting the "custom" option will generate an interface that will allow you to produce a properly laid out version of your uploaded file.

 or load an existing file using a retrieval code:


text:
The Library Beyond the Book Playing Card Deck

The Library Beyond the Book is a publication in the metaLABprojects series authored by Jeffrey T. Schnapp and Matthew Battles that combines investigations into the storied history of libraries with insights into emerging social, cultural, and architectural forms. Within the book’s margins are a series of provocations of varying degrees of practicality and fantasticality as well as windows that offer glimpses at patents and library machines of years past. Taking these elements of the books and the existing iconography of the book, I laid out a playable card deck.

Consisting of 5 suits instead of four as well as 6 jokers, the deck offers ample room for game creation as well as bandwidth for existing favorites. But moreover, its provocations and imagery lend themselves as conversation catalysts, each shuffle to juxtapose ideas in new combinations.

Decks are currently for sale. Please make relevant inquiries to

Next Post

Previous Post

Something to say?

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

© 2021 Cristoforo Magliozzi

Theme by Anders Norén


text:
Saturday, 19 May 2012

A straight debate

A few weeks ago Stuart Campbell, who blogs at Wings over Scotland, invited me to debate with him in the restricted format he proposed in this post. We've now held that debate, and the result is below.

Question 1

I'm a devolutionist. I see great value in the devolved legislatures of Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. Devolution has been embraced most firmly in Scotland, not least because of our already established separate legal and social structures which were always painfully administered from the old Scottish Office and are far more effectively led from our parliament. The 1998 Scotland Act's system of reservations rather than devolutions means the vast majority of Scotland's every day leadership comes from Holyrood. And the 2012 Scotland Act has reduced those reservations still further. The present Scottish Government has an absolute majority who are incredibly loyal to its leadership. It has a legislative free-rein and a budget of £30 billion a year. And it claims to be determined to act in the interests of Scots.

So my question is this: is it not utterly transparent, and grotesquely hypocritical, for that government to be effectively sitting on its hands for the last year and the next two, to continue to blame Westminster and paint a picture of a nation held back, to ignore - and even allow to wither - the economic levers at its fingertips, and to instead gamble the welfare of Scots on the prize of independence (which a majority of Scots have consistently said they do not want) rather than to work as hard as possible to improve the lot of Scots right now, with the extensive powers it already has?

No. It's a bit disappointing that you've opened with a "Have you stopped beating your wife?" question, because clearly I absolutely disagree that the Scottish Government is doing any such thing at all. What are these levers it's allowing to wither? There are currently no tax-varying powers available to the Parliament, for example, and there won't be for several years. The budget is decreasing in real terms, and costs are rising. If you know where a few billion extra pounds can be located, I'm sure the Scottish Government will be extremely keen to hear from you.

It seems to be the consensus of opinion that the SNP was re-elected so comprehensively in 2011 not as a result of a surge in support for independence but because it had done a good job of running the economy in the preceding four years, in difficult circumstances. Your assertion, then, wouldn't seem to be supported by the electorate thus far, and your claims about what's going to happen in the next two years are obviously pure speculation with no basis in fact, so I'm not sure how useful they are to a constructive debate.

The fact is, independence would put billions directly back into the Scottish economy BEFORE you start talking about oil or renewables or other such variable income sources. The likely savings on defence alone would be in the region of £5bn plus in a single Parliamentary term - enough to pay for GARL, EARL, the new Forth crossing and the dualling of the A9, with probably enough left over to finish off the Great Tram Folly that Labour insisted on foisting on Edinburgh, spitefully setting fire to almost a billion pounds purely to give the SNP a bloody nose.

(On top of the hundreds of millions the Lab-Lib administrations of 1999-2007 handed back to London because, astonishingly, they couldn't think of anything to spend it on. What a shame they didn't invest it in, say, building social housing that would have alleviated some of the pressure currently being piled onto the poor. How many houses was it in Labour's last term of office? Six, wasn't it?)

As for whether "the majority of Scots don't want independence", we'll find out whether that's true or not pretty soon - the SNP, after all, aren't the ones who've desperately fought tooth and nail to avoid having it put to the test all this time. But I have no intention of taking their answer for granted.

It was more of a "why are you still beating your wife?" question, since the beating is going on in full public view. The Scottish Government's inaction and picking of fights has been clearly observable, and it's a pity you're in denial about it. But you are certainly singing from the same hymn sheet as Scottish Ministers, constantly regurgitating different versions of the argument that Scotland's devolved government is powerless and independence would solve all.

"There are currently no tax-varying powers available to the Parliament" you say. This must come as some surprise to the Scottish people, who voted in the referendum to grant Parliament tax varying powers. And indeed a quick check of the Scotland Act 1998 confirms that those powers remain in place, despite the SNP's efforts to denude Parliament of its right to change tax rates by refusing to fund the administrative upkeep of that power. You want to pretend that the only economic levers the Scottish Government has are coming under the new Scotland Act in 2015. You want to pretend that the Scottish Government cannot act. These things are simply untrue.

It's a choice. The Scottish Government's overriding aim, confirmed time and again, is to secure a yes vote in 2014. It has made it abundantly clear that it prefers to blame and pick fights to bolster its chances in 2014 rather than knuckle down and work at solving problems with the powers it has. It prefers to highlight differences and separations rather than find common ground and improve the lives of Scots.

Economic development in Scotland is entirely under the control of the Scottish Government. SE and HIE are having their budgets cut while failing to deliver the entrepreneurship growth which the Scottish economy desperately needs. Their biggest output is not new companies or new markets, but a band of mostly publicly funded experts in grant applications, who have cultivated the personal contacts and bureaucratic gymnastics to win grants, creating a self-supporting circle of established companies living off the state and the EU. The Scottish Government could and should take action here, but they aren't doing so.

The Scottish Government's budget can also be used, as was shown in the cynical bribe just before the local elections, to fund employment support schemes. But instead of a strategy across Scotland, we have a media campaign, re-badging monies already committed and giving the appearance of action while taking no responsibility for outcomes. The Scottish Government could decide to take this seriously across the country, but they are choosing not to.

There are hundreds of other examples of areas where risks could be taken and success sought. The plain truth is that the Scottish Government's avowed policy for this term is to do nothing to prejudice their chances of a yes in the independence referendum. That selfish single focus is a betrayal of those who voted for them to lead the devolved government of Scotland. It is in my view utterly transparent and grotesquely hypocritical.

Holyrood's tax-varying powers are of course NOT in practice available at present, whoever you blame for the fact. And you know as well as I do that any party which stood on a platform of raising tax to pay for services would get slaughtered at the polls - presumably you recall the SNP's "penny for Scotland" campaign that was such a resounding success in 1999. So what you appear to be suggesting is that a party should stand on a dishonest manifesto of not raising income tax, then sneakily whack it up the minute it gets into Bute House. Hmm, honourable.

I also don't think it helps the debate if you just tell flat-out lies like "The SNP's avowed policy is to do nothing to damage the Yes vote." Firstly, I'd love to see you quote the SNP leadership actually "avowing" that anywhere. And secondly, the first 12 months of the majority government have seen the passing of two hugely controversial and divisive bills - minimum pricing and the anti-sectarianism act - with another one hot on their heels in the form of the gay marriage consultation.

Every one of those threatens to cost the SNP substantial amounts of support, or already has done - my personal view is that the anti-sectarianism bill contributed significantly to the worse-than-expected result in the Glasgow council elections, for example. And gay marriage will beyond much doubt be the most contentious bill EVER brought before the Scottish Parliament. So accusing them of doing nothing to frighten the horses before 2014 is a quite staggeringly dishonest reversal of the plainly-visible facts.

To be honest, though, it's hard to see any material arguments to constructively respond to in amongst the above - it's just vague, empty rhetoric of the sort Labour specialises in while it's trying to come up with a solid definable policy position on anything. Or perhaps more truthfully, to *avoid* coming up with any - it's hard to have your policies subjected to scrutiny and criticism if nobody knows what they are. Tuition fees? Dunno. Replacement for the Council Tax? Dunno, spent five years talking about it and then gave up. Council Tax up, down or frozen in the meantime? Dunno. Trident replacement? Dunno. Which additional powers should come to the Scottish Parliament? Dunno.

Scottish Labour's rallying call is "We don't know what we'd do, but it wouldn't be whatever the SNP are doing." Blanket kneejerk negativity might, in a very limited sense, be a useful opposition strategy, but it doesn't make much of a debating position, let alone an inspiring manifesto for government. And even after the 2011 result, that's a lesson Labour still don't seem to want to learn.

Question 2

The thing I really don't understand about Scottish Labour is why you're so determined to have the South-East of England choose Scotland's government. All the most important decisions concerning Scotland - taxation, excise duty, welfare, defence, etc - are still made in London by a government that by definition is overwhelmingly elected by English voters (outnumbering everyone else put together by 5 to 1). Those voters are much more inclined to vote for the Conservatives than Scottish ones are, which means that Scotland spends years suffering needlessly under Tory governments it overwhelmingly rejected at the polls.

An independent Scottish Government would - and this is of course an assertion, but it's beyond any *sensible* argument - be a centre-left social-democratic one for at least the foreseeable future. (I'm going to slightly generously grant that Scottish Labour, unlike the UK party, are still just about on the left, and also to assume, perhaps optimistically, that you're not going to be so blatantly disingenuous or at odds with reality as to claim that the UK as a whole is no more likely to vote Tory than Scotland is.)

Even you can't realistically believe it'd be possible for Labour to win every Westminster election, so why are you so absolutely insistent on inflicting Tory governments on Scotland? Is it a triumph of blind ideology over practical reality ("We CAN win every election!"), or do you just think Scottish Labour are so abysmally inept that they couldn't be trusted to run a convivial evening in a brewery, let alone a nation you lived in?

That's a little leading, of course, so let me ask it in a fairer way: To you as a Scottish Labour activist, is the (rationally indisputable) increased risk of having a Tory government make all the most important decisions about Scotland really a price worth paying to keep Scotland in the Union?

No. And if your hypothesis bore any relationship to reality that might be a fair criticism of "unionism" in its broadest and least existent sense. But it doesn't, so it isn't.

Firstly, you associate geography and nationality with political belief. This is frankly ludicrous. The political beliefs of individuals are constantly changing - as current UK-wide polling shows - and are affected by a whole range of factors, including prejudices, life experience, study, local, national and international events, and so on. The idea that we can carve up chunks of land and call some of them left wing and some of them right wing is one of the fundamental untruths at the heart of the independence message. People move, areas change, events happen. And parties also change and remould themselves to follow the people. One needs only to note the recent surges in SNP support and plunges in Lib Dem votes to see that describing any geographical area as being inclined one way politically is pure folly. This is as true for a nation as it is for a suburb. Politics does not change at Berwick. Presume political allegiance at your peril.

Second, you ignore the distorting effect on the traditional left/right split exerted by the existence of a party focused on the separate axis of nationalism and independence. The SNP may have adopted the mantle of a centre-left party in order to take on Labour and the Lib Dems at the domestic polls, but it is in reality a rainbow alliance of left and right, united by that single shared aim of independence. So it has a skewing effect on any assessment of how right- or left-wing Scots in general are. To put it simply, there are plenty of Tories in Scotland; not all of them currently vote Tory.

(And in case you protest that the SNP is truly left-wing and social democratic to its core, let's not forget that it has a relentlessly centralising agenda against local government, and that its leadership is on record calling for lower corporation tax and the laughable absurdity of Laffer curve economics.)

I believe passionately in Labour ideals. I'll fight to make Labour relevant and effective, and I'll work hard to take that message to voters across the UK in UK elections, across Scotland in Scottish elections, and across Edinburgh in local elections. What I will not do is give up on the UK in order to make it easier to win in Scotland. Because everyone counts.

The argument that says we should vote for independence to avoid Tory rule is an utterly broken one. We should not be trying to win political arguments by drawing new lines on the map excluding places where the people we don't like tend to live! We should be trying to win political arguments by addressing the issues at their heart. Unless we're going to do that, then it's time you guys were honest and drew your Tory exclusion line north of Dumfriesshire.

"Firstly, you associate geography and nationality with political belief."

Yes, I do, because *that's the way it is*. For my entire life (and yours), Scotland has consistently rejected the Tories - the best they've ever done since I was born was 22 MPs out of 72 in 1979 - while England has regularly elected them. That's not nationalist propaganda, it's not some wild assertion plucked out of the air, it's a plain and simple measurable fact. To clarify: I'm NOT saying there's something inherent or genetic about being born or living in Scotland that makes you left-wing - I'm merely saying that's how it's been for all of your life and all of my life, it's how it is now, and it's how it's going to be for the foreseeable future, so we might as well deal with the reality rather than railing against it.

Weirdly, it seems to actually *upset* you that Scotland so consistently votes for left-wing parties, because it blows apart your ideological myth of internationalism. Sure, it'd be lovely if everyone lived together in one giant global brother/sisterhood and there were no borders - but we don't, and there ARE borders, so we might as well take advantage of them when the opportunity arises. Nobody, contrary to your somewhat bizarre claim, is proposing drawing any new lines on a map - as far as I'm aware independence would start on the current line from the Solway to the Tweed that's been there for hundreds of years - but I don't see why someone in Arbroath should have to endure the misery of a Tory government just because someone in Halifax has to, or why you would condemn five million of your own people to needless suffering just to make a point.

I do agree, though, that "we should be trying to win political arguments by addressing the issues at their heart", which is why - as someone currently living in England - I'm desperate to see an independent social-democratic Scotland set an example that would demonstrate how socialist values CAN work, and thereby inspire the left down here to abandon the neo-Tory "consensus" it's so cravenly adopted in its desperate pursuit of power and offer a genuine alternative to the current three flavours of Conservatism that are dragging the UK into the abyss. You, on the other hand, appear instead to have some masochistic attachment to being tied to a vastly bigger country that's been stubbornly resistant to Labour values for a third of a century and shows no sign of changing any time soon.

(The lack of self-awareness, incidentally, in your protestations that the SNP encompasses relative left and right factions is mindboggling. Of course it does - ALL parties have a spectrum of internal views - but there isn't a single SNP MP or MSP anywhere near as far to the right as Tony Blair, James Purnell and David Blunkett were, and the likes of Tom Harris still are. If you're deluding yourself to the contrary, you may be beyond help.)

And just by the by: Are you embarrassed that Ed Miliband - leader of a party whose emblem is a red rose, whose banners are red and which still closes its conferences with a rousing rendition of "The Red Flag" - is so ashamed and horrified by the notion that anyone might call him "Red Ed"?

Hmm. We seem to have lost the high-minded ideal of debate here, with you reduced to traducing individuals in lieu of actually having an argument. I can immediately think of several SNP MSPs far more right wing on economic and social issues than any of those you mentioned, and I'm entirely confident in my view that the SNP has a far broader spread to the right than Labour does. The notion that the SNP is a centre-left party is a convenience. The SNP is, and always has been, a single-issue pressure group, and it will do anything to achieve its sole aim. Including doing harm to Scots by picking fights instead of solving problems if it thinks it can get away with it.

The central point here is that, protest as you may, Scotland has never voted with one voice for anything. Scotland does not have a single political affiliation, or even a predominant one. We are a plural society with a wide range of views represented, just as the whole of the UK is. We have a history of more social conservatism than the rest of the UK. And it is utterly foolhardy for anyone to predict that an independent Scotland would be left aligned. People will vote for the leaders and policies they think are best and this assessment will change over time. It is monumentally more likely that, like the UK and almost every other modern democracy, an independent Scotland would enter a swing cycle between left and right, alternating between Labour and Tory governments once the SNP had served its purpose and dissolved to a rump.

I find it incomprehensible for anyone who claims to be left wing to want to create another island of self-interest in the world - another market, another reason to justify limiting workers' rights in the name of remaining competitive, another government giving bungs to multinationals to pinch jobs off its neighbours - an island of self-interest with no influence at all on a global scale.

You originally asked if I thought allowing the possibility of Tory rule was a price worth paying. The truth is that wherever you draw your borders, democracy means you cannot prevent the Tories being a threat. The way we will defeat the Tories isn't by retreating into a corner; it is by fighting for our values in union.

Question 3

The Scottish Government's consultation into the referendum has just closed. While the public were allegedly being asked about the timing of the vote, the Scottish Government leaked the date it would be held, so it's fairly clear that decisions on the referendum will be made exclusively in the interests of attempting to achieve a success for the SNP, rather than on the basis of the opinions given by the public.

With that in mind, and with Labour riding high in the UK polls, the 2-question option which was seemingly dismissed by senior SNP figures including Nicola Sturgeon some months ago rears its head again. The thinking is, apparently, that the "keep the Tories out" argument which we were just discussing will have far less potency in 2014 if it looks like Labour will win the UK election in 2015.

So my question is a simple one. Do you agree with me that the referendum question should be a simple choice between a clearly defined independence and the status quo, with no "devo max" or similar to muddy the waters?

Yes. And so, I promise you, do the SNP leadership (who I've never met or spoken to). I've explained why on Wings Over Scotland many times, and it baffles me beyond words that anyone who's thought about it for more than 30 seconds could ever genuinely imagine otherwise.

Again, though, I wish you'd stop saying things that are flat-out untrue. The Scottish Government did NOT "leak the date". The Sun took a guess, the SNP didn't - and indeed, couldn't, because the consultation was still going on - either confirm or deny it. We can argue the toss, but I'll happily bet you 50 quid here and now that the referendum WON'T be on the day the Sun claimed, for any number of reasons. Deal?

The date printed by the Sun was leaked by someone in the SNP. It may or may not turn out to be the actual date of the referendum, so I'll decline your deal thanks, but I'd happily take your 50 quid on it landing within a month either side of that date. The idea that on launch day of a paper born out of the shame of the lies and criminality of the News of the World, during the Leveson inquiry, the Sun would make up something so deniable, is laughable. And indeed the lack of a denial from the SNP that the source was theirs speaks volumes.

In any event, I'm glad to have established common ground on the need for a simple choice between a clearly defined independence and the status quo. I look forward to the clear definition of independence emerging as a firm proposal well in advance of the date. Too many flags have been flown and u-turns made in recent months for Scots to have any certainty as to what independence would really look like. And it's vital that we can judge on the facts, not on some hand-waving definition of a land of milk and honey.

So what do you think will happen if, as I predict, come 2014 Labour's UK poll strength continues to be high, and referendum polling continues to suggest that Scots favour being part of the UK? Do you agree with me that Alex Salmond, ever the shrewd operator, will far prefer to find a reason why the vote cannot go ahead, than lose and have nowhere else to go? Do you think a reason will be found to tie up the referendum in the courts and delay it beyond 2015, and if so, what do you think it might be?

No, I don't. (In what's rapidly becoming a Scottish Labour trademark, I've repeatedly offered a wager to that effect to your compatriot Ian Smart, who keeps loudly insisting that the referendum isn't going happen. He won't put his money where his mouth is either...) And as for the poll being within a month either side of the Sun's date, well, duh - of course it will. There's only about a two-month window it could POSSIBLY happen in.

Salmond said it would be "well into the second half" of the Parliament, which takes us to early summer 2014 at the minimum, and it can't go into 2015 because that would run uncomfortably close to the General Election. (Plus you don't want to be holding a referendum in the Scottish winter, when there's a good chance of people getting snowed out of polling stations.)

Allowing for all the stuff that's going to be happening in spring/summer (World Cup, Ryder Cup, Commonwealth Games, school holidays, plus the desire to avoid having it around the Bannockburn anniversary because even Brian Taylor recognises that the SNP aren't that stupid), mid-September to mid-November 2014 is pretty much the only period that fits the required criteria.  (In fact it's hard to see it being as late as November, again because of the danger of bad weather, but the first half is just about feasible. I originally guessed at St Andrew's Day, but on reflection that's just too late in the year and too close to Christmas.)

The Sun are just as capable of working all that out as I am, without needing anything to be "leaked" by anyone, and amazingly enough they plumped for a date bang in the middle of that range so they'd be as close as possible whatever happened.  But you made an allegation based on a groundless assertion about a specific date so that you could smear the SNP, rather than reaching the obvious, logical and altogether less sinister conclusion. I don't know if it's cheap and cynical opportunism or if Scottish Labour are just genuinely so paranoid that they see evil wee Salmond-faced demons everywhere they look - both would be entirely in character for the party - but either way it's predictable and boring.

Question 4

I'm intrigued by your comment back in Question 2 about "fighting for our values in union". The independence debate isn't really a fight between "nationalists" and "Unionists", but one between Scottish nationalists and British nationalists. You've described yourself as an internationalist, and as far as I know you subscribe to the much-repeated Labour line that there's no difference between a low-paid worker in Barnsley and one in Banff, yet you exclude ones in Bruges or Boston from your "union" - I've never seen Labour or any other so-called "Unionists" advocating a World Government, or a single European super-state, or a 1984-style Oceania uniting the English-speaking world.

The inescapable conclusion is therefore that "Unionists" DO still accept the concept of individual nations, it's just that they've decided Britain rather than Scotland is their own one. That being the case, can you tell us how you arrived at this seemingly-arbitrary choice? Are there specific criteria (eg nothing below, say, a 30m population counts as a legitimate nation), is it just a gut feeling, did you toss a coin, or is there something else?

My view is that the fewer islands of self-interest we create in the world the better. Since Scottish independence would create a new island of self-interest, I'm against it. Uniting helps ordinary people and shares effort; dividing pits ordinary people against each other and wastes effort. It's a simple as that as far as I'm concerned.

You're flat out wrong to claim that everyone is a nationalist. I'm not one, and indeed I'd estimate a substantial proportion of folk on both sides of the independence debate aren't nationalists either. The fact that I have a nationality does not make me a nationalist, just as the fact that I have a race does not make me a racist.

As far as world governments go, I'd like to see the workers own the means of production everywhere on earth; we could then see where that might lead. I'm comfortable with the idea of a federal Europe in time. I believe that the richest countries can and should unite with the poorest and share the world's resources. None of these things are as ludicrous as the scorn in your opening paragraph seeks to pretend.

The fundamental point is simple: co-operation is good for people, bad for profits; competition is bad for people, good for profits. I'm on the side of the people. The union is on the side of the people. The last thing we need is more islands of self-interest in the world.

I was with you all the way up to "the Union is on the side of the people". Where in the name of Wee Archie Gemmill do you get an idea as wildly at odds with reality as that when you live in Britain, one of the most unequal countries in the civilised world, and which is getting more unequal by the day because all three of its main political parties are business-friendly, profit-worshipping neoliberals?

You do know that inequality ROSE under 13 years of a UK Labour government, and is heading into the stratosphere under the Tories, yes? At some point aren't you going to have to come to terms with the fact that the idealised 1960s-style Labour Party in your head bears almost no resemblance whatever to the one that actually contests elections?

(Then again, if you honestly believe that the richest countries are going to "unite with the poorest and share the world's resources" any time between now and the end of eternity, perhaps not - are you interested in purchasing some magic beans, by any chance? I'm aware that this debate is becoming more of an argument, but I really don't know if it's possible to hold a sensible discussion with anybody who could say that with a straight face. As pressure on resources starts to really mount in the next 50 years and the world population goes through the roof, most rational people are predicting a dramatic upsurge in wars, not the sudden outbreak of a new Summer Of Love. The world is completely incapable of getting along even when there's plenty of food and water and oil for everyone - you really think those things becoming scarcer will make the people who have them MORE inclined to give them away?)

What an incredibly disappointing response. Not only have you ignored almost all the points I raised including my direct answer to your question, but you've resorted to the sort of sneering self-satisfaction which typifies so much of SNP and nationalist politics. At best, your argument can be summarised as "there's no point in trying to make the world better, let's pull up the drawbridge on our little patch and sod the rest".

I would point out that while the gap between rich and poor rose under the last Labour government, which is an important measure, the more significant fact is that over a million families with children were lifted out of poverty thanks to the redistributive policies of Labour during the ten years following 1997. That's not profit-worshipping neoliberalism, that's the biggest redistribution of wealth this country has seen in more than 60 years. And every time achievements like the minimum wage and tax credits are ignored by someone like you trying to tar all parties with the same brush, I know I'm talking to a point-scorer not a debater.

In my time debating with pro-independence folk I have come across a lot of people who can at least justify on principle why they think independence for Scotland is a good idea. I have disagreed, on principle, but I can respect their views. I was wary of entering into this discussion with you because from past interactions I suspected that you would not be one of those people. How right I was. We're done.

  1. Hi Dunc. Once again I'm sad to see you haven't been able to resist inserting outright lies into your side of the debate. I didn't "ignore" the minimum wage or tax credits, because you didn't raise them, instead embarking on a bizarre fantasy of a caring, sharing future world straight out of a fairy tale.

    Both are clearly good things in themselves, but tax credits are an appallingly-implemented one which have terrified lots of people out of claiming them for fear of being landed with a huge bill for "overpayments", and the minimum wage is a sticking plaster over a shotgun wound. I imagine my attitude to the LIVING wage is exactly the same as yours - it should be one of the very first priorities for any government - and I'm only sad that after 13 years of Labour there's a gap between the minimum wage and the living wage in the first place. The fact that Labour acknowledges the "minimum wage" isn't - by some distance - a liveable one is one of the lasting legacies of shame of the Blair/Brown years.

    Oh, and given that you accept the gap between rich and poor grew under Labour, where has all this "redistributed wealth" that's lifted children out of poverty been redistributed FROM, since it's not the rich?

  2. And of course, you again dodged my question - in what conceivable way is the Union "on the side of the people"? I accept that you think *Labour* is, even if I disagree, but *the Union* specifically is the thing that brings us regular Tory governments, because it's dominated by Tory-inclined English voters.

    Even if you're sticking to your absurd denial of the empirically-obvious fact that the UK elects more Tory governments than Scotland and will continue to do so, *the Union has a Tory government right now*, one which Scotland overwhelmingly rejected at both Westminster and Holyrood elections. The only conclusion it's factually possible to draw is therefore that you think the Tories are "on the side of the people", which is a little odd.

  3. You ignored them by implying that Labour did nothing to address inequality, which simply isn't true.

    And if you can't understand how wealth can be redistributed from the rich to the poor whilst the gap increases, then you need to brush up on your maths. The very rich got very much richer, but Labour redistributed some of that wealth to ensure that the very poor got richer too. And I'm proud of that.

  4. Oh dear, and we're back to talking about Scotland as a voting bloc. The worst possible argument for independence: if we lose the vote, gerrymander the boundary.

  5. But as a body politic, Scotland does exist - our political values and goals (constitution aside) are clearly differentiated from those of England.

    Now of course there is some ramping at the edges, rather than a sharp discontinuity 2 miles north of Berwick, so you could easily shift the border back and forward quite a bit, but that's true for all geo-socio/political groups (language works the same - German and Dutch are different languages, but listening to them at the border you'd find it hard to know which side you're on)

  6. "implying that Labour did nothing to address inequality"

    I didn't IMPLY they'd done nothing to address inequality, I came right out and said they'd actively made it WORSE, which is a fact even you accept. The details are fairly irrelevant to the point.

    "The very rich got very much richer"

    And if it wasn't from the poor, where did THAT money come from, pray tell? I'm not the one with wonky arithmetic here - if the rich get richer, by definition that extra wealth can only come from the poor. The constant upward siphoning of wealth is the core fundamental principle of capitalism.

    So what you're essentially saying is that under Labour, the rich took £100 from the adult poor, but the government redistributed £5 of it to poor children. The money wasn't redistributed from the rich to the poor, but from the childless poor to poor families, and that certainly WAS a characteristic trait of the last Labour administration.

  7. "But as a body politic, Scotland does exist - our political values and goals (constitution aside) are clearly differentiated from those of England."

    That's the thing - despite decades of staggeringly conclusive evidence, Duncan simply doesn't accept that that's true. As I said in the debate, I'm not claiming there's something in "Scottish DNA" that makes it so, I'm saying that's just the way it's panned out for all manner of social reasons.

    But acknowledging the real-world fact would interfere with Dunc's ideological principles, so he puts his blind eye to the telescope and ends up looking a bit daft by insisting that Scotland is as likely to elect Tory governments as the UK.

  8. So no wealth is ever created in your version of capitalism? Fascinating. You're wrong on this.

    And it is staggeringly obvious that observing what has happened in Scottish politics in the past is not a proof that Scotland is a voting bloc. People change how they vote due to circumstances. They always have. If you think Scots would vote the same as they do now in an independent Scotland you're deluding yourself.

  9. "So no wealth is ever created in your version of capitalism?"

    No. Wealth is like energy - it's based on a finite resource and as such can't be created, only moved around. Very surprised to see a self-styled socialist subscribing to the arch-capitalist myth that you can just invent it out of nothing.

    "what has happened in Scottish politics in the past is not a proof that Scotland is a voting bloc"

    Absolutely nobody said it was - the triumphs of the SNP in 2007 and 2011 are testament to that. But its centre is calibrated significantly to the left of that of the UK, and has been for the entire modern era. Everyone goes on about 1955, but (a) it's the ONLY time the Tories have ever won a plurality of seats in Scotland in the last century, and (b) they still did better in the UK than in Scotland (55% to 51%). There has, as far as I'm aware, NEVER been a SINGLE election in the last 100 years in which the Tories did better in Scotland than in the UK.

    It's always weird to see Labour clinging desperately to the hope of a hypothetical Scottish Tory government as their great defence of the Union.

    1. "So no wealth is ever created in your version of capitalism?"

      An interesting take on wealth / job creation here...

  10. Yikes Stuart. The disconnect with what is written and what you obviously hear once it has entered your head is quite frightening.

  11. Here's how surprised I am that yet again you've dodged the question and the facts and resorted to personal jibes: 0 surprised.

  12. You didn't ask a question. You talked nonsense and pretended I said things I didn't. Again.

  13. What was the "nonsense"? Do you actually believe that wealth can be "created", or do you believe that the Tories HAVE ever done better in Scotland than in the UK? Help me out here.

  14. A total of £53 Billlion was raised in Scotland in the 2010/11 fiscal year.

    A total of £30 Billion was returned to the Scottish government in the same year.

    Debate over; enough said!

  15. Duncan

    Like many others you have mistaken this RevStu fella as a person interested in anything other than his own form of philosophical misanthropy and narcissistic solipsism.

    Your debate followed an inevitable pattern when engaging with the chap.

    1) Exchange of argument/debate
    2) Disagreement over evidence/definitions
    3) Mud slinging ad hominems/insults regarding intelligence and grasp of reality
    4) Playground name calling

    I've taken a look over the net at some of this guy's debates/arguments and they are all tediously similar.
    Some of the insults he throws are nothing short of repugnantly fascist in their extremism. For someone who is over 40 it's nothing short of disturbing.

    Examples on his own site are headlines such as "The Scots are Cringing Pitiful Scum" and refering to Northern Irish people voting for Sinn Fein as "spectacularly retarded."

    Well done for trying to engage him like he had a grounding in humanity. But I have become increasingly convinced that that just isn't possible with this type of hypocritical misanthrope.

  16. Jee Ahdinnaeken,

    No-one could ever accuse you of making ad-hominem attacks or completely ignorig the substantive debate :-p

    Duncan, interesting debate but I got a bit dumbstruck at the part where you thought it was ok that the gap between rich and poor got wider under Labour because even those at the bottom ended up richer than before. Richer than before in absolute terms perhaps but that's not something I would expect a Labour man to be proud of especially not one who argues only Labour can be trusted to address INEQUALITY.

    As for your refusal to accept there may be a separate political will in Scotland, why would you be a devolutionist in that case? Or can there only be a separate will on devolved issues but not in terms of macro-economic and foreign policy etc?

  17. "As for your refusal to accept there may be a separate political will in Scotland, why would you be a devolutionist in that case? Or can there only be a separate will on devolved issues but not in terms of macro-economic and foreign policy etc?"

    Now THERE'S an interesting point, especially as Dunc thinks "The last thing we need is more islands of self-interest in the world". Shouldn't we indeed therefore logically reverse devolution and handle everything from Westminster?

    (As a predecessor to Westminster becoming itself a devolved administration in a federal Europe, and presumably so on and so forth until we're all one happy global nation with a single government, sharing all our means of production and resources and hugging.)

  18. I'm a devolutionist.

    What on earth is that?

    1. I believe its a member of the FUD party.

  19. It's hard to say. For example, Johann Lamont says in today's Scotland On Sunday:

    "My Scottish Labour Party is arguably the only party in Scotland which truly believes in the devolution of power, while the SNP continues an increasingly centralist agenda."

    So Johann wants to devolve more power away from the centre, while Duncan wants to increasingly centralise towards a federal Europe and NOT "create any more islands of self-interest". It's a puzzler. I often find myself wondering if Dunc is a member of a completely different Labour Party to the one we read about in the papers.

  20. Just wanted to say fair enough debate; didn't read it all but apart from a few barbed jabs from either side it got me thinking about how both sides think. I am curious about one thing though. I totally agree with what Duncan Hothersall says in the following quote.

    " Scotland does not have a single political affiliation, or even a predominant one. We are a plural society with a wide range of views represented, just as the whole of the UK is. We have a history of more social conservatism than the rest of the UK. And it is utterly foolhardy for anyone to predict that an independent Scotland would be left aligned. People will vote for the leaders and policies they think are best and this assessment will change over time. "

    Therefore, I cannot fathom why he goes on to write the following.

    " I look forward to the clear definition of independence emerging as a firm proposal well in advance of the date. "

    Assuming that he actually agrees with himself in the former is it not actually inconsistent to ask for a firm proposal of what independence will be like in the future? Whatever the actual proposal offered by the SNP Government at the time of the referendum vote I hold the right, as does any citizen in this clearly plural society, to hold whichever parties are in Government to account as long as one lives. The actual proposal by the SNP Government is just one view. The type of Scotland that will surface will change all the time. The relationship with the Rest of the UK will ultimately feature strongly in post independence elections and the people will vote for the party they feel represents their views. It's the principle of independence that is paramount. The actual details will be moulded in time; just as the Union has.

    I actually disagree with the SNP asserting what an independent Scotland would look like. It's plain wrong. It's for all of us to assert our own individual opinions on what it will be.

    My other question is this: What is it that the Scottish Labour Party want with regards to what level of Devolution for Scotland?

    Johann Lamont wrote an article the other day. She's been Leader some seven months, the prospect of how Scotland is governed constitutionally has been saturating the news yet I still don't really know what levers she would like/not like for Scotland. All I hear is "there is a need to have an honest debate", "the acid test should be what is good for Scotland", "we need to use the powers we have now" etc. The things is, nobody on this earth could disagree with any of that. We're having the debate now. Johann Lamont is a leader of a political party and wants people to vote for her to lead Scotland. She must have a broadbrush view of what powers she does or doesn't want. Everyone in Scotland does. She says we should have debate; we need to have her opinion to inform it!

  21. actually reading the comments it seems it did just descend into shouting. However, sometimes in order to gauge truly what people think they need to let their blood boil a bit. Am still interested by the debate, cheers for publishing. I also think that both of you agree on more than you disagree on. If Scotland could only just work together we'd be in a better place.

  22. I also think that RevStu, although perhaps in an inflammatory manner has hit home a good point. If there is no body of Scottish politik (am not saying whether I personally agree or not with that assertion, by the way) what was the point of Devolution in the first place? Surely the Devolution was to allow the people of Scotland to decide things differently from Westminster? But why bother? Why was Scotland so 'special'? The Scottish Labour party has already conceded the principle of devolution to an area called Scotland. Surely, independence is just the extreme variation of this exact same principle?

  23. "I actually disagree with the SNP asserting what an independent Scotland would look like. It's plain wrong. It's for all of us to assert our own individual opinions on what it will be."

    Indeed. I've made exactly that point numerous times:

    Independence determines one thing and one thing only: who has the right to elect Scotland's government - Scots, or Tory voters in England?

    "I also think that both of you agree on more than you disagree on"

    No doubt. I certainly consider myself a socialist and I'm sure Dunc does too. It's just a shame the party he's determined to cling blindly to long since abandoned the idea, and that he hates the SNP so much he can't see that - while far from outright socialist - it's now by a significant distance, and by countless impartial assessments, the most left-wing party in the entire UK political mainstream.


text:
The Contingent portrays a military unit of the 11th century in the most authentic way possible. The focus lies on Norman, Salian and Franco-Flemish culture of the time. But not only military reenactment is important to us: We also show a wide variety of authentic crafts, trade and baggage/camp life. This makes the Contingent unique not only in size, but in quality as well.

The Structure

A set structure is essential for the functioning of any military unit and therefore for the Contingent. To ensure smooth procedures the FFC is commanded by a set of staff members, the Cadre. The staff takes on logistic business during and in between each event. Even though, individual freedom should not be restricted more than needed, these rules must always be followed by all members:

1. accepting the hierarchy of the FFC as a military unit
2. the kit-guides must be followed
3. the Marsfeld (training weekend in the beginning of the year) is obligatory to attend annually
4. certain specifications within one’s own social standing are also obligatory
5. a fee of 12€ is due each year

Our Commanders

The historical Eustache (II) de Boulogne was a descendant of Carl the Great and he was count of Boulogne, Bouillon, Lens and Gent.

During the battle of Hastings, he commanded the non-norman part of William’s army, which consisted mostly of Flemish and Franks. Him, Hugh of Ponthieu and Giffard could reach Harold during the battle and eventually the Eustache killed him by chopping his head off. (1) Gerald Uhl de Canehan, also known as “Uhl”, who has been quartermaster of the Contingent for years, was elected as commander of the FFC. In 2016, he earned the honorary title of Comte de Boulogne, which was awarded to him by the House of Orléans through Henri Pierre Marie d’Orléans and Robert Comte d’Eu. Additionally, he is Chairman of Der Uhl zu Wilhaim, historischer n.e.V, which is a recognized, nonprofit club. He is also a trainer at HEMA and a member of EXAR.

(1) Guy de Amiens,  Carmen de Hastingae Proelio

Comes Sizzo is a fictional character, based on the counts of Schwarzburg (Thuringia). Three of the same name are documented in history. The last of his name was Sizzo III, who later became founder of the House Kevernburg-Schwarzburg. A statue of him is located in the Naumburg Cathedral.

Maik Elliger oversees all military issues of the FFC and commands the troops. He has been an active reenactor since 1997, is the chairman of the Thüringer Ritterbund and a member of the German Ritterkonvent. In 2004, he was elected a Lieutenant within the Contingent. As a retired soldier and a martial artist he is especially qualified for his position.

The Contingent offers it’s members at least one event per year (although usually a lot more), a penal for discussion and information, as well as help, contacts, training and guides to make the reenactment experience enjoyable.

The FFC is supporter and signatory of the Aachener Erklärung. Hence, we avow to religious neutrality. We are more than happy to welcome all new recruits!

Vive la Normandie!


text:
Hiking "to the top" on December 8th, 1998:

Krystin's picnic rock, near the summit. Josh helped with a lot of the clearing we did along the way, mostly with the stick he's holding while he rests near picnic rock.

These are pictures taken at near peak:

Our first snow, permission to burn excess brush with a snowy Bonfire, December 8th, 1998

While setting up our Christmas tree on a rainy afternoon, we got a call from Chappy, reporting that there was enough snow cover on the ground to manage a bonfire and easilly rid ourselves of the remaining brushpile. From 5:30 until almost midnight, we fed the fire until both Dan and Mary were completely exhausted. When we were done only a very small pile of brush remained, and a stump we'd forgotten even existed, there at the bottom of the brush pile.


text:
Licencias Creative Commons

Type Slideshow
Description Esta presentación trata sobre las licencias de uso de materiales en Internet, en concreto sobre las licencias Creative Commons.
Author Javier
License Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike
Attribute to Javier (
Language Language independent
Created at December 03, 2016 14:58
Updated at December 04, 2016 05:34

A SCORM package is a collection of files which are packaged according to an agreed standard for educational resources. SCORM packages are zip files that can be integrated in any LMS (Learning Management System) that supports the standard (Moodle, Blackboard, …) and that can be used for presenting multimedia content and as assessment tools. Thus, you can integrate your Slideshow in Moodle and other LMSs by downloading it as SCORM.

No comments for this resource

Have you used this educational resource?

Evaluate it

Are you a teacher and have you used this educational resource in your lectures?

Evaluate your teaching experience


text:
modular homes as additions

The exciting photograph below, is segment of Modular Home Addition Kits publishing which is assigned within Modular Home Designs, and posted at July 1st, 2015 08:09:32 AM by admin.

Modular Home Addition Kits : Modular Homes As Additions

Complete the addition of the second floor, family room, extra bedroom, in-law suite, au pairs, expanded kitchen, home office, home theaters can all be quickly built and delivered, to meet your lifestyle change. All without leaving the environment that you love, or coping with stress sell and move. The addition is a great way to have your dream home, without leaving years of memories tied to your current home. And, of course, with Epoch, each additional is a completely custom design, based on your needs.

Here is crucial recommendation on . We have the excellent step for . Check it out for yourself! You can gather Modular Homes As Additions guide and read the latest Modular Home Addition Kits in here.

Back to Modular Home Addition Kits

Photo Gallery of the Modular Home Addition Kits


text:
Time of issue:2019-10-31 00:00:00

  中文版  |  ENGLISH

Fake gas company employee fraud arrested

Fake gas company employee fraud arrested

2019-10-31 16:35

　　Beijing reporter repeatedly disguised as "gas company employees" home "free" check, specifically to swindle the elderly alone at home, the four suspects were currently criminal detention by Haidian police.

　　According to Zhang Lao, who lives in Haidian District, he said on April 21st he was cheated of 6,000 yuan in cash by two men who claimed to be "gas company employees." They said that gas safety inspection, inspection, said Mr. Zhang Lao gas supply hose aging, free replacement for him a hose; also known as gas stove has a leak, the proposed maintenance. "We have supporting manufacturers can come to service," the man in front of Mr. Zhang Lao's face and manufacturers.

　　A moment later, two "factory" personnel came to check, "identified" the stove does have a problem to be repaired, the temporary replacement of gas stove can be provided during the return of the factory, but Mr. Chang Lao first pay 6000 yuan deposit. Fear of leaking gas is not safe, Mr Zhang did not think too much agreed, to the other 6,000 yuan in cash. After the "factory staff" replaced the cooking stove, they left with two gas company employees. Mr. Zhang Changlao's daughter returned home, but found that alternative gas stoves work extremely rough, is simply defective products. Mr. Zhang Lao was fooled, call the police.

　　Police investigators from Haidian Criminal Investigation Cell surveillance video and found that this is a four-person gang, they take the minivan to the area, remove the gas stove from the car, after the car cheated to leave the district.

　　Half a month later, the police found that the minivan parked in the Palazzo Vecchio in Daxing District, Dunshou nearly a week and found the car back and forth early every day, wandering around in the city, and finally stopped in front of some old quarters. Two men put on uniforms, pretend Gas Company employees, knocking door to door. The other two from the car and then remove the gas stove or range hood, into the home fraud.

　　On May 16, four people were arrested when they wanted to go out to defraud. The car was taken prisoner uniforms, multiple deposit receipts and 12 bad gas stoves and hoods. The receipt shows that this group of people have committed 5 crimes within 3 days and scamped more than 2 million yuan.

　　Four claiming to be fellow, accidentally learned that this method of fraud, they tried to buy 100 yuan each from Hebei to buy some residual gas stoves and range hoods and bought fake uniforms, specializing in home-alone elderly committing the crime, Just over a month more than a dozen successful fraud.

　　The two first entered the house with fake identities of employees of the gas company and changed their hoses to cheat the owner for free. After they trust their gas stoves or range hoods, two other accomplices who pretend to be factory workers to "repair problems." After returning to the factory overhaul to provide temporary replacement grounds, cheat away "deposit."

　　Police Tip: The elderly alone at home to raise awareness of safety precautions. Home gas equipment damage, call the regular manufacturer warranty call. Encounter company employees on-site service, you should carefully verify their identity, and call the company to confirm the phone.

Address：No. 99 Zhi Yi Road, city street, Rugao, Jiangsu Tel：86-513-87620001 E-mail：cw@cw88.com

COPYRIGHT © 2019 Jiangsu Huiming Natural Gas Group Co., Ltd.    苏ICP备17021467号   |   Powered by：www.300.cn

www.hmtrq.com   ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

QR code

Mobile QR code

QR code

Wechat public number